利用潜类和潜转变分析研究普通化学课学生科学态度的演变。

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Chemical Education Pub Date : 2025-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01247
Oluwatobi O Odeleye, Oluwaseun D Agunbiade, Adam Garber, Karen Nylund-Gibson
{"title":"利用潜类和潜转变分析研究普通化学课学生科学态度的演变。","authors":"Oluwatobi O Odeleye, Oluwaseun D Agunbiade, Adam Garber, Karen Nylund-Gibson","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education researchers continue to explore ways to increase college student persistence in STEM fields, the affective domain (e.g., attitudes, perceptions, and self-efficacy) stands out as an area that can significantly impact these efforts. Latent class analysis (LCA) and latent transition analysis (LTA) are mixture modeling approaches that take a person-centered approach to quantitative research, which can help us to further our efforts to diversify STEM fields. This study seeks to use LCA and LTA to investigate how students' attitudes toward science in general chemistry evolve over a semester. Using the <i>Modified Attitudes toward Science Inventory</i> (mATSI), we grouped students based on their responses to pre- and postsurvey items from the mATSI. We found three distinct groups (classes) of students at the beginning of the semester: (i) students with strong desires to pursue science fields and high self-belief in their abilities to do well in science courses (high-high), (ii) students with moderate desires and low self-belief (mod-low), and (iii) students with moderate desires to pursue science fields and moderate self-belief (mod-mod). Over the course of the semester, these 3 groups evolved into (a) high desires and high self-belief (high-high), (b) high desires and low self-belief (high-low), and (c) low desires and low self-belief (low-low). At the beginning of the semester, about 80% of the participants were classified in the high-high group with the remaining 20% categorized into the other two groups; however, by the end of the semester, about 70% were in the high-high group, with 30% distributed across the other two groups. Using LTA and exploring the characteristics of the student groups, we found that in groups where female and second-year students were overrepresented, male and first-year students tended to be underrepresented and vice versa. For example, female and second-year students were overrepresented in groups more likely to leave the general chemistry course with lower desires and self-belief, while male and first-year students were overrepresented in groups more likely to leave general chemistry with higher desires and self-belief Using the LCA approach, we were able to explore groups (e.g., \"high-low\" and \"low-low\") that tend to get swallowed up by the noise of the majority (in this case, the \"high-high\" group). We hope the findings from this study encourage equity-based researchers to continue to think about how they approach quantitative data to give a voice to participant groups that may sometimes be hidden under the guise of not having enough statistical significance/power.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 5","pages":"1745-1754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Evolution of Student Attitudes toward Science in a General Chemistry Course Using Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Oluwatobi O Odeleye, Oluwaseun D Agunbiade, Adam Garber, Karen Nylund-Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education researchers continue to explore ways to increase college student persistence in STEM fields, the affective domain (e.g., attitudes, perceptions, and self-efficacy) stands out as an area that can significantly impact these efforts. Latent class analysis (LCA) and latent transition analysis (LTA) are mixture modeling approaches that take a person-centered approach to quantitative research, which can help us to further our efforts to diversify STEM fields. This study seeks to use LCA and LTA to investigate how students' attitudes toward science in general chemistry evolve over a semester. Using the <i>Modified Attitudes toward Science Inventory</i> (mATSI), we grouped students based on their responses to pre- and postsurvey items from the mATSI. We found three distinct groups (classes) of students at the beginning of the semester: (i) students with strong desires to pursue science fields and high self-belief in their abilities to do well in science courses (high-high), (ii) students with moderate desires and low self-belief (mod-low), and (iii) students with moderate desires to pursue science fields and moderate self-belief (mod-mod). Over the course of the semester, these 3 groups evolved into (a) high desires and high self-belief (high-high), (b) high desires and low self-belief (high-low), and (c) low desires and low self-belief (low-low). At the beginning of the semester, about 80% of the participants were classified in the high-high group with the remaining 20% categorized into the other two groups; however, by the end of the semester, about 70% were in the high-high group, with 30% distributed across the other two groups. Using LTA and exploring the characteristics of the student groups, we found that in groups where female and second-year students were overrepresented, male and first-year students tended to be underrepresented and vice versa. For example, female and second-year students were overrepresented in groups more likely to leave the general chemistry course with lower desires and self-belief, while male and first-year students were overrepresented in groups more likely to leave general chemistry with higher desires and self-belief Using the LCA approach, we were able to explore groups (e.g., \\\"high-low\\\" and \\\"low-low\\\") that tend to get swallowed up by the noise of the majority (in this case, the \\\"high-high\\\" group). We hope the findings from this study encourage equity-based researchers to continue to think about how they approach quantitative data to give a voice to participant groups that may sometimes be hidden under the guise of not having enough statistical significance/power.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"102 5\",\"pages\":\"1745-1754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080113/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01247\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育研究人员继续探索提高大学生在STEM领域的坚持度的方法,情感领域(例如,态度、观念和自我效能感)作为一个可以显著影响这些努力的领域脱颖而出。潜在类分析(LCA)和潜在转移分析(LTA)是一种混合建模方法,采用以人为本的方法进行定量研究,可以帮助我们进一步努力实现STEM领域的多样化。本研究试图利用LCA和LTA来调查学生在一个学期中对普通化学科学的态度是如何演变的。使用改进的科学态度量表(mATSI),我们根据学生对mATSI调查前和调查后项目的反应对学生进行分组。我们在学期开始时发现了三种不同的学生群体(班级):(i)对科学领域有强烈的追求,对自己在科学课程上的表现有高度自信的学生(高-高),(ii)对科学领域有中等渴望,但对自己的能力有较低自信的学生(低-低),(iii)对科学领域有中等渴望,对自己有中等自信的学生(低-低)。在这学期的过程中,这三个群体演变成(a)高欲望和高自信(high-high), (b)高欲望和低自信(high-low), (c)低欲望和低自信(low-low)。在学期开始时,大约80%的参与者被划分为高-高组,剩下的20%被划分为其他两个组;然而,到学期结束时,大约70%的学生在高-高组,30%的学生分布在其他两个组。使用LTA并探索学生群体的特征,我们发现在女生和二年级学生人数过多的群体中,男生和一年级学生往往人数不足,反之亦然。例如,女生和二年级学生在更有可能带着较低的愿望和自信离开普通化学课程的群体中所占比例过高,而男生和一年级学生在更有可能带着较高的愿望和自信离开普通化学课程的群体中所占比例过高。使用LCA方法,我们能够探索容易被大多数人的噪音(在这种情况下,是“高-高”群体)所淹没的群体(例如,“高-低”和“低-低”)。我们希望这项研究的发现能鼓励以公平为基础的研究人员继续思考他们如何处理定量数据,为参与者群体提供发言权,这些群体有时可能被隐藏在没有足够的统计显著性/权力的幌子下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Evolution of Student Attitudes toward Science in a General Chemistry Course Using Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis.

As science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education researchers continue to explore ways to increase college student persistence in STEM fields, the affective domain (e.g., attitudes, perceptions, and self-efficacy) stands out as an area that can significantly impact these efforts. Latent class analysis (LCA) and latent transition analysis (LTA) are mixture modeling approaches that take a person-centered approach to quantitative research, which can help us to further our efforts to diversify STEM fields. This study seeks to use LCA and LTA to investigate how students' attitudes toward science in general chemistry evolve over a semester. Using the Modified Attitudes toward Science Inventory (mATSI), we grouped students based on their responses to pre- and postsurvey items from the mATSI. We found three distinct groups (classes) of students at the beginning of the semester: (i) students with strong desires to pursue science fields and high self-belief in their abilities to do well in science courses (high-high), (ii) students with moderate desires and low self-belief (mod-low), and (iii) students with moderate desires to pursue science fields and moderate self-belief (mod-mod). Over the course of the semester, these 3 groups evolved into (a) high desires and high self-belief (high-high), (b) high desires and low self-belief (high-low), and (c) low desires and low self-belief (low-low). At the beginning of the semester, about 80% of the participants were classified in the high-high group with the remaining 20% categorized into the other two groups; however, by the end of the semester, about 70% were in the high-high group, with 30% distributed across the other two groups. Using LTA and exploring the characteristics of the student groups, we found that in groups where female and second-year students were overrepresented, male and first-year students tended to be underrepresented and vice versa. For example, female and second-year students were overrepresented in groups more likely to leave the general chemistry course with lower desires and self-belief, while male and first-year students were overrepresented in groups more likely to leave general chemistry with higher desires and self-belief Using the LCA approach, we were able to explore groups (e.g., "high-low" and "low-low") that tend to get swallowed up by the noise of the majority (in this case, the "high-high" group). We hope the findings from this study encourage equity-based researchers to continue to think about how they approach quantitative data to give a voice to participant groups that may sometimes be hidden under the guise of not having enough statistical significance/power.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信