{"title":"对“地下水位以上非饱和带全氟辛烷磺酸滞留量建模与评价”的修正","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/gwmr.12697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hort, H.M., E.B. Stockwell, C.J. Newell, J. Scalia IV, and S. Panday. 2024. Modeling and evaluation of PFOS retention in the unsaturated zone above the water table. <i>Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation</i> 44: 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12662</p><p>In page 3 of the “<i>Based on Newell et al. (2020), a retardation factor of 6.0 (at density = 2.6 g/cm<sup>3</sup> and solid-liquid partition coefficient = 0.077 L/kg) was employed to account for PFOS sorption to the sand</i>.”, retardation factor of 6.0 was not implemented here but instead, we used retardation factor of 2.0 in saturated zone. The text should appear as follows:</p><p>“<i>Saturated zone retardation factor of 2.0 was used in the model to account for PFOS hydrophobic sorption. In unsaturated soils the retardation factor varies depending on the soil moisture</i>.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":55081,"journal":{"name":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwmr.12697","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to “Modeling and Evaluation of PFOS Retention in the Unsaturated Zone above the Water Table”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwmr.12697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hort, H.M., E.B. Stockwell, C.J. Newell, J. Scalia IV, and S. Panday. 2024. Modeling and evaluation of PFOS retention in the unsaturated zone above the water table. <i>Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation</i> 44: 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12662</p><p>In page 3 of the “<i>Based on Newell et al. (2020), a retardation factor of 6.0 (at density = 2.6 g/cm<sup>3</sup> and solid-liquid partition coefficient = 0.077 L/kg) was employed to account for PFOS sorption to the sand</i>.”, retardation factor of 6.0 was not implemented here but instead, we used retardation factor of 2.0 in saturated zone. The text should appear as follows:</p><p>“<i>Saturated zone retardation factor of 2.0 was used in the model to account for PFOS hydrophobic sorption. In unsaturated soils the retardation factor varies depending on the soil moisture</i>.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwmr.12697\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12697\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
霍特，h.m.， E.B.斯托克韦尔，C.J.纽维尔，J.斯卡利亚四世和S.潘迪。2024。全氟辛烷磺酸在地下水位以上非饱和带中的滞留建模与评价。地下水监测；补救44:38-48。根据Newell et al.(2020)，采用延迟因子6.0（密度= 2.6 g/cm3，固液分配系数= 0.077 L/kg）来考虑全氟辛烷磺酸对沙子的吸附。，这里没有实现6.0的阻滞因子，而是在饱和区使用2.0的阻滞因子。文本应如下所示：“模型中使用2.0的饱和区延迟因子来考虑全氟辛烷磺酸疏水吸附。在非饱和土壤中，阻滞因子随土壤湿度的变化而变化。我们为这个错误道歉。
Correction to “Modeling and Evaluation of PFOS Retention in the Unsaturated Zone above the Water Table”
Hort, H.M., E.B. Stockwell, C.J. Newell, J. Scalia IV, and S. Panday. 2024. Modeling and evaluation of PFOS retention in the unsaturated zone above the water table. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation 44: 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12662
In page 3 of the “Based on Newell et al. (2020), a retardation factor of 6.0 (at density = 2.6 g/cm3 and solid-liquid partition coefficient = 0.077 L/kg) was employed to account for PFOS sorption to the sand.”, retardation factor of 6.0 was not implemented here but instead, we used retardation factor of 2.0 in saturated zone. The text should appear as follows:
“Saturated zone retardation factor of 2.0 was used in the model to account for PFOS hydrophobic sorption. In unsaturated soils the retardation factor varies depending on the soil moisture.”
期刊介绍：
Since its inception in 1981, Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation® has been a resource for researchers and practitioners in the field. It is a quarterly journal that offers the best in application oriented, peer-reviewed papers together with insightful articles from the practitioner''s perspective. Each issue features papers containing cutting-edge information on treatment technology, columns by industry experts, news briefs, and equipment news. GWMR plays a unique role in advancing the practice of the groundwater monitoring and remediation field by providing forward-thinking research with practical solutions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
