Long Chen , Desheng Li , Yonghui Chen , Yi Zhu , Kaizhe Shang
{"title":"人工固化结皮改善地基固结液-垂直排水","authors":"Long Chen , Desheng Li , Yonghui Chen , Yi Zhu , Kaizhe Shang","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For artificial solidified crust (ASC)–vertical drain ground, an analytical consolidation solution (IB solution: regarding ASC as an impervious boundary) is proposed, which considers both the radial and vertical seepage. The orthogonal relation is proven and the computing efficiency is greatly improved. Then, consolidation solutions applicable to ASC–vertical drain ground, include IB solution, RDL solution (radial consolidation solution of double-layered ground) by Li et al. (2025), the quasi-rigorous solution by Tang and Onitsuka (2001), are compared and discussed. Compared to the quasi-rigorous solution, IB solution slightly overestimates the consolidation rate, but it can be promoted in engineering according to the following reasons: a) the convergence is easier to be achieved; b) its accuracy is not affected by the ratio of the vertical time factor to the radial time factor; c) common major parameters of ASC (i.e., thickness and permeability) have little effect on the applicability. By ignoring the vertical seepage in soil, IB solution degenerates to the simplified solution. Consolidation rate calculated by the simplified solution is slower than that of IB solution, and the solution can be a simple method for estimating the consolidation behavior of ASC–vertical drain ground.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 5","pages":"Pages 1145-1155"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consolidation solution of ground improved with artificial solidified crust–vertical drain\",\"authors\":\"Long Chen , Desheng Li , Yonghui Chen , Yi Zhu , Kaizhe Shang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>For artificial solidified crust (ASC)–vertical drain ground, an analytical consolidation solution (IB solution: regarding ASC as an impervious boundary) is proposed, which considers both the radial and vertical seepage. The orthogonal relation is proven and the computing efficiency is greatly improved. Then, consolidation solutions applicable to ASC–vertical drain ground, include IB solution, RDL solution (radial consolidation solution of double-layered ground) by Li et al. (2025), the quasi-rigorous solution by Tang and Onitsuka (2001), are compared and discussed. Compared to the quasi-rigorous solution, IB solution slightly overestimates the consolidation rate, but it can be promoted in engineering according to the following reasons: a) the convergence is easier to be achieved; b) its accuracy is not affected by the ratio of the vertical time factor to the radial time factor; c) common major parameters of ASC (i.e., thickness and permeability) have little effect on the applicability. By ignoring the vertical seepage in soil, IB solution degenerates to the simplified solution. Consolidation rate calculated by the simplified solution is slower than that of IB solution, and the solution can be a simple method for estimating the consolidation behavior of ASC–vertical drain ground.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1145-1155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000561\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000561","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consolidation solution of ground improved with artificial solidified crust–vertical drain
For artificial solidified crust (ASC)–vertical drain ground, an analytical consolidation solution (IB solution: regarding ASC as an impervious boundary) is proposed, which considers both the radial and vertical seepage. The orthogonal relation is proven and the computing efficiency is greatly improved. Then, consolidation solutions applicable to ASC–vertical drain ground, include IB solution, RDL solution (radial consolidation solution of double-layered ground) by Li et al. (2025), the quasi-rigorous solution by Tang and Onitsuka (2001), are compared and discussed. Compared to the quasi-rigorous solution, IB solution slightly overestimates the consolidation rate, but it can be promoted in engineering according to the following reasons: a) the convergence is easier to be achieved; b) its accuracy is not affected by the ratio of the vertical time factor to the radial time factor; c) common major parameters of ASC (i.e., thickness and permeability) have little effect on the applicability. By ignoring the vertical seepage in soil, IB solution degenerates to the simplified solution. Consolidation rate calculated by the simplified solution is slower than that of IB solution, and the solution can be a simple method for estimating the consolidation behavior of ASC–vertical drain ground.
期刊介绍:
The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.