卢森堡:卫生系统审查。

Q1 Medicine
Health systems in transition Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Katharina Rausch, Catherine Goetzinger, Anne-Charlotte Lorcy, Béatrice Durvy, Juliane Winkelmann, Michelle Falkenbach
{"title":"卢森堡:卫生系统审查。","authors":"Katharina Rausch, Catherine Goetzinger, Anne-Charlotte Lorcy, Béatrice Durvy, Juliane Winkelmann, Michelle Falkenbach","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review of Luxembourg's health system analyses the country's health organization and governance, financing, health care provision, recent developments and reforms, as well as the system's performance. Luxembourg's statutory health insurance system ensures a comprehensive benefits basket for a large share of the population. Although health care accessibility is high in Luxembourg, administrative considerations, such as the requirement to possess an official address or the lack of automatic third-party payment mechanisms for several services, still constitute significant barriers for vulnerable populations to access care. Overall, Luxembourg performs well on health outcomes, although indicators on behavioural risk factors and socioeconomic disparities remain sources of concern given their adverse impact on population health. Historically, Luxembourg's health system legislation has been fragmented but the recent merger in 2023 of two ministries to compose the Ministry of Health and Social Security (known by the abbreviation M3S) sets a path towards more cohesive health care planning, legislation and financing. Nevertheless, elements of accountability and transparency in health policy-making still pose important challenges. Considering its small size, Luxembourg's health care system is highly centralized and the health infrastructure is well distributed. However, the country relies heavily on a foreign-trained health workforce, which raises concerns about the accessibility of care and may undermine the maintenance of high standards of quality of care for complex medical procedures if the retention of skilled medical professionals is not safeguarded. Hence, Luxembourg has been focusing on developing further initial education programmes for its health professionals, as well as developing a digital health care workforce registry and legal framework to encourage multiprofessional collaboration and task-shifting opportunities. Finally, despite efforts to enhance the sustainability of the health system via reforms for better cost containment, increased investments in preventive services and refinement of hospital services, overall efficiency could be improved. Luxembourg has one of the highest per capita expenditures on health compared with other countries with similar health system and population health outcomes and lacks a mechanism for priority setting in budget allocation, incentives for efficiency improvements, and an enhanced focus on prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":38995,"journal":{"name":"Health systems in transition","volume":"26 4","pages":"1-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Luxembourg: Health System Review.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Rausch, Catherine Goetzinger, Anne-Charlotte Lorcy, Béatrice Durvy, Juliane Winkelmann, Michelle Falkenbach\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review of Luxembourg's health system analyses the country's health organization and governance, financing, health care provision, recent developments and reforms, as well as the system's performance. Luxembourg's statutory health insurance system ensures a comprehensive benefits basket for a large share of the population. Although health care accessibility is high in Luxembourg, administrative considerations, such as the requirement to possess an official address or the lack of automatic third-party payment mechanisms for several services, still constitute significant barriers for vulnerable populations to access care. Overall, Luxembourg performs well on health outcomes, although indicators on behavioural risk factors and socioeconomic disparities remain sources of concern given their adverse impact on population health. Historically, Luxembourg's health system legislation has been fragmented but the recent merger in 2023 of two ministries to compose the Ministry of Health and Social Security (known by the abbreviation M3S) sets a path towards more cohesive health care planning, legislation and financing. Nevertheless, elements of accountability and transparency in health policy-making still pose important challenges. Considering its small size, Luxembourg's health care system is highly centralized and the health infrastructure is well distributed. However, the country relies heavily on a foreign-trained health workforce, which raises concerns about the accessibility of care and may undermine the maintenance of high standards of quality of care for complex medical procedures if the retention of skilled medical professionals is not safeguarded. Hence, Luxembourg has been focusing on developing further initial education programmes for its health professionals, as well as developing a digital health care workforce registry and legal framework to encourage multiprofessional collaboration and task-shifting opportunities. Finally, despite efforts to enhance the sustainability of the health system via reforms for better cost containment, increased investments in preventive services and refinement of hospital services, overall efficiency could be improved. Luxembourg has one of the highest per capita expenditures on health compared with other countries with similar health system and population health outcomes and lacks a mechanism for priority setting in budget allocation, incentives for efficiency improvements, and an enhanced focus on prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health systems in transition\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"1-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health systems in transition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems in transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这份对卢森堡卫生系统的审查分析了该国的卫生组织和治理、融资、卫生保健提供、最近的发展和改革,以及该系统的绩效。卢森堡的法定医疗保险制度确保为大部分人口提供全面的一揽子福利。尽管卢森堡的保健可及性很高,但行政方面的考虑,例如要求拥有正式地址或某些服务缺乏第三方自动支付机制,仍然构成弱势群体获得保健的重大障碍。总体而言,卢森堡在健康成果方面表现良好,尽管关于行为风险因素和社会经济差距的指标仍然令人关切,因为它们对人口健康产生不利影响。从历史上看,卢森堡的卫生系统立法一直是支离破碎的,但最近在2023年合并了两个部门,组成了卫生和社会保障部(简称M3S),为更有凝聚力的卫生保健规划、立法和融资开辟了道路。然而,卫生决策中的问责制和透明度因素仍然构成重大挑战。考虑到国土面积小,卢森堡的卫生保健系统高度集中,卫生基础设施分布良好。然而,该国严重依赖受过外国培训的保健工作人员,这引起了人们对获得护理的担忧,如果不能保障熟练的医疗专业人员的保留,可能会破坏对复杂医疗程序的高质量护理的维持。因此,卢森堡一直致力于为其保健专业人员制定进一步的初级教育方案,并制定数字保健工作人员登记册和法律框架,以鼓励多专业协作和任务转移机会。最后,尽管通过更好地控制成本的改革、增加对预防服务的投资和改进医院服务,努力提高卫生系统的可持续性,但总体效率可以提高。与具有类似卫生系统和人口健康结果的其他国家相比,卢森堡是人均卫生支出最高的国家之一,缺乏在预算分配中确定优先事项的机制,缺乏提高效率的激励机制,缺乏对预防的加强关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Luxembourg: Health System Review.

This review of Luxembourg's health system analyses the country's health organization and governance, financing, health care provision, recent developments and reforms, as well as the system's performance. Luxembourg's statutory health insurance system ensures a comprehensive benefits basket for a large share of the population. Although health care accessibility is high in Luxembourg, administrative considerations, such as the requirement to possess an official address or the lack of automatic third-party payment mechanisms for several services, still constitute significant barriers for vulnerable populations to access care. Overall, Luxembourg performs well on health outcomes, although indicators on behavioural risk factors and socioeconomic disparities remain sources of concern given their adverse impact on population health. Historically, Luxembourg's health system legislation has been fragmented but the recent merger in 2023 of two ministries to compose the Ministry of Health and Social Security (known by the abbreviation M3S) sets a path towards more cohesive health care planning, legislation and financing. Nevertheless, elements of accountability and transparency in health policy-making still pose important challenges. Considering its small size, Luxembourg's health care system is highly centralized and the health infrastructure is well distributed. However, the country relies heavily on a foreign-trained health workforce, which raises concerns about the accessibility of care and may undermine the maintenance of high standards of quality of care for complex medical procedures if the retention of skilled medical professionals is not safeguarded. Hence, Luxembourg has been focusing on developing further initial education programmes for its health professionals, as well as developing a digital health care workforce registry and legal framework to encourage multiprofessional collaboration and task-shifting opportunities. Finally, despite efforts to enhance the sustainability of the health system via reforms for better cost containment, increased investments in preventive services and refinement of hospital services, overall efficiency could be improved. Luxembourg has one of the highest per capita expenditures on health compared with other countries with similar health system and population health outcomes and lacks a mechanism for priority setting in budget allocation, incentives for efficiency improvements, and an enhanced focus on prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health systems in transition
Health systems in transition Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信