全关节置换术患者的麻醉护理:区域麻醉差异的述评及对未来研究方向的建议。

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Current Anesthesiology Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1007/s40140-024-00676-3
Juan Pablo Forero, Eric C Sun, Edward R Mariano, Anjali A Dixit
{"title":"全关节置换术患者的麻醉护理:区域麻醉差异的述评及对未来研究方向的建议。","authors":"Juan Pablo Forero, Eric C Sun, Edward R Mariano, Anjali A Dixit","doi":"10.1007/s40140-024-00676-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>High-quality evidence substantiates the use of regional anesthesia for elective total joint arthroplasty. The use of regional anesthesia in this surgical population, therefore, can also be used to evaluate health care disparities and measure health equity. This narrative review assesses and summarizes available literature on disparities in the use of regional anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty and identifies factors contributing to those disparities.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We found that disparities exist in the use of regional anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty and are multifactorial in origin, encompassing patient characteristics such as race and ethnicity and systemic factors such as hospital type and insurance status. However, there is an overall paucity of literature focused specifically on drivers of disparities, and no evidence supporting interventions that may alleviate known disparities.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Disparities in use of regional anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty are multifactorial in origin and encompass differences in care at the levels of race, ethnicity, hospital, and insurance status, among others. Additional work is needed at the epidemiologic level to understand what factors underlie known disparities in anesthesia care and how best to promote health equity for surgical patients undergoing this set of procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":36608,"journal":{"name":"Current Anesthesiology Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthesia Care for Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Disparities in Regional Anesthesia and Recommendations for Future Research Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Pablo Forero, Eric C Sun, Edward R Mariano, Anjali A Dixit\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40140-024-00676-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>High-quality evidence substantiates the use of regional anesthesia for elective total joint arthroplasty. The use of regional anesthesia in this surgical population, therefore, can also be used to evaluate health care disparities and measure health equity. This narrative review assesses and summarizes available literature on disparities in the use of regional anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty and identifies factors contributing to those disparities.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We found that disparities exist in the use of regional anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty and are multifactorial in origin, encompassing patient characteristics such as race and ethnicity and systemic factors such as hospital type and insurance status. However, there is an overall paucity of literature focused specifically on drivers of disparities, and no evidence supporting interventions that may alleviate known disparities.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Disparities in use of regional anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty are multifactorial in origin and encompass differences in care at the levels of race, ethnicity, hospital, and insurance status, among others. Additional work is needed at the epidemiologic level to understand what factors underlie known disparities in anesthesia care and how best to promote health equity for surgical patients undergoing this set of procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Anesthesiology Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083783/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Anesthesiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-024-00676-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Anesthesiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-024-00676-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾的目的:高质量的证据证实了区域麻醉在选择性全关节置换术中的应用。因此,在该手术人群中使用区域麻醉也可用于评估卫生保健差异和衡量卫生公平性。这篇叙述性综述评估和总结了在全关节置换术中使用区域麻醉的差异,并确定了导致这些差异的因素。最近的研究发现:我们发现在全关节置换术中使用区域麻醉存在差异,并且是多因素的,包括患者的特征,如种族和民族,以及系统因素,如医院类型和保险状况。然而,总体上缺乏专门关注差异驱动因素的文献,也没有证据支持可能减轻已知差异的干预措施。总结:全关节置换术中使用区域麻醉的差异是多因素的,包括种族、民族、医院和保险状况等方面的护理差异。需要在流行病学水平上进行更多的工作,以了解麻醉护理中已知差异的因素,以及如何最好地促进接受这组手术的手术患者的健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anesthesia Care for Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Disparities in Regional Anesthesia and Recommendations for Future Research Directions.

Purpose of review: High-quality evidence substantiates the use of regional anesthesia for elective total joint arthroplasty. The use of regional anesthesia in this surgical population, therefore, can also be used to evaluate health care disparities and measure health equity. This narrative review assesses and summarizes available literature on disparities in the use of regional anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty and identifies factors contributing to those disparities.

Recent findings: We found that disparities exist in the use of regional anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty and are multifactorial in origin, encompassing patient characteristics such as race and ethnicity and systemic factors such as hospital type and insurance status. However, there is an overall paucity of literature focused specifically on drivers of disparities, and no evidence supporting interventions that may alleviate known disparities.

Summary: Disparities in use of regional anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty are multifactorial in origin and encompass differences in care at the levels of race, ethnicity, hospital, and insurance status, among others. Additional work is needed at the epidemiologic level to understand what factors underlie known disparities in anesthesia care and how best to promote health equity for surgical patients undergoing this set of procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Anesthesiology Reports
Current Anesthesiology Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: This journal aims to offer expert review articles on the most significant recent developments in the field of anesthesiology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions, the journal intends to serve those involved in the delivery of anesthesia for surgical and medical procedures, treatment of acute and chronic pain conditions, perioperative management for operative and intensive care unit patients, and associated basic science and clinical research efforts in their areas. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas across the field. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An Editorial Board of more than 20 internationally diverse members reviews the annual table of contents, ensures that topics include emerging research, and suggests topics of special importance to their country/region. Topics covered may include ambulatory anesthesia; anesthesia and inflammation; anesthetic mechanisms; anesthetic pharmacology; cardiovascular anesthesia; critical care anesthesia; local anesthetic pharmacology; monitoring technology; neuroanesthesia; neuromuscular blockade; obstetrical anesthesia; pain mechanisms; pain therapy; patient safety; pediatric anesthesia; quality assessment; regional anesthesia; and transplantation anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信