多中心研究提高抗心磷脂和抗β -糖蛋白I抗体检测结果诊断抗磷脂综合征的临床解释。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Lieve Van Hoovels, Silvia Piantoni, Els Bailleul, Sofie Schouwers, Massimo Radin, Maria Infantino, Emirena M Garrafa, Bo Massa, Siska Blomme, Stefanie Van Den Bremt, Bert Vander Cruyssen, Katrien M Devreese, Angela Tincani, Savino Sciascia, Xavier Bossuyt
{"title":"多中心研究提高抗心磷脂和抗β -糖蛋白I抗体检测结果诊断抗磷脂综合征的临床解释。","authors":"Lieve Van Hoovels, Silvia Piantoni, Els Bailleul, Sofie Schouwers, Massimo Radin, Maria Infantino, Emirena M Garrafa, Bo Massa, Siska Blomme, Stefanie Van Den Bremt, Bert Vander Cruyssen, Katrien M Devreese, Angela Tincani, Savino Sciascia, Xavier Bossuyt","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI) antibodies are laboratory markers important for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis and classification. There is an important inter-assay variation among aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays. This study aims to harmonize aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI test result interpretation across assays.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Commercial aCL IgG/M and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI IgG/M assays of three different diagnostic companies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Orgentec, Werfen) were evaluated using 176 diagnostic samples from patients with APS and 433 disease controls. International APS reference materials (Harris/Louisville, Koike/Sapporo, NIBSC 21/266) were analysed to evaluate traceability. Reference values were verified using 120 healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using manufacturer's proposed cut-offs, there was large variability in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity among assays. Thresholds corresponding to 97.5% and 99.5% specificity in diseased controls were used to delimit test result intervals [negative (<97.5% specificity threshold), weak positive and high positive (>99.5% specificity threshold)]. Test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were concordant across the different aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays. For all assays, the LR for APS increased with increasing antibody level. Higher LRs were found for IgG than for IgM assays and for double and triple antibody positivity. The added diagnostic value of aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI IgM was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Defining thresholds for antibody levels and assigning test result interval-specific LRs allows alignment of clinical interpretation for aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter study to improve clinical interpretation of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibody test results for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Lieve Van Hoovels, Silvia Piantoni, Els Bailleul, Sofie Schouwers, Massimo Radin, Maria Infantino, Emirena M Garrafa, Bo Massa, Siska Blomme, Stefanie Van Den Bremt, Bert Vander Cruyssen, Katrien M Devreese, Angela Tincani, Savino Sciascia, Xavier Bossuyt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI) antibodies are laboratory markers important for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis and classification. There is an important inter-assay variation among aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays. This study aims to harmonize aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI test result interpretation across assays.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Commercial aCL IgG/M and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI IgG/M assays of three different diagnostic companies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Orgentec, Werfen) were evaluated using 176 diagnostic samples from patients with APS and 433 disease controls. International APS reference materials (Harris/Louisville, Koike/Sapporo, NIBSC 21/266) were analysed to evaluate traceability. Reference values were verified using 120 healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using manufacturer's proposed cut-offs, there was large variability in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity among assays. Thresholds corresponding to 97.5% and 99.5% specificity in diseased controls were used to delimit test result intervals [negative (<97.5% specificity threshold), weak positive and high positive (>99.5% specificity threshold)]. Test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were concordant across the different aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays. For all assays, the LR for APS increased with increasing antibody level. Higher LRs were found for IgG than for IgM assays and for double and triple antibody positivity. The added diagnostic value of aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI IgM was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Defining thresholds for antibody levels and assigning test result interval-specific LRs allows alignment of clinical interpretation for aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.05.008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.05.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗心磷脂(aCL)和抗β -糖蛋白I (a - β 2gpi)抗体是抗磷脂综合征(APS)诊断和分类的重要实验室标志物。aCL和a - β 2gpi测定之间存在重要的测定间差异。本研究旨在协调aCL和a - β 2gpi测试结果在不同分析中的解释。材料和方法:使用来自APS患者的176份诊断样本和433份疾病对照,对三家不同诊断公司(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Orgentec, Werfen)的商用aCL IgG/M和aβ2GPI IgG/M检测进行了评估。分析国际APS标准物质(Harris/Louisville, Koike/Sapporo, NIBSC 21/266)的可追溯性。使用120名健康对照验证参考值。结果:使用制造商提出的截止值,在诊断敏感性和特异性方面存在很大的差异。采用相应于患病对照97.5%和99.5%特异性的阈值来划定检测结果区间[阴性(99.5%特异性阈值)]。不同aCL和a - β 2gpi检测结果的区间特异性似然比(LRs)是一致的。在所有试验中,APS的LR随抗体水平的升高而升高。IgG的LRs高于IgM,双抗体和三抗体阳性的LRs也高于IgM。a - β 2gpi IgM的附加诊断价值有限。结论:确定抗体水平的阈值和分配检测结果的区间特异性LRs可以使aCL和aβ2GPI检测的临床解释保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter study to improve clinical interpretation of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibody test results for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Introduction: Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies are laboratory markers important for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis and classification. There is an important inter-assay variation among aCL and aβ2GPI assays. This study aims to harmonize aCL and aβ2GPI test result interpretation across assays.

Materials and methods: Commercial aCL IgG/M and aβ2GPI IgG/M assays of three different diagnostic companies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Orgentec, Werfen) were evaluated using 176 diagnostic samples from patients with APS and 433 disease controls. International APS reference materials (Harris/Louisville, Koike/Sapporo, NIBSC 21/266) were analysed to evaluate traceability. Reference values were verified using 120 healthy controls.

Results: Using manufacturer's proposed cut-offs, there was large variability in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity among assays. Thresholds corresponding to 97.5% and 99.5% specificity in diseased controls were used to delimit test result intervals [negative (<97.5% specificity threshold), weak positive and high positive (>99.5% specificity threshold)]. Test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were concordant across the different aCL and aβ2GPI assays. For all assays, the LR for APS increased with increasing antibody level. Higher LRs were found for IgG than for IgM assays and for double and triple antibody positivity. The added diagnostic value of aβ2GPI IgM was limited.

Conclusion: Defining thresholds for antibody levels and assigning test result interval-specific LRs allows alignment of clinical interpretation for aCL and aβ2GPI assays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信