VISITECT®CD4晚期疾病检测在常规使用:诊断准确性和可用性,埃塞俄比亚和印度尼西亚。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tropical Medicine & International Health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1111/tmi.14124
Petra de Haas, Pamela Hepple, Yohannes Babo, Francisca Srioetami, Misikir Amare, Bihil Sherefdin, Andrii Slyzkyi, Denisa Widyaputri, Erni Juwita Nelwan, Jhon Sugiharto, Ahmed Bedru, Edine Tiemersma
{"title":"VISITECT®CD4晚期疾病检测在常规使用:诊断准确性和可用性,埃塞俄比亚和印度尼西亚。","authors":"Petra de Haas, Pamela Hepple, Yohannes Babo, Francisca Srioetami, Misikir Amare, Bihil Sherefdin, Andrii Slyzkyi, Denisa Widyaputri, Erni Juwita Nelwan, Jhon Sugiharto, Ahmed Bedru, Edine Tiemersma","doi":"10.1111/tmi.14124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and usability of the rapid semiquantitative point of care VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay, compared to routinely obtained CD4 counts among people living with HIV in Ethiopia and Indonesia. We consecutively enrolled people living with HIV aged ≥10 years who were newly diagnosed, had interrupted antiretroviral treatment for ≥3 months, or were feeling unwell. Venous blood was drawn to obtain CD4 counts on routinely available test instruments and a VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay result. The sensitivity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was high (97.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.4-99.4%), but the specificity was low (32.7%, 95%CI, 27.9-37.8%). It significantly increased to 42.5% (95%CI, 33.2-52.1%) after retraining of laboratory staff, but remained low. The low specificity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was due to poor capacity in test reading by routine staff. Reading the test strip is error-prone and requires intensive and regular training. Reading aids may improve the usability of this essential point of care test.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":"685-693"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VISITECT® CD4 advanced disease assay in routine use: Diagnostic accuracy and usability, Ethiopia and Indonesia.\",\"authors\":\"Petra de Haas, Pamela Hepple, Yohannes Babo, Francisca Srioetami, Misikir Amare, Bihil Sherefdin, Andrii Slyzkyi, Denisa Widyaputri, Erni Juwita Nelwan, Jhon Sugiharto, Ahmed Bedru, Edine Tiemersma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tmi.14124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and usability of the rapid semiquantitative point of care VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay, compared to routinely obtained CD4 counts among people living with HIV in Ethiopia and Indonesia. We consecutively enrolled people living with HIV aged ≥10 years who were newly diagnosed, had interrupted antiretroviral treatment for ≥3 months, or were feeling unwell. Venous blood was drawn to obtain CD4 counts on routinely available test instruments and a VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay result. The sensitivity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was high (97.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.4-99.4%), but the specificity was low (32.7%, 95%CI, 27.9-37.8%). It significantly increased to 42.5% (95%CI, 33.2-52.1%) after retraining of laboratory staff, but remained low. The low specificity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was due to poor capacity in test reading by routine staff. Reading the test strip is error-prone and requires intensive and regular training. Reading aids may improve the usability of this essential point of care test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Medicine & International Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"685-693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Medicine & International Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.14124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.14124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了快速半定量护理点VISITECT®CD4晚期疾病检测的诊断准确性和可用性,并与埃塞俄比亚和印度尼西亚艾滋病毒感染者常规获得的CD4计数进行了比较。我们连续招募年龄≥10岁、新诊断、中断抗逆转录病毒治疗≥3个月或感觉不适的HIV感染者。抽取静脉血,在常规可用的测试仪器上获得CD4计数和VISITECT®CD4晚期疾病检测结果。VISITECT®CD4晚期疾病检测灵敏度高(97.8%,95%可信区间[CI], 94.4-99.4%),但特异性较低(32.7%,95%CI, 27.9-37.8%)。实验室人员再培训后,这一比例显著上升至42.5% (95%CI, 33.2-52.1%),但仍保持在较低水平。VISITECT®CD4晚期疾病检测的低特异性是由于常规工作人员的读数能力差。阅读考卷很容易出错,需要密集和定期的训练。阅读辅助工具可以提高这一重要的关注点测试的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
VISITECT® CD4 advanced disease assay in routine use: Diagnostic accuracy and usability, Ethiopia and Indonesia.

We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and usability of the rapid semiquantitative point of care VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay, compared to routinely obtained CD4 counts among people living with HIV in Ethiopia and Indonesia. We consecutively enrolled people living with HIV aged ≥10 years who were newly diagnosed, had interrupted antiretroviral treatment for ≥3 months, or were feeling unwell. Venous blood was drawn to obtain CD4 counts on routinely available test instruments and a VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay result. The sensitivity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was high (97.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.4-99.4%), but the specificity was low (32.7%, 95%CI, 27.9-37.8%). It significantly increased to 42.5% (95%CI, 33.2-52.1%) after retraining of laboratory staff, but remained low. The low specificity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was due to poor capacity in test reading by routine staff. Reading the test strip is error-prone and requires intensive and regular training. Reading aids may improve the usability of this essential point of care test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信