{"title":"俯卧位在COVID-19患者自主呼吸中的应用","authors":"Rodrigo Cerqueira Borges, Isadora Salvador Rocco, Camila Botana Alves Ferreira, Mauricio Kenzo Tobara, Cristiane Helena Papacidero, Vanessa Chaves Barreto Ferreira, Andrey Wirgues Sousa","doi":"10.2478/jccm-2025-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate if awake prone position (PP) reduces the rate of endotracheal intubation and mortality in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of 726 patients who were admitted to the ICU with acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. The protocol of the institution recommended the use of awake PP in patients with nasal catheter with an oxygen flow ≥ 5 L/min and SpO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 90% or a high-flow nasal catheter (HFNC) with FiO<sub>2</sub> ≥ 50% and SpO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 90%. The following data were collected: age, comorbidities, SAPS-3 score, onset of symptoms, the degree of pulmonary involvement, duration of invasive and noninvasive MV, HFNC therapy, nitric oxide therapy, hemodialysis and PP while spontaneously breathing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a higher mortality rate in the supine position group (27.1%) than in the awake PP group (13.9%). There was no significant difference in the time on MV or number of patients on MV (p>0.05). The variables with p < 0.05 in the bivariate analysis were entered into the Cox regression model. The model was adjusted for awake PP, sex, age, SAPS-3 score, onset of symptoms, the degree of pulmonary involvement, chronic arterial disease, and noninvasive ventilation. The only variable associated with lower mortality over time was awake PP (hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Awake prone position has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy that reduced mortality but not the risk of intubation in patients with COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":"149-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of prone position in spontaneous breathing in patients with COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Cerqueira Borges, Isadora Salvador Rocco, Camila Botana Alves Ferreira, Mauricio Kenzo Tobara, Cristiane Helena Papacidero, Vanessa Chaves Barreto Ferreira, Andrey Wirgues Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jccm-2025-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate if awake prone position (PP) reduces the rate of endotracheal intubation and mortality in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of 726 patients who were admitted to the ICU with acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. The protocol of the institution recommended the use of awake PP in patients with nasal catheter with an oxygen flow ≥ 5 L/min and SpO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 90% or a high-flow nasal catheter (HFNC) with FiO<sub>2</sub> ≥ 50% and SpO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 90%. The following data were collected: age, comorbidities, SAPS-3 score, onset of symptoms, the degree of pulmonary involvement, duration of invasive and noninvasive MV, HFNC therapy, nitric oxide therapy, hemodialysis and PP while spontaneously breathing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a higher mortality rate in the supine position group (27.1%) than in the awake PP group (13.9%). There was no significant difference in the time on MV or number of patients on MV (p>0.05). The variables with p < 0.05 in the bivariate analysis were entered into the Cox regression model. The model was adjusted for awake PP, sex, age, SAPS-3 score, onset of symptoms, the degree of pulmonary involvement, chronic arterial disease, and noninvasive ventilation. The only variable associated with lower mortality over time was awake PP (hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Awake prone position has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy that reduced mortality but not the risk of intubation in patients with COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"149-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080528/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of prone position in spontaneous breathing in patients with COVID-19.
Objective: To investigate if awake prone position (PP) reduces the rate of endotracheal intubation and mortality in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 726 patients who were admitted to the ICU with acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. The protocol of the institution recommended the use of awake PP in patients with nasal catheter with an oxygen flow ≥ 5 L/min and SpO2 ≤ 90% or a high-flow nasal catheter (HFNC) with FiO2 ≥ 50% and SpO2 ≤ 90%. The following data were collected: age, comorbidities, SAPS-3 score, onset of symptoms, the degree of pulmonary involvement, duration of invasive and noninvasive MV, HFNC therapy, nitric oxide therapy, hemodialysis and PP while spontaneously breathing.
Results: There was a higher mortality rate in the supine position group (27.1%) than in the awake PP group (13.9%). There was no significant difference in the time on MV or number of patients on MV (p>0.05). The variables with p < 0.05 in the bivariate analysis were entered into the Cox regression model. The model was adjusted for awake PP, sex, age, SAPS-3 score, onset of symptoms, the degree of pulmonary involvement, chronic arterial disease, and noninvasive ventilation. The only variable associated with lower mortality over time was awake PP (hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.92).
Conclusion: Awake prone position has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy that reduced mortality but not the risk of intubation in patients with COVID-19.