Sonia Luka, Adela Golea, Raluca Mihaela Tat, Eugenia Maria Lupan Mureșan, George Teo Voicescu, Ștefan Cristian Vesa, Maria Adriana Albu, Daniela Ionescu
{"title":"生物标志物检测在急诊科的应用。","authors":"Sonia Luka, Adela Golea, Raluca Mihaela Tat, Eugenia Maria Lupan Mureșan, George Teo Voicescu, Ștefan Cristian Vesa, Maria Adriana Albu, Daniela Ionescu","doi":"10.2478/jccm-2024-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the fast-paced environment of Emergency Departments (EDs), biomarkers are essential for the rapid diagnosis and management of critical conditions.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This study evaluates the current clinical practice on key biomarkers in Romanian EDs, addressing the needs of emergency medicine physicians, and the challenges associated with biomarker testing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to physicians working in ED to explore their perceptions, needs, and barriers regarding biomarkers, including Point-of-care (POC). Data was collected anonymously through an online platform and subsequently analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This survey analyzed data from 168 completed responses, with 95.2% of respondents being specialists in emergency medicine. Procalcitonin and presepsin were most preferred for PoCT, while troponin and D-dimer were highly rated regardless of the testing method, reflecting their utility in sepsis and cardiovascular emergencies. Neuron-specific enolase, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin were the biomarkers considered needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most frequently used biomarkers in ED were troponin, D-dimer, BNP/NT-proBNP, and procalcitonin. NSE, IL-6, and procalcitonin were the most recommended for future integration. High costs, limited availability, and false-positive concerns remain significant challenges in biomarker use.</p>","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":"164-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of biomarkers testing in Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Sonia Luka, Adela Golea, Raluca Mihaela Tat, Eugenia Maria Lupan Mureșan, George Teo Voicescu, Ștefan Cristian Vesa, Maria Adriana Albu, Daniela Ionescu\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jccm-2024-0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the fast-paced environment of Emergency Departments (EDs), biomarkers are essential for the rapid diagnosis and management of critical conditions.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This study evaluates the current clinical practice on key biomarkers in Romanian EDs, addressing the needs of emergency medicine physicians, and the challenges associated with biomarker testing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to physicians working in ED to explore their perceptions, needs, and barriers regarding biomarkers, including Point-of-care (POC). Data was collected anonymously through an online platform and subsequently analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This survey analyzed data from 168 completed responses, with 95.2% of respondents being specialists in emergency medicine. Procalcitonin and presepsin were most preferred for PoCT, while troponin and D-dimer were highly rated regardless of the testing method, reflecting their utility in sepsis and cardiovascular emergencies. Neuron-specific enolase, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin were the biomarkers considered needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most frequently used biomarkers in ED were troponin, D-dimer, BNP/NT-proBNP, and procalcitonin. NSE, IL-6, and procalcitonin were the most recommended for future integration. High costs, limited availability, and false-positive concerns remain significant challenges in biomarker use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"164-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080561/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2024-0041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2024-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of biomarkers testing in Emergency Department.
Introduction: In the fast-paced environment of Emergency Departments (EDs), biomarkers are essential for the rapid diagnosis and management of critical conditions.
Aim of the study: This study evaluates the current clinical practice on key biomarkers in Romanian EDs, addressing the needs of emergency medicine physicians, and the challenges associated with biomarker testing.
Material and methods: An online survey was sent to physicians working in ED to explore their perceptions, needs, and barriers regarding biomarkers, including Point-of-care (POC). Data was collected anonymously through an online platform and subsequently analyzed.
Results: This survey analyzed data from 168 completed responses, with 95.2% of respondents being specialists in emergency medicine. Procalcitonin and presepsin were most preferred for PoCT, while troponin and D-dimer were highly rated regardless of the testing method, reflecting their utility in sepsis and cardiovascular emergencies. Neuron-specific enolase, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin were the biomarkers considered needed.
Conclusions: The most frequently used biomarkers in ED were troponin, D-dimer, BNP/NT-proBNP, and procalcitonin. NSE, IL-6, and procalcitonin were the most recommended for future integration. High costs, limited availability, and false-positive concerns remain significant challenges in biomarker use.