纹身油墨成分风险评估的计算机新方法的适用性

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Prachi Pradeep, Stefanie Seifert, Ajay Vikram Singh, Peter Laux, Ralph Pirow
{"title":"纹身油墨成分风险评估的计算机新方法的适用性","authors":"Prachi Pradeep,&nbsp;Stefanie Seifert,&nbsp;Ajay Vikram Singh,&nbsp;Peter Laux,&nbsp;Ralph Pirow","doi":"10.1002/em.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tattoo inks contain several substances, including organic and inorganic pigments, additives, and solvents, which may pose a health risk to not only the tattooed skin but also to other parts of the human body due to intradermal exposure. Substances in tattoo inks are regulated by entry 75 in Annex XVII of REACH Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006. However, despite these legal requirements, a well-defined criterion for the safety assessment of tattoo inks remains lacking. In this context, 2021 BfR opinion titled “Tattoo inks: minimum requirements and test methods” proposed a comprehensive risk assessment of pigments using in vitro/in-chemico data in accordance with OECD Guidelines and CLP Regulations. In the absence of experimental data, new approach methodologies (NAMs) may be used for data-gap filling. Therefore, this work evaluates the applicability of in silico NAMs for data-gap filling for a list of tattoo ink ingredients identified by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) and BfR for genotoxicity assessment. Experimental in vitro genotoxicity data were acquired from the International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) which makes non-confidential REACH Study Results publicly accessible. The specific aims of this analysis were the evaluation of in silico genotoxicity predictions from publicly available QSAR tools and structural alerts, the development and validation of new QSAR models specific to tattoo ink ingredients, and the application of in silico models for categorization and prioritization of data-poor ingredients for further screening. Based on the workflow developed in this study, 4 high priority, 18 medium priority, and 2 low priority substances were identified for further assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":"66 4","pages":"199-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/em.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of In Silico New Approach Methods for the Risk Assessment of Tattoo Ink Ingredients\",\"authors\":\"Prachi Pradeep,&nbsp;Stefanie Seifert,&nbsp;Ajay Vikram Singh,&nbsp;Peter Laux,&nbsp;Ralph Pirow\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/em.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Tattoo inks contain several substances, including organic and inorganic pigments, additives, and solvents, which may pose a health risk to not only the tattooed skin but also to other parts of the human body due to intradermal exposure. Substances in tattoo inks are regulated by entry 75 in Annex XVII of REACH Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006. However, despite these legal requirements, a well-defined criterion for the safety assessment of tattoo inks remains lacking. In this context, 2021 BfR opinion titled “Tattoo inks: minimum requirements and test methods” proposed a comprehensive risk assessment of pigments using in vitro/in-chemico data in accordance with OECD Guidelines and CLP Regulations. In the absence of experimental data, new approach methodologies (NAMs) may be used for data-gap filling. Therefore, this work evaluates the applicability of in silico NAMs for data-gap filling for a list of tattoo ink ingredients identified by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) and BfR for genotoxicity assessment. Experimental in vitro genotoxicity data were acquired from the International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) which makes non-confidential REACH Study Results publicly accessible. The specific aims of this analysis were the evaluation of in silico genotoxicity predictions from publicly available QSAR tools and structural alerts, the development and validation of new QSAR models specific to tattoo ink ingredients, and the application of in silico models for categorization and prioritization of data-poor ingredients for further screening. Based on the workflow developed in this study, 4 high priority, 18 medium priority, and 2 low priority substances were identified for further assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\"66 4\",\"pages\":\"199-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/em.70010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.70010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纹身油墨含有多种物质,包括有机和无机颜料、添加剂和溶剂,这些物质不仅会对纹身的皮肤造成健康风险,还会因皮内接触而对人体其他部位造成健康风险。纹身油墨中的物质受REACH法规(EC) No 1907/2006附件XVII第75条的监管。然而,尽管有这些法律要求,纹身油墨的安全评估仍然缺乏一个明确的标准。在此背景下,2021年BfR题为“纹身油墨:最低要求和测试方法”的意见根据经合组织指南和CLP法规,提出了使用体外/化学数据对颜料进行全面风险评估。在缺乏实验数据的情况下,可以使用新的方法方法(NAMs)来填补数据缺口。因此,本工作评估了由联合研究中心(JRC)和BfR确定的纹身油墨成分清单的数据缺口填充的硅NAMs的适用性,用于遗传毒性评估。实验体外遗传毒性数据来自国际统一化学信息数据库(IUCLID),这使得非机密的REACH研究结果可以公开获取。该分析的具体目的是评估来自公开可用的QSAR工具和结构警报的计算机遗传毒性预测,开发和验证针对纹身油墨成分的新QSAR模型,以及应用计算机模型对数据贫乏的成分进行分类和优先级排序,以便进一步筛选。根据本研究制定的工作流程,确定了4种高优先级、18种中等优先级和2种低优先级物质供进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability of In Silico New Approach Methods for the Risk Assessment of Tattoo Ink Ingredients

Tattoo inks contain several substances, including organic and inorganic pigments, additives, and solvents, which may pose a health risk to not only the tattooed skin but also to other parts of the human body due to intradermal exposure. Substances in tattoo inks are regulated by entry 75 in Annex XVII of REACH Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006. However, despite these legal requirements, a well-defined criterion for the safety assessment of tattoo inks remains lacking. In this context, 2021 BfR opinion titled “Tattoo inks: minimum requirements and test methods” proposed a comprehensive risk assessment of pigments using in vitro/in-chemico data in accordance with OECD Guidelines and CLP Regulations. In the absence of experimental data, new approach methodologies (NAMs) may be used for data-gap filling. Therefore, this work evaluates the applicability of in silico NAMs for data-gap filling for a list of tattoo ink ingredients identified by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) and BfR for genotoxicity assessment. Experimental in vitro genotoxicity data were acquired from the International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) which makes non-confidential REACH Study Results publicly accessible. The specific aims of this analysis were the evaluation of in silico genotoxicity predictions from publicly available QSAR tools and structural alerts, the development and validation of new QSAR models specific to tattoo ink ingredients, and the application of in silico models for categorization and prioritization of data-poor ingredients for further screening. Based on the workflow developed in this study, 4 high priority, 18 medium priority, and 2 low priority substances were identified for further assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis publishes original research manuscripts, reviews and commentaries on topics related to six general areas, with an emphasis on subject matter most suited for the readership of EMM as outlined below. The journal is intended for investigators in fields such as molecular biology, biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and epigenetics, genomics and epigenomics, cancer research, neurobiology, heritable mutation, radiation biology, toxicology, and molecular & environmental epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信