Lieve Van Hoovels, Silvia Piantoni, Els Bailleul, Sofie Schouwers, Massimo Radin, Maria Infantino, Emirena M Garrafa, Bo Massa, Siska Blomme, Stefanie Van Den Bremt, Bert Vander Cruyssen, Katrien M Devreese, Angela Tincani, Savino Sciascia, Xavier Bossuyt
{"title":"多中心研究提高抗心磷脂和抗β -糖蛋白I抗体检测结果诊断抗磷脂综合征的临床解释。","authors":"Lieve Van Hoovels, Silvia Piantoni, Els Bailleul, Sofie Schouwers, Massimo Radin, Maria Infantino, Emirena M Garrafa, Bo Massa, Siska Blomme, Stefanie Van Den Bremt, Bert Vander Cruyssen, Katrien M Devreese, Angela Tincani, Savino Sciascia, Xavier Bossuyt","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI) antibodies are laboratory markers important for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis and classification. There is an important inter-assay variation among aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays. This study aims to harmonize aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI test result interpretation across assays.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Commercial aCL IgG/M and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI IgG/M assays of three different diagnostic companies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Orgentec, Werfen) were evaluated using 176 diagnostic samples from patients with APS and 433 disease controls. International APS reference materials (Harris/Louisville, Koike/Sapporo, NIBSC 21/266) were analysed to evaluate traceability. Reference values were verified using 120 healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using manufacturer's proposed cut-offs, there was large variability in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity among assays. Thresholds corresponding to 97.5% and 99.5% specificity in diseased controls were used to delimit test result intervals [negative (<97.5% specificity threshold), weak positive and high positive (>99.5% specificity threshold)]. Test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were concordant across the different aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays. For all assays, the LR for APS increased with increasing antibody level. Higher LRs were found for IgG than for IgM assays and for double and triple antibody positivity. The added diagnostic value of aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI IgM was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Defining thresholds for antibody levels and assigning test result interval-specific LRs allows alignment of clinical interpretation for aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter study to improve clinical interpretation of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibody test results for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Lieve Van Hoovels, Silvia Piantoni, Els Bailleul, Sofie Schouwers, Massimo Radin, Maria Infantino, Emirena M Garrafa, Bo Massa, Siska Blomme, Stefanie Van Den Bremt, Bert Vander Cruyssen, Katrien M Devreese, Angela Tincani, Savino Sciascia, Xavier Bossuyt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI) antibodies are laboratory markers important for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis and classification. There is an important inter-assay variation among aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays. This study aims to harmonize aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI test result interpretation across assays.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Commercial aCL IgG/M and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI IgG/M assays of three different diagnostic companies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Orgentec, Werfen) were evaluated using 176 diagnostic samples from patients with APS and 433 disease controls. International APS reference materials (Harris/Louisville, Koike/Sapporo, NIBSC 21/266) were analysed to evaluate traceability. Reference values were verified using 120 healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using manufacturer's proposed cut-offs, there was large variability in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity among assays. Thresholds corresponding to 97.5% and 99.5% specificity in diseased controls were used to delimit test result intervals [negative (<97.5% specificity threshold), weak positive and high positive (>99.5% specificity threshold)]. Test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were concordant across the different aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays. For all assays, the LR for APS increased with increasing antibody level. Higher LRs were found for IgG than for IgM assays and for double and triple antibody positivity. The added diagnostic value of aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI IgM was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Defining thresholds for antibody levels and assigning test result interval-specific LRs allows alignment of clinical interpretation for aCL and aβ<sub>2</sub>GPI assays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.05.008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.05.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multicenter study to improve clinical interpretation of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibody test results for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.
Introduction: Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies are laboratory markers important for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis and classification. There is an important inter-assay variation among aCL and aβ2GPI assays. This study aims to harmonize aCL and aβ2GPI test result interpretation across assays.
Materials and methods: Commercial aCL IgG/M and aβ2GPI IgG/M assays of three different diagnostic companies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Orgentec, Werfen) were evaluated using 176 diagnostic samples from patients with APS and 433 disease controls. International APS reference materials (Harris/Louisville, Koike/Sapporo, NIBSC 21/266) were analysed to evaluate traceability. Reference values were verified using 120 healthy controls.
Results: Using manufacturer's proposed cut-offs, there was large variability in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity among assays. Thresholds corresponding to 97.5% and 99.5% specificity in diseased controls were used to delimit test result intervals [negative (<97.5% specificity threshold), weak positive and high positive (>99.5% specificity threshold)]. Test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were concordant across the different aCL and aβ2GPI assays. For all assays, the LR for APS increased with increasing antibody level. Higher LRs were found for IgG than for IgM assays and for double and triple antibody positivity. The added diagnostic value of aβ2GPI IgM was limited.
Conclusion: Defining thresholds for antibody levels and assigning test result interval-specific LRs allows alignment of clinical interpretation for aCL and aβ2GPI assays.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community.
Types of Publications:
The journal publishes a variety of content, including:
Original research reports
State-of-the-art reviews
Brief reports
Case reports
Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal
Forum articles
Correspondence
Announcements
Scope of Contributions:
Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include:
Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis
Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis
Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms
Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases
Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.