{"title":"引导人工智能伦理:在人工智能实践和技术的竞争中,ANN和ANFIS用于透明和负责任的项目评估。","authors":"Sandeep Wankhade, Manoj Sahni, Ernesto León-Castro, Maricruz Olazabal-Lugo","doi":"10.3389/frai.2025.1535845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) necessitates robust ethical frameworks to ensure responsible project deployment. This study addresses the challenge of quantifying ethical criteria in AI projects amidst contesting communicative practices, organizational structures, and enabling technologies, which shape AI's societal implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose a novel framework integrating Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) to evaluate AI project performance and model ethical uncertainties using Fuzzy logic. A Fuzzy weighted average approach quantifies critical ethical dimensions: transparency, fairness, accountability, privacy, security, explainability, human involvement, and societal impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework enables a structured assessment of AI projects, enhancing transparency and accountability by mapping ethical criteria to project outcomes. ANN evaluates performance metrics, while ANFIS models uncertainties, providing a comprehensive ethical evaluation under complex conditions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>By combining ANN and ANFIS, this study advances the understanding of AI's ethical dimensions, offering a scalable approach for accountable AI systems. It reframes organizational communication and decision-making, embedding ethics within AI's technological and structural contexts. This work contributes to responsible AI innovation, fostering trust and societal alignment in AI deployments.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"1535845"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating AI ethics: ANN and ANFIS for transparent and accountable project evaluation amidst contesting AI practices and technologies.\",\"authors\":\"Sandeep Wankhade, Manoj Sahni, Ernesto León-Castro, Maricruz Olazabal-Lugo\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frai.2025.1535845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) necessitates robust ethical frameworks to ensure responsible project deployment. This study addresses the challenge of quantifying ethical criteria in AI projects amidst contesting communicative practices, organizational structures, and enabling technologies, which shape AI's societal implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose a novel framework integrating Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) to evaluate AI project performance and model ethical uncertainties using Fuzzy logic. A Fuzzy weighted average approach quantifies critical ethical dimensions: transparency, fairness, accountability, privacy, security, explainability, human involvement, and societal impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework enables a structured assessment of AI projects, enhancing transparency and accountability by mapping ethical criteria to project outcomes. ANN evaluates performance metrics, while ANFIS models uncertainties, providing a comprehensive ethical evaluation under complex conditions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>By combining ANN and ANFIS, this study advances the understanding of AI's ethical dimensions, offering a scalable approach for accountable AI systems. It reframes organizational communication and decision-making, embedding ethics within AI's technological and structural contexts. This work contributes to responsible AI innovation, fostering trust and societal alignment in AI deployments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"1535845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083503/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1535845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1535845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating AI ethics: ANN and ANFIS for transparent and accountable project evaluation amidst contesting AI practices and technologies.
Introduction: The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) necessitates robust ethical frameworks to ensure responsible project deployment. This study addresses the challenge of quantifying ethical criteria in AI projects amidst contesting communicative practices, organizational structures, and enabling technologies, which shape AI's societal implications.
Methods: We propose a novel framework integrating Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) to evaluate AI project performance and model ethical uncertainties using Fuzzy logic. A Fuzzy weighted average approach quantifies critical ethical dimensions: transparency, fairness, accountability, privacy, security, explainability, human involvement, and societal impact.
Results: The framework enables a structured assessment of AI projects, enhancing transparency and accountability by mapping ethical criteria to project outcomes. ANN evaluates performance metrics, while ANFIS models uncertainties, providing a comprehensive ethical evaluation under complex conditions.
Discussion: By combining ANN and ANFIS, this study advances the understanding of AI's ethical dimensions, offering a scalable approach for accountable AI systems. It reframes organizational communication and decision-making, embedding ethics within AI's technological and structural contexts. This work contributes to responsible AI innovation, fostering trust and societal alignment in AI deployments.