Lulu Li, Chun Zhao, Claire E. Newman, Yongxuan Zhao, Jiawang Feng, Tao Li, Chengyun Yang, Yingxi Yue
{"title":"分解尘埃粒径的干沉积过程对模拟火星尘埃的影响","authors":"Lulu Li, Chun Zhao, Claire E. Newman, Yongxuan Zhao, Jiawang Feng, Tao Li, Chengyun Yang, Yingxi Yue","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mars, characterized as a “desert” planet with little water vapor, primarily relies on dry deposition for dust removal. Although these processes include gravitational sedimentation, turbulent transfer, Brownian diffusion, impaction, interception, and rebound, most current models consider only gravitational sedimentation. To have a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of Martian dust removal processes, a physics-based scheme of dry deposition processes with resolved dust particle sizes is implemented in the Mars Weather Research and Forecasting (MarsWRF) model. Results show that the size-resolved dry deposition scheme significantly increases the dry deposition velocity, with the maximum difference (over 0.024 m/s) occurring at 0.884 μm size bin. This enhanced removal efficiency leads to an increase of 0.4 μm in the effective radius of airborne dust throughout the year and a reduction of approximately 0.09 in dust opacity, particularly in the northern high latitudes during autumn and winter, compared to the simulation that only considers a size-resolved gravitational sedimentation scheme. The overestimation of low-level atmospheric temperature in the mid-to-low latitudes, excluding near-surface regions between <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>20</mn>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $20\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>60</mn>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $60\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>N, during <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mn>230</mn>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>250</mn>\n </mrow>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${L}_{s}=230-250\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (considered as peak-dust phase) is partially corrected, with a correction of up to 1 K compared to the single-particle size simulation and up to 5 K compared to the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation, bringing it closer to MCS observations. Additionally, the size-resolved dry deposition simulation reduces the condensation rate of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and the thickness of the northern CO<sub>2</sub> ice cap, aligning better with Viking Lander observations during northern winter and spring than the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of Dry Deposition Processes With Resolved Dust Particle Sizes on Simulating the Martian Dust\",\"authors\":\"Lulu Li, Chun Zhao, Claire E. Newman, Yongxuan Zhao, Jiawang Feng, Tao Li, Chengyun Yang, Yingxi Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JE008616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mars, characterized as a “desert” planet with little water vapor, primarily relies on dry deposition for dust removal. Although these processes include gravitational sedimentation, turbulent transfer, Brownian diffusion, impaction, interception, and rebound, most current models consider only gravitational sedimentation. To have a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of Martian dust removal processes, a physics-based scheme of dry deposition processes with resolved dust particle sizes is implemented in the Mars Weather Research and Forecasting (MarsWRF) model. Results show that the size-resolved dry deposition scheme significantly increases the dry deposition velocity, with the maximum difference (over 0.024 m/s) occurring at 0.884 μm size bin. This enhanced removal efficiency leads to an increase of 0.4 μm in the effective radius of airborne dust throughout the year and a reduction of approximately 0.09 in dust opacity, particularly in the northern high latitudes during autumn and winter, compared to the simulation that only considers a size-resolved gravitational sedimentation scheme. The overestimation of low-level atmospheric temperature in the mid-to-low latitudes, excluding near-surface regions between <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>20</mn>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $20\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>60</mn>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $60\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>N, during <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mi>s</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>230</mn>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>250</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${L}_{s}=230-250\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> (considered as peak-dust phase) is partially corrected, with a correction of up to 1 K compared to the single-particle size simulation and up to 5 K compared to the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation, bringing it closer to MCS observations. Additionally, the size-resolved dry deposition simulation reduces the condensation rate of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and the thickness of the northern CO<sub>2</sub> ice cap, aligning better with Viking Lander observations during northern winter and spring than the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008616\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impacts of Dry Deposition Processes With Resolved Dust Particle Sizes on Simulating the Martian Dust
Mars, characterized as a “desert” planet with little water vapor, primarily relies on dry deposition for dust removal. Although these processes include gravitational sedimentation, turbulent transfer, Brownian diffusion, impaction, interception, and rebound, most current models consider only gravitational sedimentation. To have a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of Martian dust removal processes, a physics-based scheme of dry deposition processes with resolved dust particle sizes is implemented in the Mars Weather Research and Forecasting (MarsWRF) model. Results show that the size-resolved dry deposition scheme significantly increases the dry deposition velocity, with the maximum difference (over 0.024 m/s) occurring at 0.884 μm size bin. This enhanced removal efficiency leads to an increase of 0.4 μm in the effective radius of airborne dust throughout the year and a reduction of approximately 0.09 in dust opacity, particularly in the northern high latitudes during autumn and winter, compared to the simulation that only considers a size-resolved gravitational sedimentation scheme. The overestimation of low-level atmospheric temperature in the mid-to-low latitudes, excluding near-surface regions between and N, during (considered as peak-dust phase) is partially corrected, with a correction of up to 1 K compared to the single-particle size simulation and up to 5 K compared to the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation, bringing it closer to MCS observations. Additionally, the size-resolved dry deposition simulation reduces the condensation rate of atmospheric CO2 and the thickness of the northern CO2 ice cap, aligning better with Viking Lander observations during northern winter and spring than the size-resolved sedimentation-only simulation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.