Abdulaziz S Alshabibi, Sultan F Alhujaili, Basel Qenam, Areej Aloufi, Salman M Albeshan, Meaad M Almusined, Abdulmajeed Alotabibi, Nuha A Khoumais
{"title":"放射科医生也是人:解决职业疲劳、旅行历史和饥饿对乳房x光检查阅读性能的影响。","authors":"Abdulaziz S Alshabibi, Sultan F Alhujaili, Basel Qenam, Areej Aloufi, Salman M Albeshan, Meaad M Almusined, Abdulmajeed Alotabibi, Nuha A Khoumais","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To investigate how occupational exhaustion, travel, and hunger affect mammography reading performance among radiologists and radiology trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty participants (22 radiologists, eight radiology trainees) completed mammography reading assessments using the DetectedX platform during two radiology conferences in Saudi Arabia. Each participant interpreted 30 de-identified mammographic cases (15 abnormal, 15 normal) under standardized conditions. Performance was measured using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC), lesion sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Three independent variables were self-reported using a questionnaire completed immediately before the mammography reading session: occupational exhaustion (low to moderate or high, assessed by the Emotional Exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey), recent travel (traveler or non-traveler), and hunger status (hungry or not hungry). Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine differences in reading performance associated with each variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with high occupational exhaustion had significantly lower JAFROC scores compared to those with low to moderate exhaustion (0.213 vs 0.383; p=0.041). Recently traveled participants had significantly lower ROC AUC scores (0.681 vs. 0.772; p=0.03) and lower sensitivity (70.0% vs. 80.0%; p=0.04) than non-travelers. Hungry participants exhibited higher sensitivity (85.0% vs. 70.0%; p=0.04) but lower specificity (40.0% vs. 65.0%; p=0.02) compared to non-hungry participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occupational exhaustion was associated with poorer JAFROC scores, recent travel lowered sensitivity and overall diagnostic accuracy, and hunger increased sensitivity at the cost of specificity. These findings highlight the importance of addressing radiologists' well-being by optimizing workloads, allowing recovery periods after travel, and ensuring structured meal schedules. Future research should explore real-world clinical settings and targeted interventions, including AI integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiologists are Human Too: Addressing the Impacts of Occupational Exhaustion, Travel History, and Hunger on Mammography Reading Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulaziz S Alshabibi, Sultan F Alhujaili, Basel Qenam, Areej Aloufi, Salman M Albeshan, Meaad M Almusined, Abdulmajeed Alotabibi, Nuha A Khoumais\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To investigate how occupational exhaustion, travel, and hunger affect mammography reading performance among radiologists and radiology trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty participants (22 radiologists, eight radiology trainees) completed mammography reading assessments using the DetectedX platform during two radiology conferences in Saudi Arabia. Each participant interpreted 30 de-identified mammographic cases (15 abnormal, 15 normal) under standardized conditions. Performance was measured using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC), lesion sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Three independent variables were self-reported using a questionnaire completed immediately before the mammography reading session: occupational exhaustion (low to moderate or high, assessed by the Emotional Exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey), recent travel (traveler or non-traveler), and hunger status (hungry or not hungry). Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine differences in reading performance associated with each variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with high occupational exhaustion had significantly lower JAFROC scores compared to those with low to moderate exhaustion (0.213 vs 0.383; p=0.041). Recently traveled participants had significantly lower ROC AUC scores (0.681 vs. 0.772; p=0.03) and lower sensitivity (70.0% vs. 80.0%; p=0.04) than non-travelers. Hungry participants exhibited higher sensitivity (85.0% vs. 70.0%; p=0.04) but lower specificity (40.0% vs. 65.0%; p=0.02) compared to non-hungry participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occupational exhaustion was associated with poorer JAFROC scores, recent travel lowered sensitivity and overall diagnostic accuracy, and hunger increased sensitivity at the cost of specificity. These findings highlight the importance of addressing radiologists' well-being by optimizing workloads, allowing recovery periods after travel, and ensuring structured meal schedules. Future research should explore real-world clinical settings and targeted interventions, including AI integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.067\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
理由和目的:调查职业疲劳、旅行和饥饿如何影响放射科医生和放射科实习生的乳房x光检查阅读表现。方法:在沙特阿拉伯举行的两次放射学会议期间,30名参与者(22名放射科医生,8名放射学培训生)使用DetectedX平台完成了乳房x光检查阅读评估。每位参与者在标准化条件下解释了30例去识别的乳房x光检查病例(15例异常,15例正常)。采用折刀可选自由反应受者工作特征(JAFROC)、病变敏感性、受者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC AUC)、敏感性和特异性来衡量疗效。三个自变量是在乳房x光检查阅读之前立即完成的问卷中自我报告的:职业疲劳(低到中等或高,由马斯拉奇倦怠量表的情绪疲劳子量表评估),最近的旅行(旅行者或非旅行者)和饥饿状态(饥饿或不饥饿)。使用Mann-Whitney U测试来检查与每个变量相关的阅读表现差异。结果:高度职业倦怠的参与者的JAFROC得分显著低于低至中度职业倦怠的参与者(0.213 vs 0.383;p = 0.041)。最近旅行的参与者的ROC AUC得分显著降低(0.681比0.772;P =0.03)和较低的敏感性(70.0% vs. 80.0%;P =0.04)。饥饿的参与者表现出更高的敏感性(85.0% vs. 70.0%;P =0.04),但特异性较低(40.0% vs. 65.0%;P =0.02)。结论:职业疲劳与较差的JAFROC评分有关,最近的旅行降低了敏感性和总体诊断准确性,饥饿以牺牲特异性为代价增加了敏感性。这些发现强调了通过优化工作量、允许旅行后的恢复期和确保有组织的用餐时间表来解决放射科医生健康问题的重要性。未来的研究应该探索现实世界的临床环境和有针对性的干预措施,包括人工智能的整合。
Radiologists are Human Too: Addressing the Impacts of Occupational Exhaustion, Travel History, and Hunger on Mammography Reading Performance.
Rationale and objectives: To investigate how occupational exhaustion, travel, and hunger affect mammography reading performance among radiologists and radiology trainees.
Methods: Thirty participants (22 radiologists, eight radiology trainees) completed mammography reading assessments using the DetectedX platform during two radiology conferences in Saudi Arabia. Each participant interpreted 30 de-identified mammographic cases (15 abnormal, 15 normal) under standardized conditions. Performance was measured using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC), lesion sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Three independent variables were self-reported using a questionnaire completed immediately before the mammography reading session: occupational exhaustion (low to moderate or high, assessed by the Emotional Exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey), recent travel (traveler or non-traveler), and hunger status (hungry or not hungry). Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine differences in reading performance associated with each variable.
Results: Participants with high occupational exhaustion had significantly lower JAFROC scores compared to those with low to moderate exhaustion (0.213 vs 0.383; p=0.041). Recently traveled participants had significantly lower ROC AUC scores (0.681 vs. 0.772; p=0.03) and lower sensitivity (70.0% vs. 80.0%; p=0.04) than non-travelers. Hungry participants exhibited higher sensitivity (85.0% vs. 70.0%; p=0.04) but lower specificity (40.0% vs. 65.0%; p=0.02) compared to non-hungry participants.
Conclusion: Occupational exhaustion was associated with poorer JAFROC scores, recent travel lowered sensitivity and overall diagnostic accuracy, and hunger increased sensitivity at the cost of specificity. These findings highlight the importance of addressing radiologists' well-being by optimizing workloads, allowing recovery periods after travel, and ensuring structured meal schedules. Future research should explore real-world clinical settings and targeted interventions, including AI integration.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.