按医师性别评估剖宫产风险。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yuki Joyama, Misa Hayasaka, Lindsay Robbins, George Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita
{"title":"按医师性别评估剖宫产风险。","authors":"Yuki Joyama, Misa Hayasaka, Lindsay Robbins, George Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita","doi":"10.1055/a-2615-5055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine the association between physician sex, cesarean delivery, and neonatal complications.We analyzed the Consortium on Safe Labor database including 228,437 deliveries from 2002 to 2008. The study focused on singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentations, excluding cases with contraindications to vaginal delivery, elective cesarean deliveries, and nonobstetricians and gynecologists or maternal-fetal medicine physician management. The primary outcome of this study was cesarean delivery; secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery due to arrest of dilation or descent, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracings (NRFHT), cesarean delivery for other indications, and a composite of neonatal complications. To estimate average marginal effects (AMEs) in percentage points (pp) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of cesarean delivery between male and female physicians, we performed generalized estimating equations with Poisson distribution and exchange-correlation structure, adjusting for maternal, physician-level characteristics, and hospital-fixed effects.Of 108,004 individuals, 46,779 (43.3%) were attended by 183 female physicians, and 61,225 (56.7%) were attended by 250 male physicians. Female physicians were associated with a lower overall adjusted cesarean delivery proportion (11.93 vs. 13.47%; AME -1.54 pp [95% CI: -2.35, -0.73]), cesarean delivery for failure to progress (5.72 vs. 6.48%; AME -0.76 pp [95% CI: -1.24, -0.27]), and cesarean delivery for indications except for failure to progress or NRFHT (1.68 vs. 2.01%; AME -0.33 pp [95% CI: -0.56, -0.10]). There were no significant differences in cesarean outcomes for NRFHT or composite neonatal complications between male and female physicians.Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and develop targeted interventions. · Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery.. · This reduction was particularly evident for cesarean deliveries due to failure to progress.. · The reduction was not associated with an increased risk of neonatal complications..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery Risk by Physician Sex.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Joyama, Misa Hayasaka, Lindsay Robbins, George Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2615-5055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to examine the association between physician sex, cesarean delivery, and neonatal complications.We analyzed the Consortium on Safe Labor database including 228,437 deliveries from 2002 to 2008. The study focused on singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentations, excluding cases with contraindications to vaginal delivery, elective cesarean deliveries, and nonobstetricians and gynecologists or maternal-fetal medicine physician management. The primary outcome of this study was cesarean delivery; secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery due to arrest of dilation or descent, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracings (NRFHT), cesarean delivery for other indications, and a composite of neonatal complications. To estimate average marginal effects (AMEs) in percentage points (pp) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of cesarean delivery between male and female physicians, we performed generalized estimating equations with Poisson distribution and exchange-correlation structure, adjusting for maternal, physician-level characteristics, and hospital-fixed effects.Of 108,004 individuals, 46,779 (43.3%) were attended by 183 female physicians, and 61,225 (56.7%) were attended by 250 male physicians. Female physicians were associated with a lower overall adjusted cesarean delivery proportion (11.93 vs. 13.47%; AME -1.54 pp [95% CI: -2.35, -0.73]), cesarean delivery for failure to progress (5.72 vs. 6.48%; AME -0.76 pp [95% CI: -1.24, -0.27]), and cesarean delivery for indications except for failure to progress or NRFHT (1.68 vs. 2.01%; AME -0.33 pp [95% CI: -0.56, -0.10]). There were no significant differences in cesarean outcomes for NRFHT or composite neonatal complications between male and female physicians.Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and develop targeted interventions. · Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery.. · This reduction was particularly evident for cesarean deliveries due to failure to progress.. · The reduction was not associated with an increased risk of neonatal complications..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2615-5055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2615-5055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨医师性别、剖宫产和新生儿并发症之间的关系。研究设计:我们分析了安全分娩联盟(CSL)数据库,包括2002年至2008年228,437例分娩。该研究的重点是头位出现的单胎妊娠,排除了阴道分娩、选择性剖宫产和非obgyn(产科医生和妇科医生)或MFM(母胎医学)医生管理的禁忌症。本研究的主要结局是剖宫产;次要结局是因扩张停止或下降导致的剖宫产,因不可靠的胎心追踪(NRFHT)导致的剖宫产,因其他适应症导致的剖宫产,以及新生儿并发症的综合。为了以95%可信区间(95% CI)估计男性和女性医生之间剖宫产的调整边际效应(AMEs),我们使用了泊松分布和交换相关结构的广义估计方程,调整了产妇、医生水平特征和医院固定效应。结果:108,004例患者中,46,779例(43.3%)由183名女医生诊治,61,225例(56.7%)由250名男医生诊治。女性医生与较低的总体调整剖宫产比例相关(11.93% vs. 13.47%;AME -1.54 pp [95% CI -2.35, -0.73]),进展失败剖宫产(5.72% vs. 6.48%;AME -0.76 pp [95% CI -1.24, -0.27])和剖宫产的适应症,但进展失败或不可靠的胎心追踪(NRFHT)除外(1.68% vs. 2.01%;AME -0.33 pp [95% CI -0.56, -0.10])。男性和女性医生在NRFHT或复合新生儿并发症的剖宫产结局上没有显著差异。结论:与男医师相比,女医师剖宫产率较低。需要进一步研究以了解潜在机制并制定有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery Risk by Physician Sex.

This study aimed to examine the association between physician sex, cesarean delivery, and neonatal complications.We analyzed the Consortium on Safe Labor database including 228,437 deliveries from 2002 to 2008. The study focused on singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentations, excluding cases with contraindications to vaginal delivery, elective cesarean deliveries, and nonobstetricians and gynecologists or maternal-fetal medicine physician management. The primary outcome of this study was cesarean delivery; secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery due to arrest of dilation or descent, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracings (NRFHT), cesarean delivery for other indications, and a composite of neonatal complications. To estimate average marginal effects (AMEs) in percentage points (pp) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of cesarean delivery between male and female physicians, we performed generalized estimating equations with Poisson distribution and exchange-correlation structure, adjusting for maternal, physician-level characteristics, and hospital-fixed effects.Of 108,004 individuals, 46,779 (43.3%) were attended by 183 female physicians, and 61,225 (56.7%) were attended by 250 male physicians. Female physicians were associated with a lower overall adjusted cesarean delivery proportion (11.93 vs. 13.47%; AME -1.54 pp [95% CI: -2.35, -0.73]), cesarean delivery for failure to progress (5.72 vs. 6.48%; AME -0.76 pp [95% CI: -1.24, -0.27]), and cesarean delivery for indications except for failure to progress or NRFHT (1.68 vs. 2.01%; AME -0.33 pp [95% CI: -0.56, -0.10]). There were no significant differences in cesarean outcomes for NRFHT or composite neonatal complications between male and female physicians.Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and develop targeted interventions. · Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery.. · This reduction was particularly evident for cesarean deliveries due to failure to progress.. · The reduction was not associated with an increased risk of neonatal complications..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信