脓毒症管理的多药物方法。

IF 2.3 Q3 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Healthcare Informatics Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.209
Victor Iapascurta, Ion Fiodorov, Adrian Belii, Viorel Bostan
{"title":"脓毒症管理的多药物方法。","authors":"Victor Iapascurta, Ion Fiodorov, Adrian Belii, Viorel Bostan","doi":"10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The high incidence of sepsis necessitates the development of practical decision-making tools for intensivists, especially during the early, critical phases of management. This study evaluates a multi-agent system intended to assist clinicians with antibiotic therapy and adherence to current sepsis management guidelines before diagnostic results become available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-agent system incorporating three specialized agents was developed: a sepsis management agent, an antibiotic recommendation agent, and a sepsis guidelines compliance agent. A sepsis case from the MIMIC IV database, organized as a clinical vignette, was used to integrate and test these agents for generating management recommendations. The system leverages retrieval-augmented generation to improve decision-making through the integration of current literature and guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The application produced management recommendations for a sepsis case associated with pneumonia, including early initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics and close monitoring for clinical deterioration. Two expert intensivists evaluated these recommendations as \"acceptable\" and reported moderate interrater agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.622, p = 0.003) across various aspects of recommendation usefulness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multi-agent system shows promise in enhancing decision-making for sepsis management by optimizing antibiotic therapy and ensuring guideline compliance. However, reliance on a single case study limits the generalizability of the findings, highlighting the need for broader validation in diverse clinical settings to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12947,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Informatics Research","volume":"31 2","pages":"209-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Agent Approach for Sepsis Management.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Iapascurta, Ion Fiodorov, Adrian Belii, Viorel Bostan\",\"doi\":\"10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The high incidence of sepsis necessitates the development of practical decision-making tools for intensivists, especially during the early, critical phases of management. This study evaluates a multi-agent system intended to assist clinicians with antibiotic therapy and adherence to current sepsis management guidelines before diagnostic results become available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-agent system incorporating three specialized agents was developed: a sepsis management agent, an antibiotic recommendation agent, and a sepsis guidelines compliance agent. A sepsis case from the MIMIC IV database, organized as a clinical vignette, was used to integrate and test these agents for generating management recommendations. The system leverages retrieval-augmented generation to improve decision-making through the integration of current literature and guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The application produced management recommendations for a sepsis case associated with pneumonia, including early initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics and close monitoring for clinical deterioration. Two expert intensivists evaluated these recommendations as \\\"acceptable\\\" and reported moderate interrater agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.622, p = 0.003) across various aspects of recommendation usefulness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multi-agent system shows promise in enhancing decision-making for sepsis management by optimizing antibiotic therapy and ensuring guideline compliance. However, reliance on a single case study limits the generalizability of the findings, highlighting the need for broader validation in diverse clinical settings to improve patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Informatics Research\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"209-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Informatics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Informatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脓毒症的高发病率需要为重症医师开发实用的决策工具,特别是在早期,关键的管理阶段。本研究评估了一种多药系统,旨在帮助临床医生进行抗生素治疗,并在诊断结果出来之前遵守当前的败血症管理指南。方法:开发了包含三种专门药物的多药物系统:脓毒症管理药物,抗生素推荐药物和脓毒症指南依从性药物。来自MIMIC IV数据库的脓毒症病例,作为临床小插曲组织,用于整合和测试这些药物以产生管理建议。该系统利用检索增强生成,通过整合当前文献和指南来改进决策。结果:该应用程序产生了与肺炎相关的脓毒症病例的管理建议,包括早期开始使用广谱抗生素和密切监测临床恶化。两名专家评估这些建议为“可接受的”,并报告了在建议有用性的各个方面的中度仲裁者一致性(Cohen’s kappa = 0.622, p = 0.003)。结论:通过优化抗生素治疗和确保指南的遵守,多药物系统有望加强败血症管理的决策。然而,对单一病例研究的依赖限制了研究结果的普遍性,强调需要在不同的临床环境中进行更广泛的验证,以改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-Agent Approach for Sepsis Management.

Objectives: The high incidence of sepsis necessitates the development of practical decision-making tools for intensivists, especially during the early, critical phases of management. This study evaluates a multi-agent system intended to assist clinicians with antibiotic therapy and adherence to current sepsis management guidelines before diagnostic results become available.

Methods: A multi-agent system incorporating three specialized agents was developed: a sepsis management agent, an antibiotic recommendation agent, and a sepsis guidelines compliance agent. A sepsis case from the MIMIC IV database, organized as a clinical vignette, was used to integrate and test these agents for generating management recommendations. The system leverages retrieval-augmented generation to improve decision-making through the integration of current literature and guidelines.

Results: The application produced management recommendations for a sepsis case associated with pneumonia, including early initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics and close monitoring for clinical deterioration. Two expert intensivists evaluated these recommendations as "acceptable" and reported moderate interrater agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.622, p = 0.003) across various aspects of recommendation usefulness.

Conclusions: The multi-agent system shows promise in enhancing decision-making for sepsis management by optimizing antibiotic therapy and ensuring guideline compliance. However, reliance on a single case study limits the generalizability of the findings, highlighting the need for broader validation in diverse clinical settings to improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Informatics Research
Healthcare Informatics Research MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信