我们能预测老年晚期慢性肾病患者的死亡率吗?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Angela Chou, Sanjay Farshid, Mark A Brown, Kelly Chenlei Li
{"title":"我们能预测老年晚期慢性肾病患者的死亡率吗?","authors":"Angela Chou, Sanjay Farshid, Mark A Brown, Kelly Chenlei Li","doi":"10.1111/imj.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) desire to know their prognosis. Although many predictive tools exist, they are not widely used in clinical practice as their applicability is not clear, particularly for older patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the validity of existing prognostic tools in older patients with advanced CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre retrospective validation cohort study on patients aged ≥65 years with grade 4 or 5 CKD between 2009 and 2018. The Ivory, Schmidt and Cohen models were tested by comparing predicted and actual mortality outcomes. Discriminatory ability was measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. The global performance of the predictive regression models was assessed using the measure of goodness of fit with the coefficient of determination Nagalkerke R<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 387 patients with a median age of 80 years (IQR 74-85) were included in the study. For the Ivory and Schmidt models, the c-statistic was 0.617 (95% CI 0.47-0.74) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.71) respectively, indicating poor discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic was 1.42 (P = 0.22) and 1.59 (P = 0.15) respectively, indicating reasonable calibration. The Cohen model had an overall poor predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Existing prognostication tools demonstrate overall suboptimal performance in our validation cohort of older patients. Further research is needed for the development of a prognostic tool specific to the older advanced CKD population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can we predict mortality of older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease?\",\"authors\":\"Angela Chou, Sanjay Farshid, Mark A Brown, Kelly Chenlei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) desire to know their prognosis. Although many predictive tools exist, they are not widely used in clinical practice as their applicability is not clear, particularly for older patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the validity of existing prognostic tools in older patients with advanced CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre retrospective validation cohort study on patients aged ≥65 years with grade 4 or 5 CKD between 2009 and 2018. The Ivory, Schmidt and Cohen models were tested by comparing predicted and actual mortality outcomes. Discriminatory ability was measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. The global performance of the predictive regression models was assessed using the measure of goodness of fit with the coefficient of determination Nagalkerke R<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 387 patients with a median age of 80 years (IQR 74-85) were included in the study. For the Ivory and Schmidt models, the c-statistic was 0.617 (95% CI 0.47-0.74) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.71) respectively, indicating poor discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic was 1.42 (P = 0.22) and 1.59 (P = 0.15) respectively, indicating reasonable calibration. The Cohen model had an overall poor predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Existing prognostication tools demonstrate overall suboptimal performance in our validation cohort of older patients. Further research is needed for the development of a prognostic tool specific to the older advanced CKD population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70089\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,晚期慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者希望了解自己的预后。尽管存在许多预测工具,但由于其适用性尚不明确,特别是对老年患者的适用性尚不明确,因此在临床实践中并未得到广泛应用。目的:评价现有预后工具在老年晚期CKD患者中的有效性。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性验证队列研究,研究对象是2009年至2018年间年龄≥65岁的4级或5级CKD患者。通过比较预测和实际的死亡率结果,对Ivory、Schmidt和Cohen模型进行了测试。鉴别能力用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来衡量,校正能力用Hosmer-Lemeshow统计量来评定。采用决定系数Nagalkerke R2衡量拟合优度来评估预测回归模型的整体性能。结果:共纳入387例患者,中位年龄为80岁(IQR 74-85)。对于Ivory和Schmidt模型,c统计量分别为0.617 (95% CI 0.47-0.74)和0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.71),表明判别性差。Hosmer-Lemeshow统计量分别为1.42 (P = 0.22)和1.59 (P = 0.15),说明校正合理。科恩模型的预测价值总体上很差。结论:在我们的老年患者验证队列中,现有的预后工具总体上表现不佳。需要进一步研究开发针对老年晚期CKD人群的预后工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can we predict mortality of older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease?

Background: Studies have shown that patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) desire to know their prognosis. Although many predictive tools exist, they are not widely used in clinical practice as their applicability is not clear, particularly for older patients.

Aim: To evaluate the validity of existing prognostic tools in older patients with advanced CKD.

Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective validation cohort study on patients aged ≥65 years with grade 4 or 5 CKD between 2009 and 2018. The Ivory, Schmidt and Cohen models were tested by comparing predicted and actual mortality outcomes. Discriminatory ability was measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. The global performance of the predictive regression models was assessed using the measure of goodness of fit with the coefficient of determination Nagalkerke R2.

Results: A total of 387 patients with a median age of 80 years (IQR 74-85) were included in the study. For the Ivory and Schmidt models, the c-statistic was 0.617 (95% CI 0.47-0.74) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.71) respectively, indicating poor discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic was 1.42 (P = 0.22) and 1.59 (P = 0.15) respectively, indicating reasonable calibration. The Cohen model had an overall poor predictive value.

Conclusion: Existing prognostication tools demonstrate overall suboptimal performance in our validation cohort of older patients. Further research is needed for the development of a prognostic tool specific to the older advanced CKD population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信