沙特大学接纳智障学生:理解理论与实践之间的差距

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Khalid M. Abu-Alghayth, Basmah F. Alshahrani
{"title":"沙特大学接纳智障学生:理解理论与实践之间的差距","authors":"Khalid M. Abu-Alghayth,&nbsp;Basmah F. Alshahrani","doi":"10.1111/bld.12633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The global discourse on higher education underscores its pivotal role in personal development, societal progress and economic prosperity. However, actual implementation and practices within universities have not kept pace, and students with intellectual disability still struggle, as their journey towards accessing and succeeding in higher education is marked by intricate challenges. Therefore, this study investigated the gap between theory and practice in Saudi universities, obtaining an in-depth understanding of the inclusion of students with intellectual disability in universities, current challenges and factors perceived as critical for enhancing these students' enrolment and success.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We employed a basic interpretive qualitative approach to gain insight into the perceptions of 12 faculty members and four staff members via a series of initial and follow-up semistructured interviews and focus group. In addition, we analysed a set of relevant documents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The findings highlight the following themes: admission process and entry requirements, implementation gaps in educational policies, nondisclosure of disability, accessibility and support, and critical factors for successful inclusion; several subthemes also emerged.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study underscores the complex dynamics between policy and practice, revealing significant gaps that need to be addressed to ensure genuine inclusivity. Based on the findings, we discuss future directions in terms of research and practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47232,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"53 2","pages":"283-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusion of Students With Intellectual Disability in Saudi Universities: Understanding the Gap Between Theory and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Khalid M. Abu-Alghayth,&nbsp;Basmah F. Alshahrani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bld.12633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The global discourse on higher education underscores its pivotal role in personal development, societal progress and economic prosperity. However, actual implementation and practices within universities have not kept pace, and students with intellectual disability still struggle, as their journey towards accessing and succeeding in higher education is marked by intricate challenges. Therefore, this study investigated the gap between theory and practice in Saudi universities, obtaining an in-depth understanding of the inclusion of students with intellectual disability in universities, current challenges and factors perceived as critical for enhancing these students' enrolment and success.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We employed a basic interpretive qualitative approach to gain insight into the perceptions of 12 faculty members and four staff members via a series of initial and follow-up semistructured interviews and focus group. In addition, we analysed a set of relevant documents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings highlight the following themes: admission process and entry requirements, implementation gaps in educational policies, nondisclosure of disability, accessibility and support, and critical factors for successful inclusion; several subthemes also emerged.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study underscores the complex dynamics between policy and practice, revealing significant gaps that need to be addressed to ensure genuine inclusivity. Based on the findings, we discuss future directions in terms of research and practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"283-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12633\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球关于高等教育的讨论强调了高等教育在个人发展、社会进步和经济繁荣中的关键作用。然而,大学内部的实际实施和实践并没有跟上步伐,智障学生仍然在挣扎,因为他们进入高等教育并取得成功的道路上充满了复杂的挑战。因此,本研究调查了沙特大学理论与实践之间的差距,深入了解了智力残疾学生在大学中的融入情况、当前的挑战以及被认为对提高这些学生的入学率和成功至关重要的因素。方法采用基本的解释性定性方法,通过一系列的初始和后续半结构化访谈和焦点小组,深入了解12名教师和4名工作人员的看法。此外,我们还分析了一组相关文件。调查结果强调了以下主题:入学流程和入学要求,教育政策的实施差距,残疾的保密,可及性和支持,以及成功融入的关键因素;还出现了几个次级主题。本研究强调了政策与实践之间的复杂动态关系,揭示了需要解决的重大差距,以确保真正的包容性。在此基础上,讨论了未来的研究和实践方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inclusion of Students With Intellectual Disability in Saudi Universities: Understanding the Gap Between Theory and Practice

Background

The global discourse on higher education underscores its pivotal role in personal development, societal progress and economic prosperity. However, actual implementation and practices within universities have not kept pace, and students with intellectual disability still struggle, as their journey towards accessing and succeeding in higher education is marked by intricate challenges. Therefore, this study investigated the gap between theory and practice in Saudi universities, obtaining an in-depth understanding of the inclusion of students with intellectual disability in universities, current challenges and factors perceived as critical for enhancing these students' enrolment and success.

Methods

We employed a basic interpretive qualitative approach to gain insight into the perceptions of 12 faculty members and four staff members via a series of initial and follow-up semistructured interviews and focus group. In addition, we analysed a set of relevant documents.

Findings

The findings highlight the following themes: admission process and entry requirements, implementation gaps in educational policies, nondisclosure of disability, accessibility and support, and critical factors for successful inclusion; several subthemes also emerged.

Conclusions

This study underscores the complex dynamics between policy and practice, revealing significant gaps that need to be addressed to ensure genuine inclusivity. Based on the findings, we discuss future directions in terms of research and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Learning Disabilities is an interdisciplinary international peer-reviewed journal which aims to be the leading journal in the learning disability field. It is the official Journal of the British Institute of Learning Disabilities. It encompasses contemporary debate/s and developments in research, policy and practice that are relevant to the field of learning disabilities. It publishes original refereed papers, regular special issues giving comprehensive coverage to specific subject areas, and especially commissioned keynote reviews on major topics. In addition, there are reviews of books and training materials, and a letters section. The focus of the journal is on practical issues, with current debates and research reports. Topics covered could include, but not be limited to: Current trends in residential and day-care service Inclusion, rehabilitation and quality of life Education and training Historical and inclusive pieces [particularly welcomed are those co-written with people with learning disabilities] Therapies Mental health issues Employment and occupation Recreation and leisure; Ethical issues, advocacy and rights Family and carers Health issues Adoption and fostering Causation and management of specific syndromes Staff training New technology Policy critique and impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信