Dalraj Dhillon, Paary Balakumar, Prushoth Vivekanantha, Amit Meena, Shahbaz Malik, Darren de Sa
{"title":"研究髌股内侧韧带重建治疗髌骨不稳的随机对照试验的高连续脆性指数值：一项系统综述。","authors":"Dalraj Dhillon, Paary Balakumar, Prushoth Vivekanantha, Amit Meena, Shahbaz Malik, Darren de Sa","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the statistical fragility of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) of patients with patellar instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for RCTs investigating surgical management of patients with patellar instability from inception to 25 April 2024. Studies that reported over one significant dichotomous outcome, significant continuous outcome, and/or nonsignificant dichotomous outcome were included for analysis. The fragility index (FI), continuous fragility index (CFI) and reverse fragility index (RFI) were calculated for significant dichotomous outcomes, significant continuous outcomes, and non-significant dichotomous outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen RCTs were included which reported on a total of 929 patients (64.1% female, mean age of 24.4 years [range: 10-47 years] before any patients were lost to follow-up. The median FI was 1.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.725-2.275; range, 0-4). The number of patients lost to follow-up at the final time point was greater than the study-specific FI in 7 out of 8 outcomes from four studies (87.5%). The overall median CFI for included RCTs amongst 31 outcomes from nine studies was 11.7 (IQR, 12.9-95% CI, 8.9-13.9; range 0-30.3). The number of patients lost to follow-up at the final time point was greater than the study-specific CFI in thirteen outcomes from six studies (41.9%). The median RFI was 7.0 (IQR, 1.0; 95% CI, 6.5-7.5). The number of participants lost to follow-up was greater than the study-specific RFI in a single outcome from one study (16.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review shows that while FI was low at a median of 1.0, consistent with RCTs in sports medicine, the other indicators of statistical fragility were relatively high, especially CFI (11.7). The level of fragility should be taken into account when assessing practical applicability of RCTs on patellar instability, in combination with other indicators of study rigour.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High continuous fragility index values for randomised controlled trials investigating medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar instability: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Dalraj Dhillon, Paary Balakumar, Prushoth Vivekanantha, Amit Meena, Shahbaz Malik, Darren de Sa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the statistical fragility of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) of patients with patellar instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for RCTs investigating surgical management of patients with patellar instability from inception to 25 April 2024. Studies that reported over one significant dichotomous outcome, significant continuous outcome, and/or nonsignificant dichotomous outcome were included for analysis. The fragility index (FI), continuous fragility index (CFI) and reverse fragility index (RFI) were calculated for significant dichotomous outcomes, significant continuous outcomes, and non-significant dichotomous outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen RCTs were included which reported on a total of 929 patients (64.1% female, mean age of 24.4 years [range: 10-47 years] before any patients were lost to follow-up. The median FI was 1.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.725-2.275; range, 0-4). The number of patients lost to follow-up at the final time point was greater than the study-specific FI in 7 out of 8 outcomes from four studies (87.5%). The overall median CFI for included RCTs amongst 31 outcomes from nine studies was 11.7 (IQR, 12.9-95% CI, 8.9-13.9; range 0-30.3). The number of patients lost to follow-up at the final time point was greater than the study-specific CFI in thirteen outcomes from six studies (41.9%). The median RFI was 7.0 (IQR, 1.0; 95% CI, 6.5-7.5). The number of participants lost to follow-up was greater than the study-specific RFI in a single outcome from one study (16.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review shows that while FI was low at a median of 1.0, consistent with RCTs in sports medicine, the other indicators of statistical fragility were relatively high, especially CFI (11.7). The level of fragility should be taken into account when assessing practical applicability of RCTs on patellar instability, in combination with other indicators of study rigour.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
High continuous fragility index values for randomised controlled trials investigating medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar instability: A systematic review.
Purpose: To evaluate the statistical fragility of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) of patients with patellar instability.
Methods: A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for RCTs investigating surgical management of patients with patellar instability from inception to 25 April 2024. Studies that reported over one significant dichotomous outcome, significant continuous outcome, and/or nonsignificant dichotomous outcome were included for analysis. The fragility index (FI), continuous fragility index (CFI) and reverse fragility index (RFI) were calculated for significant dichotomous outcomes, significant continuous outcomes, and non-significant dichotomous outcomes, respectively.
Results: Thirteen RCTs were included which reported on a total of 929 patients (64.1% female, mean age of 24.4 years [range: 10-47 years] before any patients were lost to follow-up. The median FI was 1.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.725-2.275; range, 0-4). The number of patients lost to follow-up at the final time point was greater than the study-specific FI in 7 out of 8 outcomes from four studies (87.5%). The overall median CFI for included RCTs amongst 31 outcomes from nine studies was 11.7 (IQR, 12.9-95% CI, 8.9-13.9; range 0-30.3). The number of patients lost to follow-up at the final time point was greater than the study-specific CFI in thirteen outcomes from six studies (41.9%). The median RFI was 7.0 (IQR, 1.0; 95% CI, 6.5-7.5). The number of participants lost to follow-up was greater than the study-specific RFI in a single outcome from one study (16.7%).
Conclusion: This systematic review shows that while FI was low at a median of 1.0, consistent with RCTs in sports medicine, the other indicators of statistical fragility were relatively high, especially CFI (11.7). The level of fragility should be taken into account when assessing practical applicability of RCTs on patellar instability, in combination with other indicators of study rigour.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
