后阿萨德叙利亚教学医院临床学习环境的恢复:PHEEM分析与建议

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20955.1
Ghaith Alfakhry, Rama Kodmani, Munir Ghandour, Amer Al Munajjed, Rawan Khwanda
{"title":"后阿萨德叙利亚教学医院临床学习环境的恢复:PHEEM分析与建议","authors":"Ghaith Alfakhry, Rama Kodmani, Munir Ghandour, Amer Al Munajjed, Rawan Khwanda","doi":"10.12688/mep.20955.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>After 54 years of Assad's family dictatorship, Syria was finally free but, nonetheless, was in ruins. The health profession education training system is no exception, and there have been many indicators of this in the literature, but none of them have provided a systematic evaluation of the clinical learning environment (CLE) using validated approaches. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate CLE at teaching hospitals in Damascus, Syria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted in Damascus, Syria, during mid-2023, before Assad's regime collapsed. The study population included all resident doctors working and training at any teaching hospital in Damascus. We used the recently validated 36-item PHEEM inventory as a data collection tool and added 10 extra items related to Syria's specific context. There was also one open-ended question. We recruited participants from 14 different teaching hospitals using nonprobability sampling techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1490 residents from 31 medical specialties participated in the study, which was approximately 37% of the total population at that time. The female participants comprised 50.7% (n=754) of the total sample. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.925. The total PHEEM mean score was 72.4±21.4 (Max. 144). All the PHEEM domains showed significant shortcomings, except for learner engagement and social participation. The worst-scoring domains were external regulation, work culture, and living conditions, with scores of 48.5%, 40.8%, and 31.2%, respectively. The results of the additional 10 war-related items were important. One item showed that only 14% of respondents did not have plans to migrate. The written comments re-echo some of the PHEEM findings in more context.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study draws a roadmap for clinical educators, lawmakers, and new leaders to make targeted reforms and investments to restore the clinical learning environment. There are major issues that not only render training residents suboptimal but also compromise residents' and patients' safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"15 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restoring the Clinical Learning Environment at Teaching Hospitals in Post-Assad Syria: A PHEEM Analysis and Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Ghaith Alfakhry, Rama Kodmani, Munir Ghandour, Amer Al Munajjed, Rawan Khwanda\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.20955.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>After 54 years of Assad's family dictatorship, Syria was finally free but, nonetheless, was in ruins. The health profession education training system is no exception, and there have been many indicators of this in the literature, but none of them have provided a systematic evaluation of the clinical learning environment (CLE) using validated approaches. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate CLE at teaching hospitals in Damascus, Syria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted in Damascus, Syria, during mid-2023, before Assad's regime collapsed. The study population included all resident doctors working and training at any teaching hospital in Damascus. We used the recently validated 36-item PHEEM inventory as a data collection tool and added 10 extra items related to Syria's specific context. There was also one open-ended question. We recruited participants from 14 different teaching hospitals using nonprobability sampling techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1490 residents from 31 medical specialties participated in the study, which was approximately 37% of the total population at that time. The female participants comprised 50.7% (n=754) of the total sample. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.925. The total PHEEM mean score was 72.4±21.4 (Max. 144). All the PHEEM domains showed significant shortcomings, except for learner engagement and social participation. The worst-scoring domains were external regulation, work culture, and living conditions, with scores of 48.5%, 40.8%, and 31.2%, respectively. The results of the additional 10 war-related items were important. One item showed that only 14% of respondents did not have plans to migrate. The written comments re-echo some of the PHEEM findings in more context.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study draws a roadmap for clinical educators, lawmakers, and new leaders to make targeted reforms and investments to restore the clinical learning environment. There are major issues that not only render training residents suboptimal but also compromise residents' and patients' safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20955.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20955.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在阿萨德家族54年的独裁统治之后,叙利亚终于获得了自由,但尽管如此,还是一片废墟。卫生专业教育培训系统也不例外,文献中有许多指标,但没有一个使用经过验证的方法对临床学习环境(CLE)提供系统的评估。因此,本研究旨在评估叙利亚大马士革教学医院的CLE。方法:这项横断面研究是在阿萨德政权垮台之前的2023年中期在叙利亚大马士革进行的。研究人群包括在大马士革任何教学医院工作和培训的所有住院医生。我们使用了最近验证的36项PHEEM清单作为数据收集工具,并增加了10项与叙利亚具体情况相关的额外项目。还有一个开放式问题。我们使用非概率抽样技术从14个不同的教学医院招募参与者。结果:共有来自31个医学专科的1490名住院医师参与了研究,约占当时总人口的37%。女性参与者占总样本的50.7% (n=754)。Cronbach’s alpha为0.925。总PHEEM平均评分为72.4±21.4分(Max. 144)。除了学习者参与和社会参与外,所有的PHEEM领域都表现出显著的缺陷。得分最差的领域是外部监管、工作文化和生活条件,得分分别为48.5%、40.8%和31.2%。另外10个与战争有关的项目的结果很重要。一项调查显示,只有14%的受访者没有移民计划。书面评论在更多的背景下再次回应了PHEEM的一些发现。讨论:本研究为临床教育者、立法者和新领导人制定了路线图,以进行有针对性的改革和投资,以恢复临床学习环境。这些主要问题不仅使住院医师培训不理想,而且危及住院医师和患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restoring the Clinical Learning Environment at Teaching Hospitals in Post-Assad Syria: A PHEEM Analysis and Recommendations.

Introduction: After 54 years of Assad's family dictatorship, Syria was finally free but, nonetheless, was in ruins. The health profession education training system is no exception, and there have been many indicators of this in the literature, but none of them have provided a systematic evaluation of the clinical learning environment (CLE) using validated approaches. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate CLE at teaching hospitals in Damascus, Syria.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Damascus, Syria, during mid-2023, before Assad's regime collapsed. The study population included all resident doctors working and training at any teaching hospital in Damascus. We used the recently validated 36-item PHEEM inventory as a data collection tool and added 10 extra items related to Syria's specific context. There was also one open-ended question. We recruited participants from 14 different teaching hospitals using nonprobability sampling techniques.

Results: A total of 1490 residents from 31 medical specialties participated in the study, which was approximately 37% of the total population at that time. The female participants comprised 50.7% (n=754) of the total sample. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.925. The total PHEEM mean score was 72.4±21.4 (Max. 144). All the PHEEM domains showed significant shortcomings, except for learner engagement and social participation. The worst-scoring domains were external regulation, work culture, and living conditions, with scores of 48.5%, 40.8%, and 31.2%, respectively. The results of the additional 10 war-related items were important. One item showed that only 14% of respondents did not have plans to migrate. The written comments re-echo some of the PHEEM findings in more context.

Discussion: This study draws a roadmap for clinical educators, lawmakers, and new leaders to make targeted reforms and investments to restore the clinical learning environment. There are major issues that not only render training residents suboptimal but also compromise residents' and patients' safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信