Thomas Failing, Rolf Behrens, Frank W Hensley, Boris Keil, Thorsten Schneider, Klemens Zink
{"title":"高能近距离治疗中探测器响应的角依赖性。","authors":"Thomas Failing, Rolf Behrens, Frank W Hensley, Boris Keil, Thorsten Schneider, Klemens Zink","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adda8c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b>To characterize three small volume ionization chambers and a diamond detector concerning their angular dependent response under Ir-192 irradiation.
<b>Approach:</b>Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and experimental measurements of the angular dependent response were performed at 10cm distance in air. Further simulations were performed at distances of 1-10cm in water. The detectors were placed in relation to their reference points specified by the manufacturer and rotated relative to the beam axis. Results for the different setups were compared to investigate the influence of water and air as well as a distance dependence of angular response. Detector specific properties such as ionization chambers dead volumes or asymmetries were taken into account.
<b>Main results:</b>The MC simulations in air could be experimentally verified. The detectors showed an angular dependence <0.5% for rotations ≤20°, ≤35°, ≤40° and ≤50° at distances of 1-10cm in water, respectively. In air at 10cm distance, the angular dependence exceeded 0.5% for rotations of 20° for the microDiamond and for 50° for the Semiflex and PinPoint. Here, the angular dependence of the A26 was <0.5% at all angles.
The slope of the angular dependence increased with rotation from frontal alignment for all detectors. Variations of detector angular dependent response caused by volume averaging were largest close to the source, i.e. up to 8% at 1cm distance. High-Z materials in the vicinity of the sensitive volumes were an additional source of angular response variations amounting up to 4% independent of the distance
<b>Significance:</b>To the best of the authors' knowledge, this work is the first investigation of perturbation factors, also differential in energy, leading to angular dependent detector response in high-energy brachytherapy dosimetry. The results could be useful to estimate the angular dependent response when measuring complex dose rate distributions, e.g. multiple source positions or in a heterogeneous environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angular dependence of detector responses in high-energy brachytherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Failing, Rolf Behrens, Frank W Hensley, Boris Keil, Thorsten Schneider, Klemens Zink\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/adda8c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b>To characterize three small volume ionization chambers and a diamond detector concerning their angular dependent response under Ir-192 irradiation.
<b>Approach:</b>Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and experimental measurements of the angular dependent response were performed at 10cm distance in air. Further simulations were performed at distances of 1-10cm in water. The detectors were placed in relation to their reference points specified by the manufacturer and rotated relative to the beam axis. Results for the different setups were compared to investigate the influence of water and air as well as a distance dependence of angular response. Detector specific properties such as ionization chambers dead volumes or asymmetries were taken into account.
<b>Main results:</b>The MC simulations in air could be experimentally verified. The detectors showed an angular dependence <0.5% for rotations ≤20°, ≤35°, ≤40° and ≤50° at distances of 1-10cm in water, respectively. In air at 10cm distance, the angular dependence exceeded 0.5% for rotations of 20° for the microDiamond and for 50° for the Semiflex and PinPoint. Here, the angular dependence of the A26 was <0.5% at all angles.
The slope of the angular dependence increased with rotation from frontal alignment for all detectors. Variations of detector angular dependent response caused by volume averaging were largest close to the source, i.e. up to 8% at 1cm distance. High-Z materials in the vicinity of the sensitive volumes were an additional source of angular response variations amounting up to 4% independent of the distance
<b>Significance:</b>To the best of the authors' knowledge, this work is the first investigation of perturbation factors, also differential in energy, leading to angular dependent detector response in high-energy brachytherapy dosimetry. The results could be useful to estimate the angular dependent response when measuring complex dose rate distributions, e.g. multiple source positions or in a heterogeneous environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adda8c\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adda8c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Angular dependence of detector responses in high-energy brachytherapy.
Objective:To characterize three small volume ionization chambers and a diamond detector concerning their angular dependent response under Ir-192 irradiation.
Approach:Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and experimental measurements of the angular dependent response were performed at 10cm distance in air. Further simulations were performed at distances of 1-10cm in water. The detectors were placed in relation to their reference points specified by the manufacturer and rotated relative to the beam axis. Results for the different setups were compared to investigate the influence of water and air as well as a distance dependence of angular response. Detector specific properties such as ionization chambers dead volumes or asymmetries were taken into account.
Main results:The MC simulations in air could be experimentally verified. The detectors showed an angular dependence <0.5% for rotations ≤20°, ≤35°, ≤40° and ≤50° at distances of 1-10cm in water, respectively. In air at 10cm distance, the angular dependence exceeded 0.5% for rotations of 20° for the microDiamond and for 50° for the Semiflex and PinPoint. Here, the angular dependence of the A26 was <0.5% at all angles.
The slope of the angular dependence increased with rotation from frontal alignment for all detectors. Variations of detector angular dependent response caused by volume averaging were largest close to the source, i.e. up to 8% at 1cm distance. High-Z materials in the vicinity of the sensitive volumes were an additional source of angular response variations amounting up to 4% independent of the distance
Significance:To the best of the authors' knowledge, this work is the first investigation of perturbation factors, also differential in energy, leading to angular dependent detector response in high-energy brachytherapy dosimetry. The results could be useful to estimate the angular dependent response when measuring complex dose rate distributions, e.g. multiple source positions or in a heterogeneous environment.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry