口服阿司匹林预防感染性心内膜炎栓塞事件的疗效:一项系统综述和meta分析

Q4 Medicine
Jonathan Victor Salazar-Ore , Angie Carolina Alonso-Ramírez , Gabriela Vanessa Flores-Monar , Emily Patricia Solarte-Zabaleta , Miguel Ángel Castaneda-Diaz , Ada Lizandra Motino-Villanueva , Anuj Manish-Kakkad , Camila Sanchez-Cruz , Ernesto Calderón-Martínez
{"title":"口服阿司匹林预防感染性心内膜炎栓塞事件的疗效:一项系统综述和meta分析","authors":"Jonathan Victor Salazar-Ore ,&nbsp;Angie Carolina Alonso-Ramírez ,&nbsp;Gabriela Vanessa Flores-Monar ,&nbsp;Emily Patricia Solarte-Zabaleta ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Castaneda-Diaz ,&nbsp;Ada Lizandra Motino-Villanueva ,&nbsp;Anuj Manish-Kakkad ,&nbsp;Camila Sanchez-Cruz ,&nbsp;Ernesto Calderón-Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.tru.2025.100208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Infective endocarditis (IE) involves inflammation of the heart's inner lining and valves, leading to complications like embolic events. The role of aspirin in preventing these events is controversial, with concerns about bleeding risk, limiting its use. This meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of oral aspirin in preventing embolic events and its adverse outcomes in IE patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted on July 20, 2024, across PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL for studies comparing aspirin to placebo or no treatment. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024573274).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five studies involving 1174 participants were included, with three eligible for meta-analysis due to data limitations. Findings on embolic event incidence were inconsistent: one randomized clinical trial (RCT) excluding prior aspirin therapy (OR 1.62, [0.68–3.86], p = 0.29) and a reanalysis examining long-term use (OR 0.80, [0.36–1.78], p = 0.582) found no significant reduction, while another study reported a possible reduction (OR 0.65, [0.43–0.98], p = 0.04). Bleeding rates trended higher in aspirin groups across two studies, though not statistically significant. Mortality data also varied; one study found higher mortality in aspirin users, while another associated chronic antiplatelet therapy with lower mortality, particularly with early initiation after admission.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Aspirin may reduce embolic events in IE, but evidence remains inconclusive due to mixed findings. Aspirin showed a non-significant increase in bleeding risk and mortality, so routine use for embolic prevention in IE is not recommended, highlighting the need for further research to clarify its potential role.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34401,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Update","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of oral aspirin in prevention of embolic events in infective endocarditis: A systematic review and meta analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Victor Salazar-Ore ,&nbsp;Angie Carolina Alonso-Ramírez ,&nbsp;Gabriela Vanessa Flores-Monar ,&nbsp;Emily Patricia Solarte-Zabaleta ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Castaneda-Diaz ,&nbsp;Ada Lizandra Motino-Villanueva ,&nbsp;Anuj Manish-Kakkad ,&nbsp;Camila Sanchez-Cruz ,&nbsp;Ernesto Calderón-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tru.2025.100208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Infective endocarditis (IE) involves inflammation of the heart's inner lining and valves, leading to complications like embolic events. The role of aspirin in preventing these events is controversial, with concerns about bleeding risk, limiting its use. This meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of oral aspirin in preventing embolic events and its adverse outcomes in IE patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted on July 20, 2024, across PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL for studies comparing aspirin to placebo or no treatment. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024573274).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five studies involving 1174 participants were included, with three eligible for meta-analysis due to data limitations. Findings on embolic event incidence were inconsistent: one randomized clinical trial (RCT) excluding prior aspirin therapy (OR 1.62, [0.68–3.86], p = 0.29) and a reanalysis examining long-term use (OR 0.80, [0.36–1.78], p = 0.582) found no significant reduction, while another study reported a possible reduction (OR 0.65, [0.43–0.98], p = 0.04). Bleeding rates trended higher in aspirin groups across two studies, though not statistically significant. Mortality data also varied; one study found higher mortality in aspirin users, while another associated chronic antiplatelet therapy with lower mortality, particularly with early initiation after admission.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Aspirin may reduce embolic events in IE, but evidence remains inconclusive due to mixed findings. Aspirin showed a non-significant increase in bleeding risk and mortality, so routine use for embolic prevention in IE is not recommended, highlighting the need for further research to clarify its potential role.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572725000112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572725000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感染性心内膜炎(IE)涉及心脏内膜和瓣膜的炎症,可导致栓塞事件等并发症。阿司匹林在预防这些事件中的作用是有争议的,由于担心出血风险,限制了它的使用。本荟萃分析评估了口服阿司匹林在预防IE患者栓塞事件及其不良后果方面的有效性。方法于2024年7月20日在PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane、Scopus、Web of Science、EMBASE和CINAHL上进行系统检索,比较阿司匹林与安慰剂或不治疗的研究。该协议已在PROSPERO (CRD42024573274)中注册。结果纳入5项研究,涉及1174名受试者,其中3项由于数据限制符合meta分析。栓塞事件发生率的研究结果不一致:一项不包括既往阿司匹林治疗的随机临床试验(RCT) (OR 1.62, [0.68-3.86], p = 0.29)和一项检查长期使用阿司匹林的再分析(OR 0.80, [0.36-1.78], p = 0.582)未发现显著降低,而另一项研究报告可能降低(OR 0.65, [0.43-0.98], p = 0.04)。在两项研究中,阿司匹林组的出血率呈上升趋势,尽管没有统计学意义。死亡率数据也各不相同;一项研究发现阿司匹林使用者死亡率较高,而另一项研究发现慢性抗血小板治疗死亡率较低,特别是入院后早期开始治疗。结论:阿司匹林可能减少IE患者的栓塞事件,但由于研究结果不一,证据仍不确定。阿司匹林显示出血风险和死亡率无显著增加,因此不建议常规使用阿司匹林预防IE栓塞,强调需要进一步研究以阐明其潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of oral aspirin in prevention of embolic events in infective endocarditis: A systematic review and meta analysis

Introduction

Infective endocarditis (IE) involves inflammation of the heart's inner lining and valves, leading to complications like embolic events. The role of aspirin in preventing these events is controversial, with concerns about bleeding risk, limiting its use. This meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of oral aspirin in preventing embolic events and its adverse outcomes in IE patients.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted on July 20, 2024, across PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL for studies comparing aspirin to placebo or no treatment. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024573274).

Results

Five studies involving 1174 participants were included, with three eligible for meta-analysis due to data limitations. Findings on embolic event incidence were inconsistent: one randomized clinical trial (RCT) excluding prior aspirin therapy (OR 1.62, [0.68–3.86], p = 0.29) and a reanalysis examining long-term use (OR 0.80, [0.36–1.78], p = 0.582) found no significant reduction, while another study reported a possible reduction (OR 0.65, [0.43–0.98], p = 0.04). Bleeding rates trended higher in aspirin groups across two studies, though not statistically significant. Mortality data also varied; one study found higher mortality in aspirin users, while another associated chronic antiplatelet therapy with lower mortality, particularly with early initiation after admission.

Conclusion

Aspirin may reduce embolic events in IE, but evidence remains inconclusive due to mixed findings. Aspirin showed a non-significant increase in bleeding risk and mortality, so routine use for embolic prevention in IE is not recommended, highlighting the need for further research to clarify its potential role.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis Update
Thrombosis Update Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
86 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信