D3淋巴结清扫改善cT2N0结直肠癌患者围手术期预后和总生存率。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-30 Epub Date: 2025-04-27 DOI:10.21037/jgo-2024-980
Bolun Song, Liming Wang, Yinggang Chen, Yasumitsu Hirano
{"title":"D3淋巴结清扫改善cT2N0结直肠癌患者围手术期预后和总生存率。","authors":"Bolun Song, Liming Wang, Yinggang Chen, Yasumitsu Hirano","doi":"10.21037/jgo-2024-980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extent of lymphadenectomy undertaken in patients with cT2N0 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare survival in such patients by level of lymph node dissection (LND) performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume cancer center in Japan. Eligible patients (n=524) submitted to radical resections for cT2N0 CRC between April 2007 and December 2020 were included. Subjects were subsequently stratified by nature of LND (D2 <i>vs.</i> D3) and propensity score matched at 1:2 ratio. We then analyzed group rates of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) before and after matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before matching, the D3 (<i>vs.</i> D2) LND group experienced a shorter mean operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and a briefer average hospital stay, showing significantly better OS (P=0.001) as well. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) was 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-3.9; P=0.04]. After matching, a significant difference in OS (P=0.007) was still observed, with an estimated HR of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.0-5.1; P=0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>D3 LND improves perioperative outcomes and OS in patients with cT2N0 CRC. Accurate preoperative imaging diagnostics are critical for proper surgical management for cT2N0 CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","volume":"16 2","pages":"517-527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"D3 lymph node dissection improves perioperative outcomes and overall survival in patients with cT2N0 colorectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Bolun Song, Liming Wang, Yinggang Chen, Yasumitsu Hirano\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jgo-2024-980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extent of lymphadenectomy undertaken in patients with cT2N0 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare survival in such patients by level of lymph node dissection (LND) performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume cancer center in Japan. Eligible patients (n=524) submitted to radical resections for cT2N0 CRC between April 2007 and December 2020 were included. Subjects were subsequently stratified by nature of LND (D2 <i>vs.</i> D3) and propensity score matched at 1:2 ratio. We then analyzed group rates of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) before and after matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before matching, the D3 (<i>vs.</i> D2) LND group experienced a shorter mean operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and a briefer average hospital stay, showing significantly better OS (P=0.001) as well. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) was 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-3.9; P=0.04]. After matching, a significant difference in OS (P=0.007) was still observed, with an estimated HR of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.0-5.1; P=0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>D3 LND improves perioperative outcomes and OS in patients with cT2N0 CRC. Accurate preoperative imaging diagnostics are critical for proper surgical management for cT2N0 CRC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"517-527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078825/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-2024-980\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-2024-980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:cT2N0型结直肠癌(CRC)患者行淋巴结切除术的程度仍有争议。本研究的目的是比较不同淋巴结清扫(LND)水平患者的生存率。方法:这项回顾性队列研究是在日本的一个高容量癌症中心进行的。纳入了2007年4月至2020年12月期间接受cT2N0 CRC根治性切除术的符合条件的患者(n=524)。随后根据LND的性质(D2 vs D3)对受试者进行分层,倾向评分按1:2的比例匹配。然后分析配对前后各组总生存率(OS)和无复发生存率(RFS)。结果:在配对前,D3组(相对于D2组)平均手术时间更短,术中出血量更少,术后并发症更少,平均住院时间更短,OS也明显更好(P=0.001)。估计风险比(HR)为2.0[95%置信区间(CI): 1.0-3.9;P = 0.04)。匹配后,仍观察到OS的显著差异(P=0.007),估计HR为2.3 (95% CI: 1.0-5.1;P = 0.044)。结论:D3 LND改善cT2N0 CRC患者的围手术期结局和OS。准确的术前影像学诊断对于cT2N0型结直肠癌的手术治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
D3 lymph node dissection improves perioperative outcomes and overall survival in patients with cT2N0 colorectal cancer.

Background: The extent of lymphadenectomy undertaken in patients with cT2N0 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare survival in such patients by level of lymph node dissection (LND) performed.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume cancer center in Japan. Eligible patients (n=524) submitted to radical resections for cT2N0 CRC between April 2007 and December 2020 were included. Subjects were subsequently stratified by nature of LND (D2 vs. D3) and propensity score matched at 1:2 ratio. We then analyzed group rates of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) before and after matching.

Results: Before matching, the D3 (vs. D2) LND group experienced a shorter mean operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and a briefer average hospital stay, showing significantly better OS (P=0.001) as well. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) was 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-3.9; P=0.04]. After matching, a significant difference in OS (P=0.007) was still observed, with an estimated HR of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.0-5.1; P=0.044).

Conclusions: D3 LND improves perioperative outcomes and OS in patients with cT2N0 CRC. Accurate preoperative imaging diagnostics are critical for proper surgical management for cT2N0 CRC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: ournal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (Print ISSN 2078-6891; Online ISSN 2219-679X; J Gastrointest Oncol; JGO), the official journal of Society for Gastrointestinal Oncology (SGO), is an open-access, international peer-reviewed journal. It is published quarterly (Sep. 2010- Dec. 2013), bimonthly (Feb. 2014 -) and openly distributed worldwide. JGO publishes manuscripts that focus on updated and practical information about diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging and tumor biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信