从欧拉奇点的反常耗散到湍流的稳定有限元方法

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS
Niklas Fehn, Martin Kronbichler, Gert Lube
{"title":"从欧拉奇点的反常耗散到湍流的稳定有限元方法","authors":"Niklas Fehn,&nbsp;Martin Kronbichler,&nbsp;Gert Lube","doi":"10.1007/s10494-025-00639-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is well-known that kinetic energy produced artificially by an inadequate numerical discretization of nonlinear transport terms may lead to a blow-up of the numerical solution in simulations of fluid dynamical problems such as incompressible turbulent flows. However, the community seems to be divided whether this problem should be resolved by the use of discretely energy-preserving or dissipative discretization schemes. The rationale for discretely energy-preserving schemes is often based on the expectation of exact conservation of kinetic energy in the inviscid limit, which mathematically relies on the assumption of sufficient regularity of the solution. There is the (contradictory) phenomenological observation in turbulence that flows dissipate energy in the limit of vanishing molecular viscosity, an “anomalous” phenomenon termed dissipation anomaly or the zeroth law of turbulence. As already conjectured by Onsager, the Euler equations may dissipate kinetic energy through the formation of singularities of the velocity field. With the proof of Onsager’s conjecture in recent years, a consequence for designing numerical methods for turbulent flows is that the smoothness assumption behind conservation of energy in the inviscid limit becomes indeed critical for turbulent flows. The velocity field rather has to be expected to show singular behavior towards the inviscid limit, supporting the dissipation of kinetic energy. Our main argument is that designing numerical methods against the background of this physical behavior is a strong rationale for the construction of dissipative (or dissipation-aware) numerical schemes for convective terms. From that perspective, numerical dissipation does not appear artificial, but as an important ingredient to overcome problems introduced by energy-conserving numerical methods such as the inability to represent anomalous dissipation as well as the accumulation of energy in small scales, which is known as thermalization. This work discusses stabilized <span>\\(H^1\\)</span>, <span>\\(L^2\\)</span>, and <span>\\(H(\\mathrm{div})\\)</span>-conforming finite element methods for incompressible flows with a focus on the energy-stability of the numerical method and its dissipation mechanisms to predict inertial dissipation. Finally, we discuss the achievable convergence rate for the kinetic energy in under-resolved turbulent flow simulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"115 Simulation and Measurements","pages":"347 - 388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-025-00639-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Anomalous Dissipation Through Euler Singularities to Stabilized Finite Element Methods for Turbulent Flows\",\"authors\":\"Niklas Fehn,&nbsp;Martin Kronbichler,&nbsp;Gert Lube\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10494-025-00639-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It is well-known that kinetic energy produced artificially by an inadequate numerical discretization of nonlinear transport terms may lead to a blow-up of the numerical solution in simulations of fluid dynamical problems such as incompressible turbulent flows. However, the community seems to be divided whether this problem should be resolved by the use of discretely energy-preserving or dissipative discretization schemes. The rationale for discretely energy-preserving schemes is often based on the expectation of exact conservation of kinetic energy in the inviscid limit, which mathematically relies on the assumption of sufficient regularity of the solution. There is the (contradictory) phenomenological observation in turbulence that flows dissipate energy in the limit of vanishing molecular viscosity, an “anomalous” phenomenon termed dissipation anomaly or the zeroth law of turbulence. As already conjectured by Onsager, the Euler equations may dissipate kinetic energy through the formation of singularities of the velocity field. With the proof of Onsager’s conjecture in recent years, a consequence for designing numerical methods for turbulent flows is that the smoothness assumption behind conservation of energy in the inviscid limit becomes indeed critical for turbulent flows. The velocity field rather has to be expected to show singular behavior towards the inviscid limit, supporting the dissipation of kinetic energy. Our main argument is that designing numerical methods against the background of this physical behavior is a strong rationale for the construction of dissipative (or dissipation-aware) numerical schemes for convective terms. From that perspective, numerical dissipation does not appear artificial, but as an important ingredient to overcome problems introduced by energy-conserving numerical methods such as the inability to represent anomalous dissipation as well as the accumulation of energy in small scales, which is known as thermalization. This work discusses stabilized <span>\\\\(H^1\\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(L^2\\\\)</span>, and <span>\\\\(H(\\\\mathrm{div})\\\\)</span>-conforming finite element methods for incompressible flows with a focus on the energy-stability of the numerical method and its dissipation mechanisms to predict inertial dissipation. Finally, we discuss the achievable convergence rate for the kinetic energy in under-resolved turbulent flow simulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion\",\"volume\":\"115 Simulation and Measurements\",\"pages\":\"347 - 388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-025-00639-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-025-00639-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-025-00639-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,由于非线性输运项的数值离散化不充分而人为产生的动能,可能导致不可压缩湍流等流体动力学问题的数值解失效。然而,这个问题是否应该通过使用离散能量保存或耗散离散化方案来解决,社区似乎存在分歧。离散能量守恒方案的基本原理通常基于对无粘极限下动能精确守恒的期望,这在数学上依赖于对解的充分规则性的假设。在湍流中有一种(矛盾的)现象学观察,即流动在分子粘度消失的极限处耗散能量,这种“反常”现象称为耗散异常或湍流的第零定律。正如Onsager已经推测的那样,欧拉方程可以通过速度场奇点的形成来耗散动能。随着近年来Onsager猜想的证明,设计湍流数值方法的一个结果是,在无粘极限下能量守恒背后的平滑假设对于湍流确实变得至关重要。速度场在接近无粘极限时表现出奇异性,支持动能的耗散。我们的主要论点是,在这种物理行为的背景下设计数值方法是构建对流项耗散(或耗散感知)数值格式的有力依据。从这个角度来看,数值耗散并不是人为的,而是克服节能数值方法带来的问题的重要因素,例如无法表示异常耗散以及小尺度上的能量积累,即所谓的热化。本文讨论了稳定的\(H^1\), \(L^2\)和\(H(\mathrm{div})\) -符合的不可压缩流动有限元方法,重点是数值方法的能量稳定性及其耗散机制,以预测惯性耗散。最后,讨论了欠分辨湍流模拟中动能可达到的收敛速率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Anomalous Dissipation Through Euler Singularities to Stabilized Finite Element Methods for Turbulent Flows

It is well-known that kinetic energy produced artificially by an inadequate numerical discretization of nonlinear transport terms may lead to a blow-up of the numerical solution in simulations of fluid dynamical problems such as incompressible turbulent flows. However, the community seems to be divided whether this problem should be resolved by the use of discretely energy-preserving or dissipative discretization schemes. The rationale for discretely energy-preserving schemes is often based on the expectation of exact conservation of kinetic energy in the inviscid limit, which mathematically relies on the assumption of sufficient regularity of the solution. There is the (contradictory) phenomenological observation in turbulence that flows dissipate energy in the limit of vanishing molecular viscosity, an “anomalous” phenomenon termed dissipation anomaly or the zeroth law of turbulence. As already conjectured by Onsager, the Euler equations may dissipate kinetic energy through the formation of singularities of the velocity field. With the proof of Onsager’s conjecture in recent years, a consequence for designing numerical methods for turbulent flows is that the smoothness assumption behind conservation of energy in the inviscid limit becomes indeed critical for turbulent flows. The velocity field rather has to be expected to show singular behavior towards the inviscid limit, supporting the dissipation of kinetic energy. Our main argument is that designing numerical methods against the background of this physical behavior is a strong rationale for the construction of dissipative (or dissipation-aware) numerical schemes for convective terms. From that perspective, numerical dissipation does not appear artificial, but as an important ingredient to overcome problems introduced by energy-conserving numerical methods such as the inability to represent anomalous dissipation as well as the accumulation of energy in small scales, which is known as thermalization. This work discusses stabilized \(H^1\)\(L^2\), and \(H(\mathrm{div})\)-conforming finite element methods for incompressible flows with a focus on the energy-stability of the numerical method and its dissipation mechanisms to predict inertial dissipation. Finally, we discuss the achievable convergence rate for the kinetic energy in under-resolved turbulent flow simulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles. Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信