Giancarlo Giurazza, Andrea Tanzilli, Edoardo Franceschetti, Stefano Campi, Pietro Gregori, Francesco Rosario Parisi, Michele Paciotti, Giovanni Perricone, Biagio Zampogna, Rocco Papalia
{"title":"膝关节表型分布的冠状面排列随着地理、骨关节炎和性别相关因素的功能而显著变化：一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Giancarlo Giurazza, Andrea Tanzilli, Edoardo Franceschetti, Stefano Campi, Pietro Gregori, Francesco Rosario Parisi, Michele Paciotti, Giovanni Perricone, Biagio Zampogna, Rocco Papalia","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification is a nine-phenotype matrix based on limb alignment and joint line obliquity. This study aimed to provide a global overview of CPAK distribution, hypothesising significant geographic, osteoarthritic and sex-related variations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search (Embase, Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Library) following PRISMA guidelines was conducted, utilising the search terms \"Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee\" OR \"CPAK\". Studies considering image modalities other than long-leg radiographs were excluded. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 studies comprising 46,966 knees were analysed. The most common phenotypes worldwide were CPAK I (33.1%), II (25.9%) and III (14.4%) in the osteoarthritic population and CPAK II (34.9%), I (21.5%) and III (19.3%) in the healthy population. Among osteoarthritic populations, CPAK type I was predominant in Europe (29.2%), Asia (41.9%) and America (33.6%), type II in Australia (32.6%) and type III in Africa (28.6%). In healthy populations, type II was predominant in Europe (42.8%) and Asia (35.3%), whereas type I was most common in South America (44.8%). Significant regional differences were observed among both osteoarthritic and healthy knees, and between osteoarthritic and healthy knees in individual countries. In Europe, significant sex differences were observed in the distribution of types I (39.1% M; 23.5% F) and III (11.4% M; 24.6% F) in the osteoarthritic population, and in the distribution of types I (26.7% M; 9.4% F), II (43.9% M; 34.4% F) and III (11.3% M; 20.6% F) in the healthy population. In Asia, significant sex differences were found for type III in osteoarthritic knees (6.3% M; 11.4% F).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPAK distribution varies significantly as a function of geographic, osteoarthritic, and sex-related factors. A personalised approach to TKA may be desirable to better accommodate these differences.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronal plane alignment of the knee phenotypes distribution varies significantly as a function of geographic, osteoarthritic and sex-related factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Giancarlo Giurazza, Andrea Tanzilli, Edoardo Franceschetti, Stefano Campi, Pietro Gregori, Francesco Rosario Parisi, Michele Paciotti, Giovanni Perricone, Biagio Zampogna, Rocco Papalia\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification is a nine-phenotype matrix based on limb alignment and joint line obliquity. This study aimed to provide a global overview of CPAK distribution, hypothesising significant geographic, osteoarthritic and sex-related variations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search (Embase, Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Library) following PRISMA guidelines was conducted, utilising the search terms \\\"Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee\\\" OR \\\"CPAK\\\". Studies considering image modalities other than long-leg radiographs were excluded. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 studies comprising 46,966 knees were analysed. The most common phenotypes worldwide were CPAK I (33.1%), II (25.9%) and III (14.4%) in the osteoarthritic population and CPAK II (34.9%), I (21.5%) and III (19.3%) in the healthy population. Among osteoarthritic populations, CPAK type I was predominant in Europe (29.2%), Asia (41.9%) and America (33.6%), type II in Australia (32.6%) and type III in Africa (28.6%). In healthy populations, type II was predominant in Europe (42.8%) and Asia (35.3%), whereas type I was most common in South America (44.8%). Significant regional differences were observed among both osteoarthritic and healthy knees, and between osteoarthritic and healthy knees in individual countries. In Europe, significant sex differences were observed in the distribution of types I (39.1% M; 23.5% F) and III (11.4% M; 24.6% F) in the osteoarthritic population, and in the distribution of types I (26.7% M; 9.4% F), II (43.9% M; 34.4% F) and III (11.3% M; 20.6% F) in the healthy population. In Asia, significant sex differences were found for type III in osteoarthritic knees (6.3% M; 11.4% F).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPAK distribution varies significantly as a function of geographic, osteoarthritic, and sex-related factors. A personalised approach to TKA may be desirable to better accommodate these differences.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coronal plane alignment of the knee phenotypes distribution varies significantly as a function of geographic, osteoarthritic and sex-related factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: The coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification is a nine-phenotype matrix based on limb alignment and joint line obliquity. This study aimed to provide a global overview of CPAK distribution, hypothesising significant geographic, osteoarthritic and sex-related variations.
Methods: A systematic literature search (Embase, Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Library) following PRISMA guidelines was conducted, utilising the search terms "Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee" OR "CPAK". Studies considering image modalities other than long-leg radiographs were excluded. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Results: A total of 38 studies comprising 46,966 knees were analysed. The most common phenotypes worldwide were CPAK I (33.1%), II (25.9%) and III (14.4%) in the osteoarthritic population and CPAK II (34.9%), I (21.5%) and III (19.3%) in the healthy population. Among osteoarthritic populations, CPAK type I was predominant in Europe (29.2%), Asia (41.9%) and America (33.6%), type II in Australia (32.6%) and type III in Africa (28.6%). In healthy populations, type II was predominant in Europe (42.8%) and Asia (35.3%), whereas type I was most common in South America (44.8%). Significant regional differences were observed among both osteoarthritic and healthy knees, and between osteoarthritic and healthy knees in individual countries. In Europe, significant sex differences were observed in the distribution of types I (39.1% M; 23.5% F) and III (11.4% M; 24.6% F) in the osteoarthritic population, and in the distribution of types I (26.7% M; 9.4% F), II (43.9% M; 34.4% F) and III (11.3% M; 20.6% F) in the healthy population. In Asia, significant sex differences were found for type III in osteoarthritic knees (6.3% M; 11.4% F).
Conclusion: CPAK distribution varies significantly as a function of geographic, osteoarthritic, and sex-related factors. A personalised approach to TKA may be desirable to better accommodate these differences.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
