两种二胺衍生宿主化合物在环己酮和异构体甲基环己酮中的行为

IF 2.6 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CrystEngComm Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1039/D5CE00298B
Danica B. Trollip, Benita Barton, Mino R. Caira and Eric C. Hosten
{"title":"两种二胺衍生宿主化合物在环己酮和异构体甲基环己酮中的行为","authors":"Danica B. Trollip, Benita Barton, Mino R. Caira and Eric C. Hosten","doi":"10.1039/D5CE00298B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The present investigation centred around the host ability of two novel compounds, <em>N</em>,<em>N</em>′-bis(5-phenyl-5-dibenzo[<em>a</em>,<em>d</em>]cycloheptenyl)propane-1,3-diamine (<strong>DB3</strong>) and <em>N</em>,<em>N</em>′-bis(9-phenyl-9-thioxanthenyl)butane-1,4-diamine (<strong>S4</strong>), for guest solvents cyclohexanone and its methylcyclohexanone isomers (Cyc, 2MeCyc, 3MeCyc and 4MeCyc). While <strong>DB3</strong> formed complexes with each of these organic solvents, <strong>S4</strong> only included 4MeCyc. All complexes were characterized by 1 : 1 host : guest ratios. With the view to assessing whether these host compounds have the potential to separate mixtures of the cyclohexanones, each one was crystallized from various guest mixtures. It was determined that such separations would not be feasible through supramolecular chemistry strategies with these two host species owing to low calculated selectivity coefficients (<em>K</em>). This was despite the observed selectivity of <strong>DB3</strong> for 4MeCYC and Cyc in the mixed guest experiments. However, a thorough scrutiny of the five novel complexes was subsequently undertaken, and the crystal structures, through SCXRD analysis, demonstrated that Cyc, a preferred guest solvent, when included by <strong>DB3</strong>, occupied highly constricted channels, while these were comparatively wider and more open in the complexes with the MeCycs. Furthermore, preferred Cyc was the only guest molecule that engaged in a classical hydrogen bond with <strong>DB3</strong>, and Hirshfeld surface analyses showed this guest (which only has 10 hydrogen atoms) to be involved in the greater quantity of (guest)H⋯H(host) interactions (the MeCyc molecules have 12 hydrogen atoms and experienced less of this type of interaction). All of these observations provide an explanation for the affinity of <strong>DB3</strong> for Cyc (but not for 4MeCyc). These SCXRD analyses further demonstrated that the geometry of the diamino linker in the <strong>DB3</strong> complexes was more folded in nature while, in <strong>S4</strong>·4MeCyc, this was in an extended zig-zag orientation. Finally, thermal analyses on each of the complexes, unsurprisingly, demonstrated the Cyc-containing complex with <strong>DB3</strong> to be the most stable one.</p>","PeriodicalId":70,"journal":{"name":"CrystEngComm","volume":" 20","pages":" 3279-3294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/ce/d5ce00298b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The behaviour of two diamino-derived host compounds in cyclohexanone and isomeric methylcyclohexanones†\",\"authors\":\"Danica B. Trollip, Benita Barton, Mino R. Caira and Eric C. Hosten\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5CE00298B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The present investigation centred around the host ability of two novel compounds, <em>N</em>,<em>N</em>′-bis(5-phenyl-5-dibenzo[<em>a</em>,<em>d</em>]cycloheptenyl)propane-1,3-diamine (<strong>DB3</strong>) and <em>N</em>,<em>N</em>′-bis(9-phenyl-9-thioxanthenyl)butane-1,4-diamine (<strong>S4</strong>), for guest solvents cyclohexanone and its methylcyclohexanone isomers (Cyc, 2MeCyc, 3MeCyc and 4MeCyc). While <strong>DB3</strong> formed complexes with each of these organic solvents, <strong>S4</strong> only included 4MeCyc. All complexes were characterized by 1 : 1 host : guest ratios. With the view to assessing whether these host compounds have the potential to separate mixtures of the cyclohexanones, each one was crystallized from various guest mixtures. It was determined that such separations would not be feasible through supramolecular chemistry strategies with these two host species owing to low calculated selectivity coefficients (<em>K</em>). This was despite the observed selectivity of <strong>DB3</strong> for 4MeCYC and Cyc in the mixed guest experiments. However, a thorough scrutiny of the five novel complexes was subsequently undertaken, and the crystal structures, through SCXRD analysis, demonstrated that Cyc, a preferred guest solvent, when included by <strong>DB3</strong>, occupied highly constricted channels, while these were comparatively wider and more open in the complexes with the MeCycs. Furthermore, preferred Cyc was the only guest molecule that engaged in a classical hydrogen bond with <strong>DB3</strong>, and Hirshfeld surface analyses showed this guest (which only has 10 hydrogen atoms) to be involved in the greater quantity of (guest)H⋯H(host) interactions (the MeCyc molecules have 12 hydrogen atoms and experienced less of this type of interaction). All of these observations provide an explanation for the affinity of <strong>DB3</strong> for Cyc (but not for 4MeCyc). These SCXRD analyses further demonstrated that the geometry of the diamino linker in the <strong>DB3</strong> complexes was more folded in nature while, in <strong>S4</strong>·4MeCyc, this was in an extended zig-zag orientation. Finally, thermal analyses on each of the complexes, unsurprisingly, demonstrated the Cyc-containing complex with <strong>DB3</strong> to be the most stable one.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":70,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CrystEngComm\",\"volume\":\" 20\",\"pages\":\" 3279-3294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/ce/d5ce00298b?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CrystEngComm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ce/d5ce00298b\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CrystEngComm","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ce/d5ce00298b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究主要围绕两种新化合物N,N ' -二(5-苯基-5-二苯并[a,d]环庚烯基)丙烷-1,3-二胺(DB3)和N,N ' -二(9-苯基-9-硫代蒽基)丁烷-1,4-二胺(S4)对客溶剂环己酮及其甲基环己酮异构体(Cyc, 2MeCyc, 3MeCyc和4MeCyc)的宿主能力展开。DB3与这些有机溶剂形成络合物,而S4只包含4MeCyc。所有配合物的特征都是1:1的主客比。为了评估这些宿主化合物是否具有分离环己酮混合物的潜力,每种化合物都从各种客体混合物中结晶。结果表明,由于这两种寄主的计算选择性系数(K)较低,通过超分子化学策略进行分离是不可行的。尽管在混合客体实验中观察到DB3对4MeCYC和Cyc的选择性。然而,随后对这五种新型配合物进行了彻底的审查,通过SCXRD分析,晶体结构表明,当DB3包含Cyc时,首选客体溶剂Cyc占据了高度狭窄的通道,而在与MeCycs配合物中,这些通道相对更宽,更开放。此外,优选Cyc是唯一与DB3发生经典氢键的客体分子,Hirshfeld表面分析表明,这种客体(只有10个氢原子)参与了更多的(客体)H⋯H(宿主)相互作用(MeCyc分子有12个氢原子,经历的这种类型的相互作用较少)。所有这些观察结果都解释了DB3对Cyc的亲和力(而不是对4MeCyc的亲和力)。这些SCXRD分析进一步表明,DB3配合物中的二氨基连接物的几何形状在本质上是折叠的,而在S4·4MeCyc中,这是一个扩展的锯齿形取向。最后,对每个配合物进行热分析,不出所料,表明含有cyc的DB3配合物是最稳定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The behaviour of two diamino-derived host compounds in cyclohexanone and isomeric methylcyclohexanones†

The present investigation centred around the host ability of two novel compounds, N,N′-bis(5-phenyl-5-dibenzo[a,d]cycloheptenyl)propane-1,3-diamine (DB3) and N,N′-bis(9-phenyl-9-thioxanthenyl)butane-1,4-diamine (S4), for guest solvents cyclohexanone and its methylcyclohexanone isomers (Cyc, 2MeCyc, 3MeCyc and 4MeCyc). While DB3 formed complexes with each of these organic solvents, S4 only included 4MeCyc. All complexes were characterized by 1 : 1 host : guest ratios. With the view to assessing whether these host compounds have the potential to separate mixtures of the cyclohexanones, each one was crystallized from various guest mixtures. It was determined that such separations would not be feasible through supramolecular chemistry strategies with these two host species owing to low calculated selectivity coefficients (K). This was despite the observed selectivity of DB3 for 4MeCYC and Cyc in the mixed guest experiments. However, a thorough scrutiny of the five novel complexes was subsequently undertaken, and the crystal structures, through SCXRD analysis, demonstrated that Cyc, a preferred guest solvent, when included by DB3, occupied highly constricted channels, while these were comparatively wider and more open in the complexes with the MeCycs. Furthermore, preferred Cyc was the only guest molecule that engaged in a classical hydrogen bond with DB3, and Hirshfeld surface analyses showed this guest (which only has 10 hydrogen atoms) to be involved in the greater quantity of (guest)H⋯H(host) interactions (the MeCyc molecules have 12 hydrogen atoms and experienced less of this type of interaction). All of these observations provide an explanation for the affinity of DB3 for Cyc (but not for 4MeCyc). These SCXRD analyses further demonstrated that the geometry of the diamino linker in the DB3 complexes was more folded in nature while, in S4·4MeCyc, this was in an extended zig-zag orientation. Finally, thermal analyses on each of the complexes, unsurprisingly, demonstrated the Cyc-containing complex with DB3 to be the most stable one.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CrystEngComm
CrystEngComm 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
747
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Design and understanding of solid-state and crystalline materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信