Emma M Achola, Shelley A Jazowski, Lauren Hersch Nicholas, Laura M Keohane, William A Wood, Christopher R Friese, Stacie B Dusetzina
{"title":"评估65岁以下医疗保险受益人获得医疗服务的机会。","authors":"Emma M Achola, Shelley A Jazowski, Lauren Hersch Nicholas, Laura M Keohane, William A Wood, Christopher R Friese, Stacie B Dusetzina","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals younger than 65 years can qualify for Medicare if they have long-term disabilities or certain qualifying conditions. These beneficiaries-particularly the non-dual-eligible population-may experience cost and access barriers to medical care. We examined the association between Medicare coverage type and reported barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Multivariable linear probability models assessed the association between self-reported Medicare coverage and patient-reported outcomes by dual-eligibility status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2012-2020 data from the Health and Retirement Study, we compared self-reported sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of non-dual-eligible and dual-eligible beneficiaries aged 50 to 64 years by Medicare coverage type at their baseline interview. We then examined the following self-reported outcomes: experiencing cost-related medication nonadherence, delaying care due to cost, not having a usual source of care, and having trouble finding a doctor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, enrollment in traditional Medicare (TM) plus supplemental coverage vs TM with no supplemental coverage was associated with lower reported rates of experiencing cost-related medication nonadherence (-7.5 percentage point [PP] change; 95% CI, -12.1 to -3.0), delaying care due to cost (-9.8 PP; 95% CI, -13.3 to -6.3), and having no usual source of care (-5.5 PP; 95% CI, -8.9 to -2.1). Compared with TM with no supplement, Medicare Advantage enrollment was associated with lower rates of delaying care due to cost (-4.2 PP; 95% CI, -7.6 to -0.7) and having no usual source of care (-5.2 PP; 95% CI, -8.2 to -2.3). Among dual-eligible beneficiaries, outcomes largely did not differ by coverage type. Switching from traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage was associated with trouble finding a doctor for dual-eligible beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enrollment in less generous Medicare coverage was associated with greater cost and access barriers to care for beneficiaries younger than 65 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 5","pages":"222-229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating access to care for Medicare beneficiaries younger than 65 Years.\",\"authors\":\"Emma M Achola, Shelley A Jazowski, Lauren Hersch Nicholas, Laura M Keohane, William A Wood, Christopher R Friese, Stacie B Dusetzina\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals younger than 65 years can qualify for Medicare if they have long-term disabilities or certain qualifying conditions. These beneficiaries-particularly the non-dual-eligible population-may experience cost and access barriers to medical care. We examined the association between Medicare coverage type and reported barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Multivariable linear probability models assessed the association between self-reported Medicare coverage and patient-reported outcomes by dual-eligibility status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2012-2020 data from the Health and Retirement Study, we compared self-reported sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of non-dual-eligible and dual-eligible beneficiaries aged 50 to 64 years by Medicare coverage type at their baseline interview. We then examined the following self-reported outcomes: experiencing cost-related medication nonadherence, delaying care due to cost, not having a usual source of care, and having trouble finding a doctor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, enrollment in traditional Medicare (TM) plus supplemental coverage vs TM with no supplemental coverage was associated with lower reported rates of experiencing cost-related medication nonadherence (-7.5 percentage point [PP] change; 95% CI, -12.1 to -3.0), delaying care due to cost (-9.8 PP; 95% CI, -13.3 to -6.3), and having no usual source of care (-5.5 PP; 95% CI, -8.9 to -2.1). Compared with TM with no supplement, Medicare Advantage enrollment was associated with lower rates of delaying care due to cost (-4.2 PP; 95% CI, -7.6 to -0.7) and having no usual source of care (-5.2 PP; 95% CI, -8.2 to -2.3). Among dual-eligible beneficiaries, outcomes largely did not differ by coverage type. Switching from traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage was associated with trouble finding a doctor for dual-eligible beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enrollment in less generous Medicare coverage was associated with greater cost and access barriers to care for beneficiaries younger than 65 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"222-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231181/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89732\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating access to care for Medicare beneficiaries younger than 65 Years.
Objectives: Individuals younger than 65 years can qualify for Medicare if they have long-term disabilities or certain qualifying conditions. These beneficiaries-particularly the non-dual-eligible population-may experience cost and access barriers to medical care. We examined the association between Medicare coverage type and reported barriers to care.
Study design: Multivariable linear probability models assessed the association between self-reported Medicare coverage and patient-reported outcomes by dual-eligibility status.
Methods: Using 2012-2020 data from the Health and Retirement Study, we compared self-reported sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of non-dual-eligible and dual-eligible beneficiaries aged 50 to 64 years by Medicare coverage type at their baseline interview. We then examined the following self-reported outcomes: experiencing cost-related medication nonadherence, delaying care due to cost, not having a usual source of care, and having trouble finding a doctor.
Results: Among non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, enrollment in traditional Medicare (TM) plus supplemental coverage vs TM with no supplemental coverage was associated with lower reported rates of experiencing cost-related medication nonadherence (-7.5 percentage point [PP] change; 95% CI, -12.1 to -3.0), delaying care due to cost (-9.8 PP; 95% CI, -13.3 to -6.3), and having no usual source of care (-5.5 PP; 95% CI, -8.9 to -2.1). Compared with TM with no supplement, Medicare Advantage enrollment was associated with lower rates of delaying care due to cost (-4.2 PP; 95% CI, -7.6 to -0.7) and having no usual source of care (-5.2 PP; 95% CI, -8.2 to -2.3). Among dual-eligible beneficiaries, outcomes largely did not differ by coverage type. Switching from traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage was associated with trouble finding a doctor for dual-eligible beneficiaries.
Conclusions: Enrollment in less generous Medicare coverage was associated with greater cost and access barriers to care for beneficiaries younger than 65 years.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.