通过机器学习增强诊断和术后结果预测:对非心脏和心脏手术的重点分析

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alexander Lombardo, Christopher Hannemann, Syme Aftab, Yashika Paul, Brandon Stretton, Ammar Zaka, Joshua Kovoor, Aashray Gupta, Stephen Bacchi
{"title":"通过机器学习增强诊断和术后结果预测:对非心脏和心脏手术的重点分析","authors":"Alexander Lombardo,&nbsp;Christopher Hannemann,&nbsp;Syme Aftab,&nbsp;Yashika Paul,&nbsp;Brandon Stretton,&nbsp;Ammar Zaka,&nbsp;Joshua Kovoor,&nbsp;Aashray Gupta,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi","doi":"10.1155/jocs/5521566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Traditional risk scoring tools have assisted to guide surgical practice for decades. Machine learning algorithms build upon this concept to allow dynamic and tailored patient information. These algorithms have been employed across most surgical specialties with multiple aims, including cost of care assessment, risk stratification, and prediction of procedural survival.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Paper selection was based on three main criteria: relevance, recency, and novelty. Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search of major databases, including PubMed and Scopus.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Machine learning algorithms pose significant advantages compared to traditional risk scoring tools. Across cardiac and noncardiac specialties, multiple studies have identified machine learning algorithms as superior to control or traditional scoring tools at diagnosis.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> In this focused analysis, we have identified the potential of machine learning to aid in diagnosis, management, and prediction of postoperative outcomes. Surgeons must continue to integrate machine learning into their practice with the aim of improving both patient and surgeon-based outcomes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jocs/5521566","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Diagnostic and Postoperative Outcome Predictions Through Machine Learning: A Focused Analysis on Noncardiac and Cardiac Surgeries\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Lombardo,&nbsp;Christopher Hannemann,&nbsp;Syme Aftab,&nbsp;Yashika Paul,&nbsp;Brandon Stretton,&nbsp;Ammar Zaka,&nbsp;Joshua Kovoor,&nbsp;Aashray Gupta,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jocs/5521566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> Traditional risk scoring tools have assisted to guide surgical practice for decades. Machine learning algorithms build upon this concept to allow dynamic and tailored patient information. These algorithms have been employed across most surgical specialties with multiple aims, including cost of care assessment, risk stratification, and prediction of procedural survival.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Paper selection was based on three main criteria: relevance, recency, and novelty. Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search of major databases, including PubMed and Scopus.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> Machine learning algorithms pose significant advantages compared to traditional risk scoring tools. Across cardiac and noncardiac specialties, multiple studies have identified machine learning algorithms as superior to control or traditional scoring tools at diagnosis.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> In this focused analysis, we have identified the potential of machine learning to aid in diagnosis, management, and prediction of postoperative outcomes. Surgeons must continue to integrate machine learning into their practice with the aim of improving both patient and surgeon-based outcomes.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Surgery\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jocs/5521566\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jocs/5521566\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jocs/5521566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:几十年来,传统的风险评分工具一直有助于指导外科实践。机器学习算法建立在这个概念之上,允许动态和定制的患者信息。这些算法已被用于大多数外科专业,具有多种目的,包括护理成本评估、风险分层和手术生存预测。方法:论文选择基于三个主要标准:相关性、近代性和新颖性。通过对PubMed和Scopus等主要数据库的全面检索,确定了相关研究。结果:与传统风险评分工具相比,机器学习算法具有显著优势。在心脏和非心脏专业,多项研究已经确定机器学习算法在诊断方面优于控制或传统评分工具。结论:在这项重点分析中,我们已经确定了机器学习在帮助诊断、管理和预测术后结果方面的潜力。外科医生必须继续将机器学习整合到他们的实践中,以改善患者和外科医生的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Diagnostic and Postoperative Outcome Predictions Through Machine Learning: A Focused Analysis on Noncardiac and Cardiac Surgeries

Background: Traditional risk scoring tools have assisted to guide surgical practice for decades. Machine learning algorithms build upon this concept to allow dynamic and tailored patient information. These algorithms have been employed across most surgical specialties with multiple aims, including cost of care assessment, risk stratification, and prediction of procedural survival.

Methods: Paper selection was based on three main criteria: relevance, recency, and novelty. Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search of major databases, including PubMed and Scopus.

Results: Machine learning algorithms pose significant advantages compared to traditional risk scoring tools. Across cardiac and noncardiac specialties, multiple studies have identified machine learning algorithms as superior to control or traditional scoring tools at diagnosis.

Conclusion: In this focused analysis, we have identified the potential of machine learning to aid in diagnosis, management, and prediction of postoperative outcomes. Surgeons must continue to integrate machine learning into their practice with the aim of improving both patient and surgeon-based outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
976
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Surgery (JCS) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to contemporary surgical treatment of cardiac disease. Renown for its detailed "how to" methods, JCS''s well-illustrated, concise technical articles, critical reviews and commentaries are highly valued by dedicated readers worldwide. With Editor-in-Chief Harold Lazar, MD and an internationally prominent editorial board, JCS continues its 20-year history as an important professional resource. Editorial coverage includes biologic support, mechanical cardiac assist and/or replacement and surgical techniques, and features current material on topics such as OPCAB surgery, stented and stentless valves, endovascular stent placement, atrial fibrillation, transplantation, percutaneous valve repair/replacement, left ventricular restoration surgery, immunobiology, and bridges to transplant and recovery. In addition, special sections (Images in Cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Regeneration) and historical reviews stimulate reader interest. The journal also routinely publishes proceedings of important international symposia in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信