评价CYP2C19抑制剂分类的证据:一项范围综述。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jean G Malavé, Andrés Lopez, Thi Doan, Emily J Cicali, Zeruesenay Desta, Caitrin W McDonough, Larisa H Cavallari
{"title":"评价CYP2C19抑制剂分类的证据:一项范围综述。","authors":"Jean G Malavé, Andrés Lopez, Thi Doan, Emily J Cicali, Zeruesenay Desta, Caitrin W McDonough, Larisa H Cavallari","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Table of Inhibitors and the Flockhart Table™ are important references for identifying CYP2C19 inhibitors. Accurate inhibitor classification is essential for evaluating phenoconversion and managing drug-drug interactions. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between inhibitor classifications according to the FDA and Flockhart tables and pharmacokinetic data from the primary literature. A scoping review of PubMed, product labels, and the Drug Interactions Database (DIDB®) up to April 2024 was conducted. Inhibitor-substrate pairs (e.g., fluoxetine-omeprazole) were assigned literature-reported classifications (i.e., weak, moderate, or strong) based on pharmacokinetic data. Concordance between literature-reported and listed classifications was evaluated. Of 90 inhibitor-substrate pairs identified, 66% involved sensitive substrates, which were the focus of our primary analysis. Among sensitive inhibitor-substrate pairs, 36% of FDA-listed and 45% of Flockhart-listed classifications were concordant with the literature. CYP2C19 phenotype appeared to impact concordance, with greater concordance among normal metabolizers for both FDA-listed (42%) and Flockhart-listed (50%) classifications. Steady state status and dosing also appeared to affect concordance. Discrepancies between listed and literature-reported classifications led to the following recommendations: (1) upgrade fluoxetine from moderate to strong in the Flockhart Table™, (2) upgrade fluconazole from moderate to strong in the Flockhart Table™, (3) downgrade omeprazole (and esomeprazole) from moderate to weak in the Flockhart Table™, and (4) include footnotes describing dose-dependent inhibition for fluvoxamine and fluconazole in both tables. These recommendations aim to improve the accuracy of CYP2C19 inhibitor classifications and the clinical utility of these tables.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Evidence for CYP2C19 Inhibitor Classifications: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jean G Malavé, Andrés Lopez, Thi Doan, Emily J Cicali, Zeruesenay Desta, Caitrin W McDonough, Larisa H Cavallari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.3712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Table of Inhibitors and the Flockhart Table™ are important references for identifying CYP2C19 inhibitors. Accurate inhibitor classification is essential for evaluating phenoconversion and managing drug-drug interactions. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between inhibitor classifications according to the FDA and Flockhart tables and pharmacokinetic data from the primary literature. A scoping review of PubMed, product labels, and the Drug Interactions Database (DIDB®) up to April 2024 was conducted. Inhibitor-substrate pairs (e.g., fluoxetine-omeprazole) were assigned literature-reported classifications (i.e., weak, moderate, or strong) based on pharmacokinetic data. Concordance between literature-reported and listed classifications was evaluated. Of 90 inhibitor-substrate pairs identified, 66% involved sensitive substrates, which were the focus of our primary analysis. Among sensitive inhibitor-substrate pairs, 36% of FDA-listed and 45% of Flockhart-listed classifications were concordant with the literature. CYP2C19 phenotype appeared to impact concordance, with greater concordance among normal metabolizers for both FDA-listed (42%) and Flockhart-listed (50%) classifications. Steady state status and dosing also appeared to affect concordance. Discrepancies between listed and literature-reported classifications led to the following recommendations: (1) upgrade fluoxetine from moderate to strong in the Flockhart Table™, (2) upgrade fluconazole from moderate to strong in the Flockhart Table™, (3) downgrade omeprazole (and esomeprazole) from moderate to weak in the Flockhart Table™, and (4) include footnotes describing dose-dependent inhibition for fluvoxamine and fluconazole in both tables. These recommendations aim to improve the accuracy of CYP2C19 inhibitor classifications and the clinical utility of these tables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3712\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)抑制剂表和Flockhart表™是鉴别CYP2C19抑制剂的重要参考。准确的抑制剂分类对于评估表型转化和管理药物-药物相互作用至关重要。本研究的目的是评估根据FDA和Flockhart表进行的抑制剂分类与原始文献中的药代动力学数据之间的一致性。对截至2024年4月的PubMed、产品标签和药物相互作用数据库(DIDB®)进行了范围审查。抑制剂-底物对(如氟西汀-奥美拉唑)根据药代动力学数据被分配到文献报道的分类(即弱、中等或强)。评估文献报道和列出分类之间的一致性。在鉴定的90对抑制剂-底物中,66%涉及敏感底物,这是我们主要分析的重点。在敏感抑制剂-底物对中,fda列出的36%和flockhart列出的45%的分类与文献一致。CYP2C19表型似乎影响一致性,在fda列出的(42%)和flockhart列出的(50%)分类中,正常代谢者的一致性更高。稳定状态和剂量似乎也影响一致性。列出的分类与文献报道的分类之间的差异导致以下建议:(1)将氟西汀在Flockhart表™中从中度升级为强,(2)将氟康唑在Flockhart表™中从中度升级为强,(3)将奥美拉唑(和埃索美拉唑)在Flockhart表™中从中度降级为弱,(4)在两个表中包括描述氟伏沙明和氟康唑的剂量依赖性抑制的脚注。这些建议旨在提高CYP2C19抑制剂分类的准确性和这些表的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Evidence for CYP2C19 Inhibitor Classifications: A Scoping Review.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Table of Inhibitors and the Flockhart Table™ are important references for identifying CYP2C19 inhibitors. Accurate inhibitor classification is essential for evaluating phenoconversion and managing drug-drug interactions. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between inhibitor classifications according to the FDA and Flockhart tables and pharmacokinetic data from the primary literature. A scoping review of PubMed, product labels, and the Drug Interactions Database (DIDB®) up to April 2024 was conducted. Inhibitor-substrate pairs (e.g., fluoxetine-omeprazole) were assigned literature-reported classifications (i.e., weak, moderate, or strong) based on pharmacokinetic data. Concordance between literature-reported and listed classifications was evaluated. Of 90 inhibitor-substrate pairs identified, 66% involved sensitive substrates, which were the focus of our primary analysis. Among sensitive inhibitor-substrate pairs, 36% of FDA-listed and 45% of Flockhart-listed classifications were concordant with the literature. CYP2C19 phenotype appeared to impact concordance, with greater concordance among normal metabolizers for both FDA-listed (42%) and Flockhart-listed (50%) classifications. Steady state status and dosing also appeared to affect concordance. Discrepancies between listed and literature-reported classifications led to the following recommendations: (1) upgrade fluoxetine from moderate to strong in the Flockhart Table™, (2) upgrade fluconazole from moderate to strong in the Flockhart Table™, (3) downgrade omeprazole (and esomeprazole) from moderate to weak in the Flockhart Table™, and (4) include footnotes describing dose-dependent inhibition for fluvoxamine and fluconazole in both tables. These recommendations aim to improve the accuracy of CYP2C19 inhibitor classifications and the clinical utility of these tables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信