儿科血友病关节病的即时超声评价:综合超声和MRI的前瞻性比较研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Haemophilia Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1111/hae.70049
Caroline Rutten, Magdy Soliman, Jyoti Panwar, Arun Mohanta, Alex Zhou, Pamela Hilliard, Tammy Rayner, Ruth Weiss, Carina Man, Rahim Moineddin, Manuel Carcao, Vanessa Bouskill, Jennifer Stimec, Kevon Dindial, Deidre Tetzlaff, Victor S Blanchette In Memoriam, Andrea S Doria
{"title":"儿科血友病关节病的即时超声评价:综合超声和MRI的前瞻性比较研究。","authors":"Caroline Rutten, Magdy Soliman, Jyoti Panwar, Arun Mohanta, Alex Zhou, Pamela Hilliard, Tammy Rayner, Ruth Weiss, Carina Man, Rahim Moineddin, Manuel Carcao, Vanessa Bouskill, Jennifer Stimec, Kevon Dindial, Deidre Tetzlaff, Victor S Blanchette In Memoriam, Andrea S Doria","doi":"10.1111/hae.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care (POC) ultrasound (US) in detecting joint changes in haemophilic arthropathy compared to comprehensive US, physical examination and MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre, prospective study examining 22 ankles, eight knees and nine elbows of 28 subjects (median/range, 16/6-27 years) with inherited bleeding disorders. Same-day physical and imaging joint assessment was performed using Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) 2.1, POC-US, comprehensive US and MRI. Two readers reviewed the imaging studies using standardized scoring systems. The inter-reader agreement was assessed with weighted kappa statistics. Diagnostic test performance of POC-US and comprehensive US was benchmarked against MRI findings using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy. Spearman correlation was used to correlate physical examination and imaging findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate inter-reader agreement was observed for soft-tissue changes (kappa = 0.58), which was lower than comprehensive US (kappa = 0.76) and MRI (kappa = 0.77). Agreement for osteochondral lesions was poor (κ 0.09), trailing behind comprehensive US (kappa = 0.55) and MRI (kappa = 0.75). POC-US showed reduced accuracy across all joint parameters in the elbows and ankles compared to comprehensive US, but comparable diagnostic performance in the knees. A good correlation was noted between total POC-US scores and HJHS (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001), similar to comprehensive US (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POC-US is valuable for assessing soft-tissue changes in haemophilic arthropathy, correlates satisfactorily with physical examination, but its accuracy is inferior to comprehensive US for ankles and elbows. Both POC-US and comprehensive US should be employed cautiously for assessing osteochondral joint abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12819,"journal":{"name":"Haemophilia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Paediatric Haemophilic Arthropathy: A Prospective Comparative Study With Comprehensive Ultrasound and MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Rutten, Magdy Soliman, Jyoti Panwar, Arun Mohanta, Alex Zhou, Pamela Hilliard, Tammy Rayner, Ruth Weiss, Carina Man, Rahim Moineddin, Manuel Carcao, Vanessa Bouskill, Jennifer Stimec, Kevon Dindial, Deidre Tetzlaff, Victor S Blanchette In Memoriam, Andrea S Doria\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hae.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care (POC) ultrasound (US) in detecting joint changes in haemophilic arthropathy compared to comprehensive US, physical examination and MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre, prospective study examining 22 ankles, eight knees and nine elbows of 28 subjects (median/range, 16/6-27 years) with inherited bleeding disorders. Same-day physical and imaging joint assessment was performed using Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) 2.1, POC-US, comprehensive US and MRI. Two readers reviewed the imaging studies using standardized scoring systems. The inter-reader agreement was assessed with weighted kappa statistics. Diagnostic test performance of POC-US and comprehensive US was benchmarked against MRI findings using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy. Spearman correlation was used to correlate physical examination and imaging findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate inter-reader agreement was observed for soft-tissue changes (kappa = 0.58), which was lower than comprehensive US (kappa = 0.76) and MRI (kappa = 0.77). Agreement for osteochondral lesions was poor (κ 0.09), trailing behind comprehensive US (kappa = 0.55) and MRI (kappa = 0.75). POC-US showed reduced accuracy across all joint parameters in the elbows and ankles compared to comprehensive US, but comparable diagnostic performance in the knees. A good correlation was noted between total POC-US scores and HJHS (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001), similar to comprehensive US (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POC-US is valuable for assessing soft-tissue changes in haemophilic arthropathy, correlates satisfactorily with physical examination, but its accuracy is inferior to comprehensive US for ankles and elbows. Both POC-US and comprehensive US should be employed cautiously for assessing osteochondral joint abnormalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haemophilia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haemophilia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70049\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemophilia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价即时超声(POC)对血友病关节病变的诊断准确性,并与综合超声、体格检查和MRI进行比较。方法:单中心前瞻性研究,检查28例遗传性出血性疾病患者的22个脚踝、8个膝盖和9个肘部(中位/范围16/6-27岁)。当日采用血友病关节健康评分(HJHS) 2.1、POC-US、综合US和MRI进行物理和影像学联合评估。两位读者回顾了使用标准化评分系统的影像学研究。用加权kappa统计来评估读者间的一致性。POC-US和综合US的诊断测试性能以MRI结果为基准,使用敏感性,特异性,预测值和准确性。Spearman相关性用于体格检查和影像学结果的相关性。结果:软组织改变的读者间一致性中等(kappa = 0.58),低于综合US (kappa = 0.76)和MRI (kappa = 0.77)。骨软骨病变的一致性较差(κ 0.09),落后于综合超声(kappa = 0.55)和MRI (kappa = 0.75)。与综合US相比,POC-US在肘部和踝关节的所有关节参数的准确性降低,但在膝关节的诊断性能相当。结论:POC-US对血友病关节病软组织变化的评估有价值,与体格检查有满意的相关性,但其准确性低于踝关节和肘部综合US。无论是POC-US还是综合超声,在评估骨软骨关节异常时都应谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Paediatric Haemophilic Arthropathy: A Prospective Comparative Study With Comprehensive Ultrasound and MRI.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care (POC) ultrasound (US) in detecting joint changes in haemophilic arthropathy compared to comprehensive US, physical examination and MRI.

Methods: Single-centre, prospective study examining 22 ankles, eight knees and nine elbows of 28 subjects (median/range, 16/6-27 years) with inherited bleeding disorders. Same-day physical and imaging joint assessment was performed using Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) 2.1, POC-US, comprehensive US and MRI. Two readers reviewed the imaging studies using standardized scoring systems. The inter-reader agreement was assessed with weighted kappa statistics. Diagnostic test performance of POC-US and comprehensive US was benchmarked against MRI findings using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy. Spearman correlation was used to correlate physical examination and imaging findings.

Results: Moderate inter-reader agreement was observed for soft-tissue changes (kappa = 0.58), which was lower than comprehensive US (kappa = 0.76) and MRI (kappa = 0.77). Agreement for osteochondral lesions was poor (κ 0.09), trailing behind comprehensive US (kappa = 0.55) and MRI (kappa = 0.75). POC-US showed reduced accuracy across all joint parameters in the elbows and ankles compared to comprehensive US, but comparable diagnostic performance in the knees. A good correlation was noted between total POC-US scores and HJHS (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001), similar to comprehensive US (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: POC-US is valuable for assessing soft-tissue changes in haemophilic arthropathy, correlates satisfactorily with physical examination, but its accuracy is inferior to comprehensive US for ankles and elbows. Both POC-US and comprehensive US should be employed cautiously for assessing osteochondral joint abnormalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Haemophilia
Haemophilia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
28.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haemophilia is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information regarding the comprehensive care of haemophilia. The Journal contains review articles, original scientific papers and case reports related to haemophilia care, with frequent supplements. Subjects covered include: clotting factor deficiencies, both inherited and acquired: haemophilia A, B, von Willebrand''s disease, deficiencies of factor V, VII, X and XI replacement therapy for clotting factor deficiencies component therapy in the developing world transfusion transmitted disease haemophilia care and paediatrics, orthopaedics, gynaecology and obstetrics nursing laboratory diagnosis carrier detection psycho-social concerns economic issues audit inherited platelet disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信