{"title":"沙特大学接纳智障学生:理解理论与实践之间的差距","authors":"Khalid M. Abu-Alghayth, Basmah F. Alshahrani","doi":"10.1111/bld.12633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The global discourse on higher education underscores its pivotal role in personal development, societal progress and economic prosperity. However, actual implementation and practices within universities have not kept pace, and students with intellectual disability still struggle, as their journey towards accessing and succeeding in higher education is marked by intricate challenges. Therefore, this study investigated the gap between theory and practice in Saudi universities, obtaining an in-depth understanding of the inclusion of students with intellectual disability in universities, current challenges and factors perceived as critical for enhancing these students' enrolment and success.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We employed a basic interpretive qualitative approach to gain insight into the perceptions of 12 faculty members and four staff members via a series of initial and follow-up semistructured interviews and focus group. In addition, we analysed a set of relevant documents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The findings highlight the following themes: admission process and entry requirements, implementation gaps in educational policies, nondisclosure of disability, accessibility and support, and critical factors for successful inclusion; several subthemes also emerged.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study underscores the complex dynamics between policy and practice, revealing significant gaps that need to be addressed to ensure genuine inclusivity. Based on the findings, we discuss future directions in terms of research and practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47232,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"53 2","pages":"283-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusion of Students With Intellectual Disability in Saudi Universities: Understanding the Gap Between Theory and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Khalid M. Abu-Alghayth, Basmah F. Alshahrani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bld.12633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The global discourse on higher education underscores its pivotal role in personal development, societal progress and economic prosperity. However, actual implementation and practices within universities have not kept pace, and students with intellectual disability still struggle, as their journey towards accessing and succeeding in higher education is marked by intricate challenges. Therefore, this study investigated the gap between theory and practice in Saudi universities, obtaining an in-depth understanding of the inclusion of students with intellectual disability in universities, current challenges and factors perceived as critical for enhancing these students' enrolment and success.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We employed a basic interpretive qualitative approach to gain insight into the perceptions of 12 faculty members and four staff members via a series of initial and follow-up semistructured interviews and focus group. In addition, we analysed a set of relevant documents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings highlight the following themes: admission process and entry requirements, implementation gaps in educational policies, nondisclosure of disability, accessibility and support, and critical factors for successful inclusion; several subthemes also emerged.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study underscores the complex dynamics between policy and practice, revealing significant gaps that need to be addressed to ensure genuine inclusivity. Based on the findings, we discuss future directions in terms of research and practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"283-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12633\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inclusion of Students With Intellectual Disability in Saudi Universities: Understanding the Gap Between Theory and Practice
Background
The global discourse on higher education underscores its pivotal role in personal development, societal progress and economic prosperity. However, actual implementation and practices within universities have not kept pace, and students with intellectual disability still struggle, as their journey towards accessing and succeeding in higher education is marked by intricate challenges. Therefore, this study investigated the gap between theory and practice in Saudi universities, obtaining an in-depth understanding of the inclusion of students with intellectual disability in universities, current challenges and factors perceived as critical for enhancing these students' enrolment and success.
Methods
We employed a basic interpretive qualitative approach to gain insight into the perceptions of 12 faculty members and four staff members via a series of initial and follow-up semistructured interviews and focus group. In addition, we analysed a set of relevant documents.
Findings
The findings highlight the following themes: admission process and entry requirements, implementation gaps in educational policies, nondisclosure of disability, accessibility and support, and critical factors for successful inclusion; several subthemes also emerged.
Conclusions
This study underscores the complex dynamics between policy and practice, revealing significant gaps that need to be addressed to ensure genuine inclusivity. Based on the findings, we discuss future directions in terms of research and practice.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Learning Disabilities is an interdisciplinary international peer-reviewed journal which aims to be the leading journal in the learning disability field. It is the official Journal of the British Institute of Learning Disabilities. It encompasses contemporary debate/s and developments in research, policy and practice that are relevant to the field of learning disabilities. It publishes original refereed papers, regular special issues giving comprehensive coverage to specific subject areas, and especially commissioned keynote reviews on major topics. In addition, there are reviews of books and training materials, and a letters section. The focus of the journal is on practical issues, with current debates and research reports. Topics covered could include, but not be limited to: Current trends in residential and day-care service Inclusion, rehabilitation and quality of life Education and training Historical and inclusive pieces [particularly welcomed are those co-written with people with learning disabilities] Therapies Mental health issues Employment and occupation Recreation and leisure; Ethical issues, advocacy and rights Family and carers Health issues Adoption and fostering Causation and management of specific syndromes Staff training New technology Policy critique and impact.