Eptinezumab治疗阵发性丛集性头痛的有效性和安全性:一项随机临床试验。

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rigmor H Jensen,Cristina Tassorelli,Stewart J Tepper,Andrew Charles,Peter J Goadsby,Agneta H Snoer,Bjørn Sperling,Mette Krog Josiassen,Christine Borgen Linander,Anders Ettrup,Neli Boneva
{"title":"Eptinezumab治疗阵发性丛集性头痛的有效性和安全性:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Rigmor H Jensen,Cristina Tassorelli,Stewart J Tepper,Andrew Charles,Peter J Goadsby,Agneta H Snoer,Bjørn Sperling,Mette Krog Josiassen,Christine Borgen Linander,Anders Ettrup,Neli Boneva","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nCluster headache, characterized by bouts of excruciating pain attacks, detrimentally affects health and quality of life. Eptinezumab is an anticalcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody approved for migraine prevention.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in the preventive treatment of episodic cluster headache.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nThis double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (1:1) clinical trial (Eptinezumab in Participants With Episodic Cluster Headache [ALLEVIATE]) was conducted between December 2020 and October 2023. Results are from the initial 4-week randomized phase. The study took place at 64 sites across Europe, the US, and Japan. Included were adults (aged 18-75 years) with a history of episodic cluster headache for 1 or more years (with bouts lasting ≥6 weeks when untreated) and previous acute and preventive medication use.\r\n\r\nInterventions\r\nEptinezumab, 400 mg, or placebo (intravenous infusion).\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nThe primary end point was the change from baseline in the number of weekly attacks in weeks 1 to 2. Safety was assessed using treatment-emergent adverse events.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nOf 628 total participants screened, 320 entered the second screening period, and 231 met eligibility criteria. Of the 231 participants randomized (eptinezumab, n = 118; placebo, n = 113), 215 (93%) completed the placebo-controlled period. The participant mean (SD) age was 44 (11) years, and 178 of 229 were male (78%). At baseline, the mean (SD) weekly attacks were 15.2 (8.1) in the eptinezumab group and 15.7 (8.3) in the placebo group. There was no statistically significant difference between eptinezumab and placebo in the change from baseline in the number of weekly attacks over weeks 1 to 2 (least-squares mean [SE], -4.0 [0.93] vs -4.6 [0.89]; between-group difference, 0.7; 95% CI, -1.3 to 2.6; P = .50). More eptinezumab-treated participants achieved 50% or greater response vs placebo over week 2 (50.9% [54 of 106] vs 37.3% [41 of 110]; odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.03-3.07; P =.04), week 3 (62.5% [65 of 104] vs 43.8% [49 of 112]; OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.30-3.97; P =.004), and week 4 (66.7% [68 of 102] vs 50.5% [54 of 107]; OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.21-3.83; P =.009). Eptinezumab showed numerically larger improvements than placebo for 75% or greater response, average daily pain scores, and across other patient-reported outcomes. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 25.0% of patients (28 of 112) receiving eptinezumab and 26.5% of patients (31 of 117) receiving placebo.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nAmong adults with episodic cluster headache, eptinezumab did not significantly reduce the number of attacks vs placebo, although it was associated with numerically higher responder rates and improvements in average daily pain and patient-reported outcomes. Eptinezumab was generally well tolerated.\r\n\r\nTrial Registration\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04688775.","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab in Episodic Cluster Headache: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rigmor H Jensen,Cristina Tassorelli,Stewart J Tepper,Andrew Charles,Peter J Goadsby,Agneta H Snoer,Bjørn Sperling,Mette Krog Josiassen,Christine Borgen Linander,Anders Ettrup,Neli Boneva\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance\\r\\nCluster headache, characterized by bouts of excruciating pain attacks, detrimentally affects health and quality of life. Eptinezumab is an anticalcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody approved for migraine prevention.\\r\\n\\r\\nObjective\\r\\nTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in the preventive treatment of episodic cluster headache.\\r\\n\\r\\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\\r\\nThis double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (1:1) clinical trial (Eptinezumab in Participants With Episodic Cluster Headache [ALLEVIATE]) was conducted between December 2020 and October 2023. Results are from the initial 4-week randomized phase. The study took place at 64 sites across Europe, the US, and Japan. Included were adults (aged 18-75 years) with a history of episodic cluster headache for 1 or more years (with bouts lasting ≥6 weeks when untreated) and previous acute and preventive medication use.\\r\\n\\r\\nInterventions\\r\\nEptinezumab, 400 mg, or placebo (intravenous infusion).\\r\\n\\r\\nMain Outcomes and Measures\\r\\nThe primary end point was the change from baseline in the number of weekly attacks in weeks 1 to 2. Safety was assessed using treatment-emergent adverse events.\\r\\n\\r\\nResults\\r\\nOf 628 total participants screened, 320 entered the second screening period, and 231 met eligibility criteria. Of the 231 participants randomized (eptinezumab, n = 118; placebo, n = 113), 215 (93%) completed the placebo-controlled period. The participant mean (SD) age was 44 (11) years, and 178 of 229 were male (78%). At baseline, the mean (SD) weekly attacks were 15.2 (8.1) in the eptinezumab group and 15.7 (8.3) in the placebo group. There was no statistically significant difference between eptinezumab and placebo in the change from baseline in the number of weekly attacks over weeks 1 to 2 (least-squares mean [SE], -4.0 [0.93] vs -4.6 [0.89]; between-group difference, 0.7; 95% CI, -1.3 to 2.6; P = .50). More eptinezumab-treated participants achieved 50% or greater response vs placebo over week 2 (50.9% [54 of 106] vs 37.3% [41 of 110]; odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.03-3.07; P =.04), week 3 (62.5% [65 of 104] vs 43.8% [49 of 112]; OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.30-3.97; P =.004), and week 4 (66.7% [68 of 102] vs 50.5% [54 of 107]; OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.21-3.83; P =.009). Eptinezumab showed numerically larger improvements than placebo for 75% or greater response, average daily pain scores, and across other patient-reported outcomes. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 25.0% of patients (28 of 112) receiving eptinezumab and 26.5% of patients (31 of 117) receiving placebo.\\r\\n\\r\\nConclusions and Relevance\\r\\nAmong adults with episodic cluster headache, eptinezumab did not significantly reduce the number of attacks vs placebo, although it was associated with numerically higher responder rates and improvements in average daily pain and patient-reported outcomes. Eptinezumab was generally well tolerated.\\r\\n\\r\\nTrial Registration\\r\\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04688775.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1317\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

丛集性头痛以阵发性剧痛为特征,对健康和生活质量有不利影响。Eptinezumab是一种被批准用于偏头痛预防的抗降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体。目的评价艾替单抗预防治疗阵发性丛集性头痛的疗效和安全性。设计、环境和参与者本双盲、安慰剂对照、随机(1:1)临床试验(Eptinezumab治疗发作性丛集性头痛[缓解]患者)于2020年12月至2023年10月进行。结果来自最初的4周随机期。这项研究在欧洲、美国和日本的64个地点进行。纳入的成人(18-75岁)有发作性丛集性头痛病史1年或1年以上(未治疗时发作持续≥6周),既往使用急性和预防性药物。干预:septinezumab, 400mg,或安慰剂(静脉输注)。主要结局和测量主要终点是第1周至第2周每周攻击次数从基线的变化。安全性评估采用治疗后出现的不良事件。结果628名受试者中,320人进入第二筛选期,231人符合入选标准。在随机分配的231名参与者中(eptinezumab, n = 118;安慰剂组,n = 113), 215例(93%)完成安慰剂对照期。参与者的平均(SD)年龄为44(11)岁,229人中有178人是男性(78%)。基线时,eptinezumab组的平均(SD)周发作次数为15.2次(8.1次),安慰剂组为15.7次(8.3次)。在第1周至第2周,依替单抗和安慰剂从基线开始的每周发作次数变化无统计学差异(最小二乘平均值[SE], -4.0 [0.93] vs -4.6 [0.89];组间差异,0.7;95% CI, -1.3 ~ 2.6;p = .50)。在第2周,与安慰剂相比,更多接受依替单抗治疗的参与者获得了50%或更高的缓解(50.9%[106 / 54]对37.3% [110 / 41];优势比[OR], 1.77;95% ci, 1.03-3.07;P =.04),第3周(62.5%[104人中的65人]vs 43.8%[112人中的49人];或者,2.26;95% ci, 1.30-3.97;P = 0.004),第4周(66.7%[102人中的68人]vs 50.5%[107人中的54人];或者,2.14;95% ci, 1.21-3.83;P = .009)。Eptinezumab在75%或更高的应答率、平均每日疼痛评分和其他患者报告的结果方面比安慰剂有更大的改善。接受eptinezumab治疗的患者中有25.0%(112人中有28人)发生了治疗后出现的不良事件,接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有26.5%(117人中有31人)发生了治疗后出现的不良事件。结论和相关性:在患有阵发性丛集性头痛的成年人中,与安慰剂相比,eptinezumab并没有显著减少发作次数,尽管它与数字上更高的应答率和平均每日疼痛和患者报告的结果的改善相关。Eptinezumab总体耐受性良好。临床试验注册。gov标识符:NCT04688775。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab in Episodic Cluster Headache: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance Cluster headache, characterized by bouts of excruciating pain attacks, detrimentally affects health and quality of life. Eptinezumab is an anticalcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody approved for migraine prevention. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in the preventive treatment of episodic cluster headache. Design, Setting, and Participants This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (1:1) clinical trial (Eptinezumab in Participants With Episodic Cluster Headache [ALLEVIATE]) was conducted between December 2020 and October 2023. Results are from the initial 4-week randomized phase. The study took place at 64 sites across Europe, the US, and Japan. Included were adults (aged 18-75 years) with a history of episodic cluster headache for 1 or more years (with bouts lasting ≥6 weeks when untreated) and previous acute and preventive medication use. Interventions Eptinezumab, 400 mg, or placebo (intravenous infusion). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the change from baseline in the number of weekly attacks in weeks 1 to 2. Safety was assessed using treatment-emergent adverse events. Results Of 628 total participants screened, 320 entered the second screening period, and 231 met eligibility criteria. Of the 231 participants randomized (eptinezumab, n = 118; placebo, n = 113), 215 (93%) completed the placebo-controlled period. The participant mean (SD) age was 44 (11) years, and 178 of 229 were male (78%). At baseline, the mean (SD) weekly attacks were 15.2 (8.1) in the eptinezumab group and 15.7 (8.3) in the placebo group. There was no statistically significant difference between eptinezumab and placebo in the change from baseline in the number of weekly attacks over weeks 1 to 2 (least-squares mean [SE], -4.0 [0.93] vs -4.6 [0.89]; between-group difference, 0.7; 95% CI, -1.3 to 2.6; P = .50). More eptinezumab-treated participants achieved 50% or greater response vs placebo over week 2 (50.9% [54 of 106] vs 37.3% [41 of 110]; odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.03-3.07; P =.04), week 3 (62.5% [65 of 104] vs 43.8% [49 of 112]; OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.30-3.97; P =.004), and week 4 (66.7% [68 of 102] vs 50.5% [54 of 107]; OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.21-3.83; P =.009). Eptinezumab showed numerically larger improvements than placebo for 75% or greater response, average daily pain scores, and across other patient-reported outcomes. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 25.0% of patients (28 of 112) receiving eptinezumab and 26.5% of patients (31 of 117) receiving placebo. Conclusions and Relevance Among adults with episodic cluster headache, eptinezumab did not significantly reduce the number of attacks vs placebo, although it was associated with numerically higher responder rates and improvements in average daily pain and patient-reported outcomes. Eptinezumab was generally well tolerated. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04688775.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信