儿童虐待的种族、民族和性别差异:美国发病率的州级分析

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Rebecca L. Fix , Amanda Luken , Reshmi Nair , Spencer T. Fix
{"title":"儿童虐待的种族、民族和性别差异:美国发病率的州级分析","authors":"Rebecca L. Fix ,&nbsp;Amanda Luken ,&nbsp;Reshmi Nair ,&nbsp;Spencer T. Fix","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The scope of the problem of child maltreatment warrants more nuanced epidemiologic investigation. Our study examined state-level rates of child maltreatment (i.e., child physical abuse, child sexual abuse, neglect) by race, ethnicity, and gender. We used 3,972,565 million cases of child physical and sexual abuse and neglect from the 2018 U.S. National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System. Disparity ratios and raw differential representation values were calculated for racial and ethnic groups by gender as compared with White or non-Latine children within the same gender category. Within child physical abuse cases, Black and multiracial children were more likely to have cases substantiated compared with White children. Conversely, neglect cases were generally associated with lower rates of substantiation for Black girls and boys compared with White children in most states. Substantiation rates were also lower for Black girls within child sexual abuse cases in most states. Latine boys were typically less likely to have physical abuse cases substantiated and Latine girls were typically more likely to have sexual abuse cases substantiated compared with non-Latine children; rates of neglect were not consistently disparate by ethnicity. Findings demonstrate the importance of examining race, ethnicity, and gender in child abuse and neglect case dispositions. Consistent patterns in disparities were evident across many states, which may have important implications for state-level policies and disparity reduction strategies. Future research should extend and replicate successful efforts, and develop and test promising new methods, to prevent disparities in child abuse and neglect case processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 108332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in substantiated child maltreatment: A state-level analysis of U.S. incidence rates\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L. Fix ,&nbsp;Amanda Luken ,&nbsp;Reshmi Nair ,&nbsp;Spencer T. Fix\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The scope of the problem of child maltreatment warrants more nuanced epidemiologic investigation. Our study examined state-level rates of child maltreatment (i.e., child physical abuse, child sexual abuse, neglect) by race, ethnicity, and gender. We used 3,972,565 million cases of child physical and sexual abuse and neglect from the 2018 U.S. National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System. Disparity ratios and raw differential representation values were calculated for racial and ethnic groups by gender as compared with White or non-Latine children within the same gender category. Within child physical abuse cases, Black and multiracial children were more likely to have cases substantiated compared with White children. Conversely, neglect cases were generally associated with lower rates of substantiation for Black girls and boys compared with White children in most states. Substantiation rates were also lower for Black girls within child sexual abuse cases in most states. Latine boys were typically less likely to have physical abuse cases substantiated and Latine girls were typically more likely to have sexual abuse cases substantiated compared with non-Latine children; rates of neglect were not consistently disparate by ethnicity. Findings demonstrate the importance of examining race, ethnicity, and gender in child abuse and neglect case dispositions. Consistent patterns in disparities were evident across many states, which may have important implications for state-level policies and disparity reduction strategies. Future research should extend and replicate successful efforts, and develop and test promising new methods, to prevent disparities in child abuse and neglect case processing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925002154\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925002154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虐待儿童问题的范围需要更细致的流行病学调查。我们的研究按种族、民族和性别调查了各州儿童虐待(即儿童身体虐待、儿童性虐待、忽视)的发生率。我们使用了2018年美国国家儿童虐待和忽视数据系统中的397.2565亿例儿童身体虐待和性虐待和忽视案例。与同性别的白人或非拉丁裔儿童相比,按性别计算种族和族裔群体的差异比率和原始差异代表性值。在儿童身体虐待案件中,与白人儿童相比,黑人和多种族儿童更有可能得到证实。相反,在大多数州,与白人儿童相比,黑人女孩和男孩的忽视案件通常与较低的证实率有关。在大多数州,黑人女孩在儿童性侵案件中的证实率也较低。与非拉丁裔儿童相比,拉丁裔男孩通常不太可能受到身体虐待,拉丁裔女孩通常更容易受到性虐待;被忽视的比率并不总是因种族而异。研究结果表明,在儿童虐待和忽视案件处理中,检查种族、民族和性别的重要性。差异的一致模式在许多州都很明显,这可能对州一级的政策和减少差异的战略产生重要影响。未来的研究应该扩展和复制成功的努力,开发和测试有前途的新方法,以防止虐待和忽视儿童案件处理方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in substantiated child maltreatment: A state-level analysis of U.S. incidence rates
The scope of the problem of child maltreatment warrants more nuanced epidemiologic investigation. Our study examined state-level rates of child maltreatment (i.e., child physical abuse, child sexual abuse, neglect) by race, ethnicity, and gender. We used 3,972,565 million cases of child physical and sexual abuse and neglect from the 2018 U.S. National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System. Disparity ratios and raw differential representation values were calculated for racial and ethnic groups by gender as compared with White or non-Latine children within the same gender category. Within child physical abuse cases, Black and multiracial children were more likely to have cases substantiated compared with White children. Conversely, neglect cases were generally associated with lower rates of substantiation for Black girls and boys compared with White children in most states. Substantiation rates were also lower for Black girls within child sexual abuse cases in most states. Latine boys were typically less likely to have physical abuse cases substantiated and Latine girls were typically more likely to have sexual abuse cases substantiated compared with non-Latine children; rates of neglect were not consistently disparate by ethnicity. Findings demonstrate the importance of examining race, ethnicity, and gender in child abuse and neglect case dispositions. Consistent patterns in disparities were evident across many states, which may have important implications for state-level policies and disparity reduction strategies. Future research should extend and replicate successful efforts, and develop and test promising new methods, to prevent disparities in child abuse and neglect case processing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信