患者报告的结果测量评分与医疗费用和住院之间的关系:来自犹他州mEVAL和价值驱动结果的结果。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rachel Kroencke, Zoe Gombart, Yue Zhang, Haojia Li, Rachel Hess
{"title":"患者报告的结果测量评分与医疗费用和住院之间的关系:来自犹他州mEVAL和价值驱动结果的结果。","authors":"Rachel Kroencke, Zoe Gombart, Yue Zhang, Haojia Li, Rachel Hess","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00889-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) profile patient health status, have been found to be helpful in identifying high health care utilizers, and may be useful in providing targeted interventions to decrease health care costs. In 2013 the University of Utah Health (UU Health) began collecting mental and physical health PROMs using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments through a tool called My Evaluation (mEVAL). In 2012 UU Health began cataloguing inpatient and outpatient healthcare-associated costs. The objective of this study was to identify association of poor PROMIS physical function and depression scores with (1) likelihood of inpatient hospitalization and (2) overall inpatient healthcare costs.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study was a retrospective observational cohort study including patients seen at UU Health between 1/2013 and 12/2017 who completed PROMIS instruments at an outpatient visit using the mEVAL platform. PROMIS instruments were completed prior to outpatient visits. The primary outcome was time to incident hospitalization modeled by using the Cox proportional hazards approach. For cost analysis, raw inpatient healthcare costs were fitted using a median regression model. Both results were adjusted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 92,383 people, the average age was 48 (SD 18.6); 57% were female; and 87% identified as non-Hispanic white. A total of 11,909 patients who completed one or both of the mEVAL PROMIS instruments were admitted. The average PROMIS physical function and depression scores were 44.9 and 51.1, respectively. Those with worse physical function scores and worse depression scores were more likely to be hospitalized [HR = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.678, 1.872); HR (95% CI) = 1.149 (1.059, 1.246), respectively]. A physical function score 1.5 SD below the mean was associated with an increased median hospitalization cost of $2496; there was no statistically significant association between depression score 1.5 SD above mean and hospitalization costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poor physical function scores were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and higher inpatient health costs, while poor depression scores were only associated with increased risk of hospitalization. Future work should examine if improvement in these PROMs alters these metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship among patient reported outcome measure scores with health care costs and inpatient admission: results from Utah mEVAL and value driven outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Kroencke, Zoe Gombart, Yue Zhang, Haojia Li, Rachel Hess\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41687-025-00889-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) profile patient health status, have been found to be helpful in identifying high health care utilizers, and may be useful in providing targeted interventions to decrease health care costs. In 2013 the University of Utah Health (UU Health) began collecting mental and physical health PROMs using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments through a tool called My Evaluation (mEVAL). In 2012 UU Health began cataloguing inpatient and outpatient healthcare-associated costs. The objective of this study was to identify association of poor PROMIS physical function and depression scores with (1) likelihood of inpatient hospitalization and (2) overall inpatient healthcare costs.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study was a retrospective observational cohort study including patients seen at UU Health between 1/2013 and 12/2017 who completed PROMIS instruments at an outpatient visit using the mEVAL platform. PROMIS instruments were completed prior to outpatient visits. The primary outcome was time to incident hospitalization modeled by using the Cox proportional hazards approach. For cost analysis, raw inpatient healthcare costs were fitted using a median regression model. Both results were adjusted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 92,383 people, the average age was 48 (SD 18.6); 57% were female; and 87% identified as non-Hispanic white. A total of 11,909 patients who completed one or both of the mEVAL PROMIS instruments were admitted. The average PROMIS physical function and depression scores were 44.9 and 51.1, respectively. Those with worse physical function scores and worse depression scores were more likely to be hospitalized [HR = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.678, 1.872); HR (95% CI) = 1.149 (1.059, 1.246), respectively]. A physical function score 1.5 SD below the mean was associated with an increased median hospitalization cost of $2496; there was no statistically significant association between depression score 1.5 SD above mean and hospitalization costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poor physical function scores were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and higher inpatient health costs, while poor depression scores were only associated with increased risk of hospitalization. Future work should examine if improvement in these PROMs alters these metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00889-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00889-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)描述了患者的健康状况,已被发现有助于识别高医疗保健利用率,并可能有助于提供有针对性的干预措施以降低医疗保健成本。2013年,犹他大学健康(UU Health)开始使用患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)仪器,通过一种名为“我的评估”(mEVAL)的工具收集心理和身体健康方面的prom。2012年,UU Health开始对住院和门诊医疗相关费用进行分类。本研究的目的是确定不良PROMIS身体功能和抑郁评分与(1)住院可能性和(2)住院总医疗费用之间的关联。方法:本研究是一项回顾性观察性队列研究,纳入了2013年1月至2017年12月期间在UU Health就诊的患者,这些患者在门诊就诊时使用mEVAL平台完成了PROMIS仪器。PROMIS仪器在门诊就诊前完成。主要终点是使用Cox比例风险法建模的事件住院时间。对于成本分析,使用中位数回归模型拟合原始住院医疗保健成本。两个结果都进行了调整。结果:92383例患者中,平均年龄48岁(SD 18.6);57%为女性;87%为非西班牙裔白人。总共有11909名患者完成了一种或两种mEVAL PROMIS器械。PROMIS身体功能和抑郁的平均得分分别为44.9分和51.1分。身体功能评分和抑郁评分较差的患者更容易住院[HR = 1.77, 95%可信区间(CI) (1.678, 1.872);HR (95% CI) = 1.149(1.059, 1.246)。身体功能评分低于平均值1.5 SD与住院费用中位数增加2496美元相关;抑郁评分高于平均值1.5 SD与住院费用无统计学意义。结论:较差的身体功能评分与住院风险增加和住院医疗费用增加有关,而较差的抑郁评分仅与住院风险增加有关。未来的工作应该检查这些prom的改进是否会改变这些度量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship among patient reported outcome measure scores with health care costs and inpatient admission: results from Utah mEVAL and value driven outcomes.

Background: Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) profile patient health status, have been found to be helpful in identifying high health care utilizers, and may be useful in providing targeted interventions to decrease health care costs. In 2013 the University of Utah Health (UU Health) began collecting mental and physical health PROMs using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments through a tool called My Evaluation (mEVAL). In 2012 UU Health began cataloguing inpatient and outpatient healthcare-associated costs. The objective of this study was to identify association of poor PROMIS physical function and depression scores with (1) likelihood of inpatient hospitalization and (2) overall inpatient healthcare costs.

Methodology: This study was a retrospective observational cohort study including patients seen at UU Health between 1/2013 and 12/2017 who completed PROMIS instruments at an outpatient visit using the mEVAL platform. PROMIS instruments were completed prior to outpatient visits. The primary outcome was time to incident hospitalization modeled by using the Cox proportional hazards approach. For cost analysis, raw inpatient healthcare costs were fitted using a median regression model. Both results were adjusted.

Results: Of 92,383 people, the average age was 48 (SD 18.6); 57% were female; and 87% identified as non-Hispanic white. A total of 11,909 patients who completed one or both of the mEVAL PROMIS instruments were admitted. The average PROMIS physical function and depression scores were 44.9 and 51.1, respectively. Those with worse physical function scores and worse depression scores were more likely to be hospitalized [HR = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.678, 1.872); HR (95% CI) = 1.149 (1.059, 1.246), respectively]. A physical function score 1.5 SD below the mean was associated with an increased median hospitalization cost of $2496; there was no statistically significant association between depression score 1.5 SD above mean and hospitalization costs.

Conclusions: Poor physical function scores were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and higher inpatient health costs, while poor depression scores were only associated with increased risk of hospitalization. Future work should examine if improvement in these PROMs alters these metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信