人工智能辅助的面部软组织建模网格生成。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Nathan Lampen, Xuanang Xu, Daeseung Kim, Tianshu Kuang, Jungwook Lee, Hannah H Deng, Jaime Gateno, Pingkun Yan
{"title":"人工智能辅助的面部软组织建模网格生成。","authors":"Nathan Lampen, Xuanang Xu, Daeseung Kim, Tianshu Kuang, Jungwook Lee, Hannah H Deng, Jaime Gateno, Pingkun Yan","doi":"10.1007/s11548-025-03419-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Simulation of reconstructive and cosmetic facial surgeries, such as orthognathic surgery, requires precise, patient-specific soft tissue meshes for outcome prediction. Conventional meshing methods rely on labor-intensive processes, including manual landmark digitization and mesh editing, and often lack point correspondence among subjects. These limitations reduce their efficiency, scalability, and utility in fast-paced clinical environments, highlighting the need for innovative and streamlined meshing techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study presents a novel AI-assisted mesh generation (AAMG) approach using Google MediaPipe for real-time facial landmark detection to automate the creation of volumetric meshes of facial soft tissues. By leveraging these landmarks as reference points, the AAMG method generates detailed meshes that accurately reflect individual facial anatomy without manual intervention. To evaluate performance, we compared our automated method with a clinically validated, expert-guided mesh generation (EGMG) method that relies on manual landmark digitization and mesh editing. Both methods were tested on a dataset of 29 subjects who had undergone orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AAMG method demonstrated high-quality metrics, with a mean Jacobian ratio of 0.83, skewness of 0.25, and an aspect ratio of 2.15, comparable to the EGMG method. Additionally, Chamfer distance analysis showed no significant differences affecting simulation performance between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed AI-assisted mesh generation method significantly reduces mesh generation time from several hours to under a minute, while maintaining comparable mesh quality and accuracy to a clinically validated, expert-guided mesh generation method. Our method ensures consistent subject-specific meshing by leveraging real-time landmark detection and automated interpolation, improving workflow efficiency for surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-assisted mesh generation for subject-specific modeling of facial soft tissues.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Lampen, Xuanang Xu, Daeseung Kim, Tianshu Kuang, Jungwook Lee, Hannah H Deng, Jaime Gateno, Pingkun Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11548-025-03419-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Simulation of reconstructive and cosmetic facial surgeries, such as orthognathic surgery, requires precise, patient-specific soft tissue meshes for outcome prediction. Conventional meshing methods rely on labor-intensive processes, including manual landmark digitization and mesh editing, and often lack point correspondence among subjects. These limitations reduce their efficiency, scalability, and utility in fast-paced clinical environments, highlighting the need for innovative and streamlined meshing techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study presents a novel AI-assisted mesh generation (AAMG) approach using Google MediaPipe for real-time facial landmark detection to automate the creation of volumetric meshes of facial soft tissues. By leveraging these landmarks as reference points, the AAMG method generates detailed meshes that accurately reflect individual facial anatomy without manual intervention. To evaluate performance, we compared our automated method with a clinically validated, expert-guided mesh generation (EGMG) method that relies on manual landmark digitization and mesh editing. Both methods were tested on a dataset of 29 subjects who had undergone orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AAMG method demonstrated high-quality metrics, with a mean Jacobian ratio of 0.83, skewness of 0.25, and an aspect ratio of 2.15, comparable to the EGMG method. Additionally, Chamfer distance analysis showed no significant differences affecting simulation performance between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed AI-assisted mesh generation method significantly reduces mesh generation time from several hours to under a minute, while maintaining comparable mesh quality and accuracy to a clinically validated, expert-guided mesh generation method. Our method ensures consistent subject-specific meshing by leveraging real-time landmark detection and automated interpolation, improving workflow efficiency for surgical planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03419-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03419-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:模拟面部重建和美容手术,如正颌手术,需要精确的,患者特异性的软组织网格来预测结果。传统的网格划分方法依赖于人工地标数字化和网格编辑等劳动密集型过程,并且往往缺乏对象之间的点对应。这些限制降低了它们在快节奏临床环境中的效率、可扩展性和实用性,突出了对创新和流线型网格技术的需求。方法:本研究提出了一种新的人工智能辅助网格生成(AAMG)方法,使用谷歌MediaPipe进行实时面部地标检测,以自动创建面部软组织的体积网格。通过利用这些地标作为参考点,AAMG方法生成详细的网格,准确反映个人面部解剖,无需人工干预。为了评估性能,我们将自动化方法与临床验证的专家指导网格生成(EGMG)方法进行了比较,EGMG方法依赖于手动地标数字化和网格编辑。这两种方法都在29名接受过正颌手术的受试者的数据集上进行了测试。结果:AAMG方法显示出高质量的指标,平均雅可比比为0.83,偏度为0.25,纵横比为2.15,与EGMG方法相当。此外,倒角距离分析显示两种方法对仿真性能的影响没有显著差异。结论:提出的人工智能辅助网格生成方法显着将网格生成时间从几个小时减少到不到一分钟,同时保持与临床验证的专家指导的网格生成方法相当的网格质量和准确性。我们的方法通过利用实时地标检测和自动插值来确保一致的主题特定网格,提高手术计划的工作流程效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-assisted mesh generation for subject-specific modeling of facial soft tissues.

Purpose: Simulation of reconstructive and cosmetic facial surgeries, such as orthognathic surgery, requires precise, patient-specific soft tissue meshes for outcome prediction. Conventional meshing methods rely on labor-intensive processes, including manual landmark digitization and mesh editing, and often lack point correspondence among subjects. These limitations reduce their efficiency, scalability, and utility in fast-paced clinical environments, highlighting the need for innovative and streamlined meshing techniques.

Methods: This study presents a novel AI-assisted mesh generation (AAMG) approach using Google MediaPipe for real-time facial landmark detection to automate the creation of volumetric meshes of facial soft tissues. By leveraging these landmarks as reference points, the AAMG method generates detailed meshes that accurately reflect individual facial anatomy without manual intervention. To evaluate performance, we compared our automated method with a clinically validated, expert-guided mesh generation (EGMG) method that relies on manual landmark digitization and mesh editing. Both methods were tested on a dataset of 29 subjects who had undergone orthognathic surgery.

Results: The AAMG method demonstrated high-quality metrics, with a mean Jacobian ratio of 0.83, skewness of 0.25, and an aspect ratio of 2.15, comparable to the EGMG method. Additionally, Chamfer distance analysis showed no significant differences affecting simulation performance between the two methods.

Conclusion: The proposed AI-assisted mesh generation method significantly reduces mesh generation time from several hours to under a minute, while maintaining comparable mesh quality and accuracy to a clinically validated, expert-guided mesh generation method. Our method ensures consistent subject-specific meshing by leveraging real-time landmark detection and automated interpolation, improving workflow efficiency for surgical planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信