Differences between facilities in horse welfare profiles: slight differences in management/working conditions may be enough

Many studies focus on animal welfare in terms of specific, either behavioural or physiological, indicators or on the impact of a particular management factor. However, an animal’s welfare state results from the individual’s perception of its general environment, which has consequences at both behavioural and physiological levels. Previous research on horses has shown that different riding schools could be characterised by different emotional/cognitive profiles of horses, in relation sometimes with one single management factor. In the present study, we aimed at determining if such facility-specific horse profiles could also be found in terms of welfare, i.e. facility-specific “welfare profiles”, using a multifaceted approach where animals’ welfare state was assessed based on detailed behavioural, health and physiological measurements. A total of 59 horses from three different riding schools, with a very similar global conventional management but differed slightly in terms of turn-out frequency and riding techniques were studied. A principal component analysis and statistical comparisons showed that, despite the close similarity in management between the three sites, the horses’ welfare state was very different and specific to each structure. Thus, this study using behavioural, health and physiological measures, highlights the existence of facility horse welfare profiles and reveals that even apparently minor differences in management practices could have a major impact on the horses’ welfare state. The quality of ridden work, which is often not taken into account in studies on horse welfare, could be a major issue.