Mia D Do, Jeremiah M Taylor, Thais Calderon, Abra H Shen, Jeffrey B Friedrich
{"title":"多样性在住院医师项目选择中的作用:从申请人到综合整形外科项目的见解。","authors":"Mia D Do, Jeremiah M Taylor, Thais Calderon, Abra H Shen, Jeffrey B Friedrich","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior research has identified criteria valued by residency applicants when assembling their rank lists. However, with the composition of medical trainees continuously diversifying, there has been greater emphasis on creating a physician cohort reflective of the general US census. This study aimed to evaluate if faculty/resident diversity has a similar influence as established program features on residency program selection for current applicants applying to plastic surgery residency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was administered to candidates of our institution's integrated plastic surgery residency program for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 application cycles to gather demographic data and rate the most impactful factors influencing rank list decisions. This was done using a Likert scale to rank program characteristics from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our survey response rate was 27% (180/673). Female and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) applicants ranked the presence of URiM faculty within a program ( P = 0.002, P = 0.022), URiM faculty in administrative positions ( P = 0.005, P = 0.012), residents identifying as the same race/ethnicity ( P = 0.001, P < 0.001), and program participation in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives ( P = 0.001, P = 0.003) as more important than their male and White counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although quality of life and perceived fit are universal priorities, female and URiM applicants placed higher importance on diverse faculty, resident representation, and program initiatives related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. These results suggest residency programs may appeal to more applicants by considering these factors in their future recruitment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"e31-e35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Diversity in Residency Program Selection: Insights From Applicants to Integrated Plastic Surgery Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Mia D Do, Jeremiah M Taylor, Thais Calderon, Abra H Shen, Jeffrey B Friedrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior research has identified criteria valued by residency applicants when assembling their rank lists. However, with the composition of medical trainees continuously diversifying, there has been greater emphasis on creating a physician cohort reflective of the general US census. This study aimed to evaluate if faculty/resident diversity has a similar influence as established program features on residency program selection for current applicants applying to plastic surgery residency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was administered to candidates of our institution's integrated plastic surgery residency program for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 application cycles to gather demographic data and rate the most impactful factors influencing rank list decisions. This was done using a Likert scale to rank program characteristics from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our survey response rate was 27% (180/673). Female and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) applicants ranked the presence of URiM faculty within a program ( P = 0.002, P = 0.022), URiM faculty in administrative positions ( P = 0.005, P = 0.012), residents identifying as the same race/ethnicity ( P = 0.001, P < 0.001), and program participation in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives ( P = 0.001, P = 0.003) as more important than their male and White counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although quality of life and perceived fit are universal priorities, female and URiM applicants placed higher importance on diverse faculty, resident representation, and program initiatives related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. These results suggest residency programs may appeal to more applicants by considering these factors in their future recruitment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e31-e35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004363\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:先前的研究已经确定了住院医师申请人在编制排名表时所重视的标准。然而,随着医学培训生的组成不断多样化,人们更加强调创建一个反映美国总体人口普查的医生队列。本研究旨在评估教师/住院医师多样性是否对当前申请整形外科住院医师的申请人的住院医师项目选择有类似的影响。方法:对我院2022-2023和2023-2024申请周期的综合整形外科住院医师项目的候选人进行调查,收集人口统计数据,并对影响排名决定的最重要因素进行评分。使用李克特量表将程序特征从1(不重要)到5(极其重要)进行排序。结果:调查回复率为27%(180/673)。女性和未被充分代表的医学申请者认为,与男性和白人申请者相比,URiM教员在项目中的存在(P = 0.002, P = 0.022)、URiM教员在行政职位上的存在(P = 0.005, P = 0.012)、相同种族/民族的居民(P = 0.001, P < 0.001)以及项目参与多样性、公平性和包容性倡议(P = 0.001, P = 0.003)更为重要。结论:尽管生活质量和感知契合度是普遍的优先事项,但女性和URiM申请者更重视多样化的教师、常驻代表以及与多样性、公平和包容性相关的项目倡议。这些结果表明,如果住院医师项目在未来的招聘策略中考虑到这些因素,可能会吸引更多的申请者。
The Role of Diversity in Residency Program Selection: Insights From Applicants to Integrated Plastic Surgery Programs.
Background: Prior research has identified criteria valued by residency applicants when assembling their rank lists. However, with the composition of medical trainees continuously diversifying, there has been greater emphasis on creating a physician cohort reflective of the general US census. This study aimed to evaluate if faculty/resident diversity has a similar influence as established program features on residency program selection for current applicants applying to plastic surgery residency.
Methods: A survey was administered to candidates of our institution's integrated plastic surgery residency program for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 application cycles to gather demographic data and rate the most impactful factors influencing rank list decisions. This was done using a Likert scale to rank program characteristics from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).
Results: Our survey response rate was 27% (180/673). Female and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) applicants ranked the presence of URiM faculty within a program ( P = 0.002, P = 0.022), URiM faculty in administrative positions ( P = 0.005, P = 0.012), residents identifying as the same race/ethnicity ( P = 0.001, P < 0.001), and program participation in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives ( P = 0.001, P = 0.003) as more important than their male and White counterparts.
Conclusions: Although quality of life and perceived fit are universal priorities, female and URiM applicants placed higher importance on diverse faculty, resident representation, and program initiatives related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. These results suggest residency programs may appeal to more applicants by considering these factors in their future recruitment strategies.
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.