Javier Arroyo-Caire , Edgar S. Duran-Uribe , Mayra Anabel Lara-Angulo , Manuel Antonio Diaz-Perez , Antonio Sepúlveda-Escribano , Juan Carlos Serrano-Ruiz
{"title":"高效的CeO2和CeO2 - al2o3载体Ru作为第三代氨合成催化剂:比商业Ru/CeO2†增强的动力学机制","authors":"Javier Arroyo-Caire , Edgar S. Duran-Uribe , Mayra Anabel Lara-Angulo , Manuel Antonio Diaz-Perez , Antonio Sepúlveda-Escribano , Juan Carlos Serrano-Ruiz","doi":"10.1039/d5cy00122f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ceria (CeO<sub>2</sub>) has been previously reported as a functional support for ruthenium (Ru) as an ammonia synthesis catalyst. However, lab-synthesized ceria materials usually present low surface areas, thereby limiting the generation of oxygen vacancies and the ammonia synthesis activity as a result of weak metal–support interactions. With the aim of overcoming this issue, we prepared, by a simple impregnation method, high surface area ceria and ceria–alumina supported Ru catalysts with improved ammonia synthesis performance at moderate temperatures. In this sense, lab-synthesized Ru/CeO<sub>2</sub> (with higher specific surface area and lower crystallinity than commercial ceria) showed stronger metal–support interactions than the commercial sample, which resulted in a superior global ammonia synthesis kinetic mechanism with more positive hydrogen reaction orders (<em>i.e.</em>, more resistant to hydrogen inhibition) and significantly lower activation energies (46 <em>vs.</em> 61 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>). We found that the use of alumina as a structural support increased the surface area of ceria, thereby promoting the Ru–CeO<sub>2</sub> interaction and the catalytic performance. We analyzed the effect of the surface chemistry of two different commercial aluminas (acidic and basic) with similar surface areas. Basic alumina was found to increase the specific surface area of the catalyst to a larger extent as compared to acidic alumina. Thus, the Ru/CeO<sub>2</sub>–Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalyst with 50 wt% of basic alumina showed an ammonia synthesis activity of 1.9 mmol g<sup>−1</sup> h <sup>−1</sup> at 400 °C and ambient pressure and an activation energy as low as 44.8 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":66,"journal":{"name":"Catalysis Science & Technology","volume":"15 10","pages":"Pages 2988-2998"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient CeO2 and CeO2–Al2O3 supports for Ru as 3rd generation ammonia synthesis catalysts: enhanced kinetic mechanism over commercial Ru/CeO2†\",\"authors\":\"Javier Arroyo-Caire , Edgar S. Duran-Uribe , Mayra Anabel Lara-Angulo , Manuel Antonio Diaz-Perez , Antonio Sepúlveda-Escribano , Juan Carlos Serrano-Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d5cy00122f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ceria (CeO<sub>2</sub>) has been previously reported as a functional support for ruthenium (Ru) as an ammonia synthesis catalyst. However, lab-synthesized ceria materials usually present low surface areas, thereby limiting the generation of oxygen vacancies and the ammonia synthesis activity as a result of weak metal–support interactions. With the aim of overcoming this issue, we prepared, by a simple impregnation method, high surface area ceria and ceria–alumina supported Ru catalysts with improved ammonia synthesis performance at moderate temperatures. In this sense, lab-synthesized Ru/CeO<sub>2</sub> (with higher specific surface area and lower crystallinity than commercial ceria) showed stronger metal–support interactions than the commercial sample, which resulted in a superior global ammonia synthesis kinetic mechanism with more positive hydrogen reaction orders (<em>i.e.</em>, more resistant to hydrogen inhibition) and significantly lower activation energies (46 <em>vs.</em> 61 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>). We found that the use of alumina as a structural support increased the surface area of ceria, thereby promoting the Ru–CeO<sub>2</sub> interaction and the catalytic performance. We analyzed the effect of the surface chemistry of two different commercial aluminas (acidic and basic) with similar surface areas. Basic alumina was found to increase the specific surface area of the catalyst to a larger extent as compared to acidic alumina. Thus, the Ru/CeO<sub>2</sub>–Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalyst with 50 wt% of basic alumina showed an ammonia synthesis activity of 1.9 mmol g<sup>−1</sup> h <sup>−1</sup> at 400 °C and ambient pressure and an activation energy as low as 44.8 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":66,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catalysis Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2988-2998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catalysis Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2044475325001601\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysis Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2044475325001601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficient CeO2 and CeO2–Al2O3 supports for Ru as 3rd generation ammonia synthesis catalysts: enhanced kinetic mechanism over commercial Ru/CeO2†
Ceria (CeO2) has been previously reported as a functional support for ruthenium (Ru) as an ammonia synthesis catalyst. However, lab-synthesized ceria materials usually present low surface areas, thereby limiting the generation of oxygen vacancies and the ammonia synthesis activity as a result of weak metal–support interactions. With the aim of overcoming this issue, we prepared, by a simple impregnation method, high surface area ceria and ceria–alumina supported Ru catalysts with improved ammonia synthesis performance at moderate temperatures. In this sense, lab-synthesized Ru/CeO2 (with higher specific surface area and lower crystallinity than commercial ceria) showed stronger metal–support interactions than the commercial sample, which resulted in a superior global ammonia synthesis kinetic mechanism with more positive hydrogen reaction orders (i.e., more resistant to hydrogen inhibition) and significantly lower activation energies (46 vs. 61 kJ mol−1). We found that the use of alumina as a structural support increased the surface area of ceria, thereby promoting the Ru–CeO2 interaction and the catalytic performance. We analyzed the effect of the surface chemistry of two different commercial aluminas (acidic and basic) with similar surface areas. Basic alumina was found to increase the specific surface area of the catalyst to a larger extent as compared to acidic alumina. Thus, the Ru/CeO2–Al2O3 catalyst with 50 wt% of basic alumina showed an ammonia synthesis activity of 1.9 mmol g−1 h −1 at 400 °C and ambient pressure and an activation energy as low as 44.8 kJ mol−1.
期刊介绍:
A multidisciplinary journal focusing on cutting edge research across all fundamental science and technological aspects of catalysis.
Editor-in-chief: Bert Weckhuysen
Impact factor: 5.0
Time to first decision (peer reviewed only): 31 days