Fernando Verdugo, Antonio D'Addona, Theresia Laksmana, Agurne Uribarri
{"title":"骨膜引导下的骨再生对严重损伤的骨臼同时植入:皮质屏蔽横断面研究。","authors":"Fernando Verdugo, Antonio D'Addona, Theresia Laksmana, Agurne Uribarri","doi":"10.1002/cap.10364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement in severely damaged sockets are challenging and may require multiple grafting. Periosteal-guided bone regeneration enhances osteogenesis and wound healing shortening immediate and delay implant protocols. Clinical outcomes of a group of individuals that entered a longitudinal clinical trial from 2019 to 2021 are reported describing a novel surgical approach of simultaneous reconstruction and implant placement.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Eight individuals requiring an implant and presenting severe facial bone loss were followed for 2-4 years (37-month average) after the completion of a 12-month longitudinal clinical trial NCT04827693. Socket reconstruction and simultaneous implant placement were performed by encasing the implant in a customized shield of autogenous cortical bone. Peri-implant tissues and pink esthetics data were assessed following established success criteria. Mean healing time, before second stage surgery, after implant placement and reconstruction, was 12.5 ± 0.9 weeks (range: 12-14 weeks). Success rates were 100% at 2-4 years. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data showed stable facial cortical bone >2.1 mm in thickness. Pink esthetic scores (PESs) were above optimal (9.5 ± 0.5, range: 9-10), with no significant difference between delayed and immediate individuals (p > 0.05). Facial implant transparency at follow-up was absent and all had a band of keratinized tissue >2 mm with healthy probing depths ranging from 3 to 4 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Facial bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement are feasible through periosteal-guided bone regeneration after a short healing period in severely damaged sockets following immediate or delay protocols. The assisted regenerated intrasocket bone provides high pink esthetics and functional implant stability.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Regeneration and simultaneous implant placement of severely damaged sockets is feasible. Periosteal-guide bone regeneration can shorten healing times. Teeth with fragile alveolar foundation can be successfully reconstructed achieving high pink esthetics.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Simultaneous dental implant placement and bone regeneration are possible in severely damaged sockets that require reconstruction achieving, after a short healing period, highly esthetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Periosteal-guided bone regeneration on severely damaged sockets with simultaneous implant placement: The cortical shield cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Verdugo, Antonio D'Addona, Theresia Laksmana, Agurne Uribarri\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cap.10364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement in severely damaged sockets are challenging and may require multiple grafting. Periosteal-guided bone regeneration enhances osteogenesis and wound healing shortening immediate and delay implant protocols. Clinical outcomes of a group of individuals that entered a longitudinal clinical trial from 2019 to 2021 are reported describing a novel surgical approach of simultaneous reconstruction and implant placement.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Eight individuals requiring an implant and presenting severe facial bone loss were followed for 2-4 years (37-month average) after the completion of a 12-month longitudinal clinical trial NCT04827693. Socket reconstruction and simultaneous implant placement were performed by encasing the implant in a customized shield of autogenous cortical bone. Peri-implant tissues and pink esthetics data were assessed following established success criteria. Mean healing time, before second stage surgery, after implant placement and reconstruction, was 12.5 ± 0.9 weeks (range: 12-14 weeks). Success rates were 100% at 2-4 years. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data showed stable facial cortical bone >2.1 mm in thickness. Pink esthetic scores (PESs) were above optimal (9.5 ± 0.5, range: 9-10), with no significant difference between delayed and immediate individuals (p > 0.05). Facial implant transparency at follow-up was absent and all had a band of keratinized tissue >2 mm with healthy probing depths ranging from 3 to 4 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Facial bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement are feasible through periosteal-guided bone regeneration after a short healing period in severely damaged sockets following immediate or delay protocols. The assisted regenerated intrasocket bone provides high pink esthetics and functional implant stability.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Regeneration and simultaneous implant placement of severely damaged sockets is feasible. Periosteal-guide bone regeneration can shorten healing times. Teeth with fragile alveolar foundation can be successfully reconstructed achieving high pink esthetics.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Simultaneous dental implant placement and bone regeneration are possible in severely damaged sockets that require reconstruction achieving, after a short healing period, highly esthetic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Advances in Periodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Advances in Periodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Periosteal-guided bone regeneration on severely damaged sockets with simultaneous implant placement: The cortical shield cross-sectional study.
Background: Bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement in severely damaged sockets are challenging and may require multiple grafting. Periosteal-guided bone regeneration enhances osteogenesis and wound healing shortening immediate and delay implant protocols. Clinical outcomes of a group of individuals that entered a longitudinal clinical trial from 2019 to 2021 are reported describing a novel surgical approach of simultaneous reconstruction and implant placement.
Methods and results: Eight individuals requiring an implant and presenting severe facial bone loss were followed for 2-4 years (37-month average) after the completion of a 12-month longitudinal clinical trial NCT04827693. Socket reconstruction and simultaneous implant placement were performed by encasing the implant in a customized shield of autogenous cortical bone. Peri-implant tissues and pink esthetics data were assessed following established success criteria. Mean healing time, before second stage surgery, after implant placement and reconstruction, was 12.5 ± 0.9 weeks (range: 12-14 weeks). Success rates were 100% at 2-4 years. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data showed stable facial cortical bone >2.1 mm in thickness. Pink esthetic scores (PESs) were above optimal (9.5 ± 0.5, range: 9-10), with no significant difference between delayed and immediate individuals (p > 0.05). Facial implant transparency at follow-up was absent and all had a band of keratinized tissue >2 mm with healthy probing depths ranging from 3 to 4 mm.
Conclusion: Facial bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement are feasible through periosteal-guided bone regeneration after a short healing period in severely damaged sockets following immediate or delay protocols. The assisted regenerated intrasocket bone provides high pink esthetics and functional implant stability.
Key points: Regeneration and simultaneous implant placement of severely damaged sockets is feasible. Periosteal-guide bone regeneration can shorten healing times. Teeth with fragile alveolar foundation can be successfully reconstructed achieving high pink esthetics.
Plain language summary: Simultaneous dental implant placement and bone regeneration are possible in severely damaged sockets that require reconstruction achieving, after a short healing period, highly esthetic outcomes.