医学中的大型语言模型:临床应用、技术挑战和伦理考虑。

IF 2.3 Q3 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Healthcare Informatics Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.114
Kyu-Hwan Jung
{"title":"医学中的大型语言模型:临床应用、技术挑战和伦理考虑。","authors":"Kyu-Hwan Jung","doi":"10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study presents a comprehensive review of the clinical applications, technical challenges, and ethical considerations associated with using large language models (LLMs) in medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature survey of peer-reviewed articles, technical reports, and expert commentary from relevant medical and artificial intelligence journals was conducted. Key clinical application areas, technical limitations (e.g., accuracy, validation, transparency), and ethical issues (e.g., bias, safety, accountability, privacy) were identified and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LLMs have potential in clinical documentation assistance, decision support, patient communication, and workflow optimization. The level of supporting evidence varies; documentation support applications are relatively mature, whereas autonomous diagnostics continue to face notable limitations regarding accuracy and validation. Key technical challenges include model hallucination, lack of robust clinical validation, integration issues, and limited transparency. Ethical concerns involve algorithmic bias risking health inequities, threats to patient safety from inaccuracies, unclear accountability, data privacy, and impacts on clinician-patient interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLMs possess transformative potential for clinical medicine, particularly by augmenting clinician capabilities. However, substantial technical and ethical hurdles necessitate rigorous research, validation, clearly defined guidelines, and human oversight. Existing evidence supports an assistive rather than autonomous role, mandating careful, evidence-based integration that prioritizes patient safety and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12947,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Informatics Research","volume":"31 2","pages":"114-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Language Models in Medicine: Clinical Applications, Technical Challenges, and Ethical Considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Kyu-Hwan Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study presents a comprehensive review of the clinical applications, technical challenges, and ethical considerations associated with using large language models (LLMs) in medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature survey of peer-reviewed articles, technical reports, and expert commentary from relevant medical and artificial intelligence journals was conducted. Key clinical application areas, technical limitations (e.g., accuracy, validation, transparency), and ethical issues (e.g., bias, safety, accountability, privacy) were identified and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LLMs have potential in clinical documentation assistance, decision support, patient communication, and workflow optimization. The level of supporting evidence varies; documentation support applications are relatively mature, whereas autonomous diagnostics continue to face notable limitations regarding accuracy and validation. Key technical challenges include model hallucination, lack of robust clinical validation, integration issues, and limited transparency. Ethical concerns involve algorithmic bias risking health inequities, threats to patient safety from inaccuracies, unclear accountability, data privacy, and impacts on clinician-patient interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLMs possess transformative potential for clinical medicine, particularly by augmenting clinician capabilities. However, substantial technical and ethical hurdles necessitate rigorous research, validation, clearly defined guidelines, and human oversight. Existing evidence supports an assistive rather than autonomous role, mandating careful, evidence-based integration that prioritizes patient safety and equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Informatics Research\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"114-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Informatics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Informatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究全面回顾了在医学中使用大型语言模型(LLMs)的临床应用、技术挑战和伦理考虑。方法:对相关医学和人工智能期刊的同行评议文章、技术报告和专家评论进行文献调查。确定并分析了关键的临床应用领域、技术限制(如准确性、有效性、透明度)和伦理问题(如偏见、安全性、问责制、隐私)。结果:法学硕士在临床文件协助、决策支持、患者沟通和工作流程优化方面具有潜力。支持证据的水平各不相同;文档支持应用程序相对成熟,而自主诊断在准确性和有效性方面仍然面临着明显的限制。关键的技术挑战包括模型幻觉、缺乏可靠的临床验证、整合问题和有限的透明度。伦理问题包括算法偏差可能导致卫生不公平、不准确对患者安全的威胁、不明确的问责制、数据隐私以及对临床与患者互动的影响。结论:法学硕士具有临床医学的变革潜力,特别是通过增强临床医生的能力。然而,大量的技术和伦理障碍需要严格的研究、验证、明确定义的指导方针和人类监督。现有证据支持辅助而非自主作用,要求谨慎、循证整合,优先考虑患者安全和公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large Language Models in Medicine: Clinical Applications, Technical Challenges, and Ethical Considerations.

Objectives: This study presents a comprehensive review of the clinical applications, technical challenges, and ethical considerations associated with using large language models (LLMs) in medicine.

Methods: A literature survey of peer-reviewed articles, technical reports, and expert commentary from relevant medical and artificial intelligence journals was conducted. Key clinical application areas, technical limitations (e.g., accuracy, validation, transparency), and ethical issues (e.g., bias, safety, accountability, privacy) were identified and analyzed.

Results: LLMs have potential in clinical documentation assistance, decision support, patient communication, and workflow optimization. The level of supporting evidence varies; documentation support applications are relatively mature, whereas autonomous diagnostics continue to face notable limitations regarding accuracy and validation. Key technical challenges include model hallucination, lack of robust clinical validation, integration issues, and limited transparency. Ethical concerns involve algorithmic bias risking health inequities, threats to patient safety from inaccuracies, unclear accountability, data privacy, and impacts on clinician-patient interactions.

Conclusions: LLMs possess transformative potential for clinical medicine, particularly by augmenting clinician capabilities. However, substantial technical and ethical hurdles necessitate rigorous research, validation, clearly defined guidelines, and human oversight. Existing evidence supports an assistive rather than autonomous role, mandating careful, evidence-based integration that prioritizes patient safety and equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Informatics Research
Healthcare Informatics Research MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信