在制定糖尿病困扰干预措施时,利用众包纳入家庭的声音。

Q3 Medicine
Diabetes Spectrum Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2337/ds24-0024
Nicole A Kahhan, Susana R Patton, Amy I Milkes, Mark A Clements, Jessica S Pierce
{"title":"在制定糖尿病困扰干预措施时,利用众包纳入家庭的声音。","authors":"Nicole A Kahhan, Susana R Patton, Amy I Milkes, Mark A Clements, Jessica S Pierce","doi":"10.2337/ds24-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes distress (DD) is the negative emotional toll of living with or caring for type 1 diabetes, encompassing the pervasiveness of its daily demands. We recently developed Remedy to Diabetes Distress (R2D2), a screen-to-treat intervention for families of school-aged children with type 1 diabetes. This article reports on the use of crowdsourcing methods to design the intervention and capture the voice of parent stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We recruited 41 parents of 8- to 12-year-olds with type 1 diabetes. In a secure online social network, we posted study questions to participants, who could respond to our questions and view and comment on other participants' responses (i.e., participants could interact as a \"crowd\"). An iterative approach allowed our questions to move from broad to specific, enabling parent input on treatment content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using a conceptual model of DD, we examined responses and applied codes to distill qualitative categories. We established substantial agreement on identified categories, with fidelity at κ = 0.615. In addition to providing broad feedback (e.g., on preferred language for common phrases used in type 1 diabetes interventions), parents also provided feedback on specific treatment components and the overall tone of the intervention. Parents highlighted benefit-finding and positive talk/self-talk as pertinent for incorporation into treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study illustrates the use of crowdsourcing methods to capture the voices of parents of school-aged children with type 1 diabetes when designing a DD intervention. The next phase of R2D2 will be a small pre-trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, followed by a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial (RCT), during which family voices will continue to be incorporated.</p>","PeriodicalId":39737,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Spectrum","volume":"38 2","pages":"180-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing Crowdsourcing to Incorporate the Voice of the Family When Developing a Diabetes Distress Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole A Kahhan, Susana R Patton, Amy I Milkes, Mark A Clements, Jessica S Pierce\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/ds24-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes distress (DD) is the negative emotional toll of living with or caring for type 1 diabetes, encompassing the pervasiveness of its daily demands. We recently developed Remedy to Diabetes Distress (R2D2), a screen-to-treat intervention for families of school-aged children with type 1 diabetes. This article reports on the use of crowdsourcing methods to design the intervention and capture the voice of parent stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We recruited 41 parents of 8- to 12-year-olds with type 1 diabetes. In a secure online social network, we posted study questions to participants, who could respond to our questions and view and comment on other participants' responses (i.e., participants could interact as a \\\"crowd\\\"). An iterative approach allowed our questions to move from broad to specific, enabling parent input on treatment content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using a conceptual model of DD, we examined responses and applied codes to distill qualitative categories. We established substantial agreement on identified categories, with fidelity at κ = 0.615. In addition to providing broad feedback (e.g., on preferred language for common phrases used in type 1 diabetes interventions), parents also provided feedback on specific treatment components and the overall tone of the intervention. Parents highlighted benefit-finding and positive talk/self-talk as pertinent for incorporation into treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study illustrates the use of crowdsourcing methods to capture the voices of parents of school-aged children with type 1 diabetes when designing a DD intervention. The next phase of R2D2 will be a small pre-trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, followed by a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial (RCT), during which family voices will continue to be incorporated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Spectrum\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"180-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078989/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds24-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds24-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:糖尿病痛苦(DD)是1型糖尿病患者生活或护理的负面情绪代价,包括其日常需求的普遍性。我们最近开发了治疗糖尿病窘迫(R2D2),这是一种针对1型糖尿病学龄儿童家庭的筛查治疗干预。本文报告了使用众包方法来设计干预和捕捉家长利益相关者的声音。研究设计和方法:我们招募了41位8- 12岁1型糖尿病患者的父母。在一个安全的在线社交网络中,我们向参与者发布研究问题,他们可以回答我们的问题,并查看和评论其他参与者的回答(即,参与者可以作为“人群”进行互动)。一种迭代的方法使我们的问题从广泛转向具体,使家长能够对治疗内容进行输入。结果:使用DD的概念模型,我们检查了响应并应用代码提取定性类别。我们在识别的类别上建立了实质性的一致,其保真度为κ = 0.615。除了提供广泛的反馈(例如,在1型糖尿病干预中使用的常用短语的首选语言),家长还对具体的治疗成分和干预的总体基调提供了反馈。家长们强调了寻找益处和积极的谈话/自我交谈是与治疗相结合的。结论:本研究说明了在设计1型糖尿病学龄儿童的干预措施时,使用众包方法来捕捉父母的声音。R2D2的下一阶段将是一个小型的预试验,以评估干预的可行性和可接受性,然后是一个概念验证随机对照试验(RCT),在此期间,家庭的声音将继续被纳入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing Crowdsourcing to Incorporate the Voice of the Family When Developing a Diabetes Distress Intervention.

Objective: Diabetes distress (DD) is the negative emotional toll of living with or caring for type 1 diabetes, encompassing the pervasiveness of its daily demands. We recently developed Remedy to Diabetes Distress (R2D2), a screen-to-treat intervention for families of school-aged children with type 1 diabetes. This article reports on the use of crowdsourcing methods to design the intervention and capture the voice of parent stakeholders.

Research design and methods: We recruited 41 parents of 8- to 12-year-olds with type 1 diabetes. In a secure online social network, we posted study questions to participants, who could respond to our questions and view and comment on other participants' responses (i.e., participants could interact as a "crowd"). An iterative approach allowed our questions to move from broad to specific, enabling parent input on treatment content.

Results: Using a conceptual model of DD, we examined responses and applied codes to distill qualitative categories. We established substantial agreement on identified categories, with fidelity at κ = 0.615. In addition to providing broad feedback (e.g., on preferred language for common phrases used in type 1 diabetes interventions), parents also provided feedback on specific treatment components and the overall tone of the intervention. Parents highlighted benefit-finding and positive talk/self-talk as pertinent for incorporation into treatment.

Conclusion: This study illustrates the use of crowdsourcing methods to capture the voices of parents of school-aged children with type 1 diabetes when designing a DD intervention. The next phase of R2D2 will be a small pre-trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, followed by a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial (RCT), during which family voices will continue to be incorporated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Spectrum
Diabetes Spectrum Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The mission of Diabetes Spectrum: From Research to Practice is to assist health care professionals in the development of strategies to individualize treatment and diabetes self-management education for improved quality of life and diabetes control. These goals are achieved by presenting review as well as original, peer-reviewed articles on topics in clinical diabetes management, professional and patient education, nutrition, behavioral science and counseling, educational program development, and advocacy. In each issue, the FROM RESEARCH TO PRACTICE section explores, in depth, a diabetes care topic and provides practical application of current research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信