分解尘埃粒径的干沉积过程对模拟火星尘埃的影响

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Lulu Li, Chun Zhao, Claire E. Newman, Yongxuan Zhao, Jiawang Feng, Tao Li, Chengyun Yang, Yingxi Yue
{"title":"分解尘埃粒径的干沉积过程对模拟火星尘埃的影响","authors":"Lulu Li,&nbsp;Chun Zhao,&nbsp;Claire E. Newman,&nbsp;Yongxuan Zhao,&nbsp;Jiawang Feng,&nbsp;Tao Li,&nbsp;Chengyun Yang,&nbsp;Yingxi Yue","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mars, characterized as a “desert” planet with little water vapor, primarily relies on dry deposition for dust removal. Although these processes include gravitational sedimentation, turbulent transfer, Brownian diffusion, impaction, interception, and rebound, most current models consider only gravitational sedimentation. To have a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of Martian dust removal processes, a physics-based scheme of dry deposition processes with resolved dust particle sizes is implemented in the Mars Weather Research and Forecasting (MarsWRF) model. Results show that the size-resolved dry deposition scheme significantly increases the dry deposition velocity, with the maximum difference (over 0.024 m/s) occurring at 0.884 μm size bin. This enhanced removal efficiency leads to an increase of 0.4 μm in the effective radius of airborne dust throughout the year and a reduction of approximately 0.09 in dust opacity, particularly in the northern high latitudes during autumn and winter, compared to the simulation that only considers a size-resolved gravitational sedimentation scheme. The overestimation of low-level atmospheric temperature in the mid-to-low latitudes, excluding near-surface regions between <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>20</mn>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $20\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>60</mn>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $60\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>N, during <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mn>230</mn>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>250</mn>\n </mrow>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${L}_{s}=230-250\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (considered as peak-dust phase) is partially corrected, with a correction of up to 1 K compared to the single-particle size simulation and up to 5 K compared to the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation, bringing it closer to MCS observations. Additionally, the size-resolved dry deposition simulation reduces the condensation rate of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and the thickness of the northern CO<sub>2</sub> ice cap, aligning better with Viking Lander observations during northern winter and spring than the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of Dry Deposition Processes With Resolved Dust Particle Sizes on Simulating the Martian Dust\",\"authors\":\"Lulu Li,&nbsp;Chun Zhao,&nbsp;Claire E. Newman,&nbsp;Yongxuan Zhao,&nbsp;Jiawang Feng,&nbsp;Tao Li,&nbsp;Chengyun Yang,&nbsp;Yingxi Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JE008616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mars, characterized as a “desert” planet with little water vapor, primarily relies on dry deposition for dust removal. Although these processes include gravitational sedimentation, turbulent transfer, Brownian diffusion, impaction, interception, and rebound, most current models consider only gravitational sedimentation. To have a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of Martian dust removal processes, a physics-based scheme of dry deposition processes with resolved dust particle sizes is implemented in the Mars Weather Research and Forecasting (MarsWRF) model. Results show that the size-resolved dry deposition scheme significantly increases the dry deposition velocity, with the maximum difference (over 0.024 m/s) occurring at 0.884 μm size bin. This enhanced removal efficiency leads to an increase of 0.4 μm in the effective radius of airborne dust throughout the year and a reduction of approximately 0.09 in dust opacity, particularly in the northern high latitudes during autumn and winter, compared to the simulation that only considers a size-resolved gravitational sedimentation scheme. The overestimation of low-level atmospheric temperature in the mid-to-low latitudes, excluding near-surface regions between <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>20</mn>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $20\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>60</mn>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $60\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>N, during <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mi>s</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>230</mn>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>250</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${L}_{s}=230-250\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> (considered as peak-dust phase) is partially corrected, with a correction of up to 1 K compared to the single-particle size simulation and up to 5 K compared to the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation, bringing it closer to MCS observations. Additionally, the size-resolved dry deposition simulation reduces the condensation rate of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and the thickness of the northern CO<sub>2</sub> ice cap, aligning better with Viking Lander observations during northern winter and spring than the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008616\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

火星是一个“沙漠”行星,几乎没有水蒸气,主要依靠干沉积来清除灰尘。虽然这些过程包括重力沉降、湍流转移、布朗扩散、撞击、拦截和反弹,但目前大多数模型只考虑重力沉降。为了更全面地了解火星除尘过程的影响,在火星天气研究与预报(MarsWRF)模型中实施了一种基于物理的干沉积过程方案,该方案具有分解的尘埃粒径。结果表明:尺寸分辨干沉积方案显著提高了干沉积速度,在尺寸为0.884 μm的bin处差异最大,超过0.024 m/s;与仅考虑大小分辨重力沉降方案的模拟相比,这种增强的去除效率导致全年空气中粉尘有效半径增加0.4 μm,粉尘不透明度减少约0.09 μm,特别是在秋季和冬季的北部高纬度地区。在20°$20\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$ $和60°$60\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$ N之间的近地表区域,中低纬度低层大气温度的高估;在L s =230 ~ 250°期间${L}_{s}=230 ~ 250\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$(考虑为峰尘相位)被部分修正,与单颗粒大小模拟相比,校正高达1 K,与仅大小分辨的沉积模拟相比,校正高达5 K,使其更接近MCS观测结果。此外,尺寸分辨率的干沉积模拟降低了大气CO2的凝结速率和北部CO2冰盖的厚度,与海盗着陆器在北部冬季和春季的观测结果相比,尺寸分辨率的沉积模拟更符合观测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of Dry Deposition Processes With Resolved Dust Particle Sizes on Simulating the Martian Dust

Mars, characterized as a “desert” planet with little water vapor, primarily relies on dry deposition for dust removal. Although these processes include gravitational sedimentation, turbulent transfer, Brownian diffusion, impaction, interception, and rebound, most current models consider only gravitational sedimentation. To have a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of Martian dust removal processes, a physics-based scheme of dry deposition processes with resolved dust particle sizes is implemented in the Mars Weather Research and Forecasting (MarsWRF) model. Results show that the size-resolved dry deposition scheme significantly increases the dry deposition velocity, with the maximum difference (over 0.024 m/s) occurring at 0.884 μm size bin. This enhanced removal efficiency leads to an increase of 0.4 μm in the effective radius of airborne dust throughout the year and a reduction of approximately 0.09 in dust opacity, particularly in the northern high latitudes during autumn and winter, compared to the simulation that only considers a size-resolved gravitational sedimentation scheme. The overestimation of low-level atmospheric temperature in the mid-to-low latitudes, excluding near-surface regions between 20 ° $20\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$ and 60 ° $60\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$ N, during L s = 230 250 ° ${L}_{s}=230-250\mathit{{}^{\circ}}$ (considered as peak-dust phase) is partially corrected, with a correction of up to 1 K compared to the single-particle size simulation and up to 5 K compared to the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation, bringing it closer to MCS observations. Additionally, the size-resolved dry deposition simulation reduces the condensation rate of atmospheric CO2 and the thickness of the northern CO2 ice cap, aligning better with Viking Lander observations during northern winter and spring than the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信