论科学与设计的共同核心

IF 3.2 1区工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING

Design Studies Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.destud.2025.101305

Hans Georg Schaathun

{"title":"论科学与设计的共同核心","authors":"Hans Georg Schaathun","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2025.101305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relationship between science and design is complicated and controversial. Over the years we have seen both authors trying to cast design as a science, and authors who aim to demarcate design firmly from science. In 2012, Farrell and Hooker argued that science is essentially a form of design. Later, in 2015, they moderated this view, and argued for a Common Core Cognitive Process underlying both science and design. This paper argues that such a Common Core should be designed and promoted in order to facilitate inter-disciplinary conversation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50593,"journal":{"name":"Design Studies","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 101305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the common core of science and design\",\"authors\":\"Hans Georg Schaathun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.destud.2025.101305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The relationship between science and design is complicated and controversial. Over the years we have seen both authors trying to cast design as a science, and authors who aim to demarcate design firmly from science. In 2012, Farrell and Hooker argued that science is essentially a form of design. Later, in 2015, they moderated this view, and argued for a Common Core Cognitive Process underlying both science and design. This paper argues that such a Common Core should be designed and promoted in order to facilitate inter-disciplinary conversation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Studies\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X25000171\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Studies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X25000171","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

科学与设计之间的关系是复杂而有争议的。多年来，我们看到两位作者都试图将设计视为一门科学，也看到两位作者的目标是将设计与科学牢牢划清界限。2012年，法雷尔和胡克认为，科学本质上是一种设计形式。后来，在2015年，他们缓和了这一观点，并主张科学和设计背后都有一个共同的核心认知过程。本文认为，应该设计和促进这样一个共同核心，以促进跨学科的对话。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

On the common core of science and design

The relationship between science and design is complicated and controversial. Over the years we have seen both authors trying to cast design as a science, and authors who aim to demarcate design firmly from science. In 2012, Farrell and Hooker argued that science is essentially a form of design. Later, in 2015, they moderated this view, and argued for a Common Core Cognitive Process underlying both science and design. This paper argues that such a Common Core should be designed and promoted in order to facilitate inter-disciplinary conversation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Design Studies 工程技术-工程：制造

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

20.00%

发文量

审稿时长

40 days

期刊介绍： Design Studies is a leading international academic journal focused on developing understanding of design processes. It studies design activity across all domains of application, including engineering and product design, architectural and urban design, computer artefacts and systems design. It therefore provides an interdisciplinary forum for the analysis, development and discussion of fundamental aspects of design activity, from cognition and methodology to values and philosophy. Design Studies publishes work that is concerned with the process of designing, and is relevant to a broad audience of researchers, teachers and practitioners. We welcome original, scientific and scholarly research papers reporting studies concerned with the process of designing in all its many fields, or furthering the development and application of new knowledge relating to design process. Papers should be written to be intelligible and pertinent to a wide range of readership across different design domains. To be relevant for this journal, a paper has to offer something that gives new insight into or knowledge about the design process, or assists new development of the processes of designing.