Jessica Pourian, Jhanavi Kapadia, Melinda Li, Phinnara Has, Jason Rafferty, Syd Loiselle, Abigail Donaldson, Emily B Allen, Jack C Rusley
{"title":"青少年对性取向和性别认同收集的舒适度和对电子健康记录文件的偏好。","authors":"Jessica Pourian, Jhanavi Kapadia, Melinda Li, Phinnara Has, Jason Rafferty, Syd Loiselle, Abigail Donaldson, Emily B Allen, Jack C Rusley","doi":"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assessing sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) is a key element in delivering high quality health care to adolescents and young adults (AYAs). However, AYA perspectives on SOGI data collection remain understudied. Therefore, we aimed to assess perceived importance of and comfort with SOGI data collection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AYA attending outpatient visits completed an anonymous survey. We assessed importance (Likert scale: 5 = strongly disagree to 1 = strongly agree) and comfort with various collection methods (yes/no), as well as willingness to share name and/or pronouns in the electronic health record (EHR) (yes/no). AYA were classified as transgender and gender diverse (TGD) versus cisgender; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, other versus heterosexual. Mean scores were calculated and t-tests used to compare importance across groups; Fisher's exact tests were used to compare comfort and EHR preferences across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 260 AYA ages 10 to 26, 50% were TGD and 52% were lesbian, gay, bisexual, other. The mean importance of gender identity among all AYA was 3.9, and TGD had higher ratings than cisgender AYA (4.4 vs. 3.6, p < .001). There were no differences between cisgender and TGD AYA with respect to sexual orientationimportance (3.6 vs. 3.3, p = .08). Ninety-six percent of AYA were comfortable with one or more methods of SOGI collection. Nearly all (96%) TGD youth were willing to share both their name and pronouns in the EHR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most AYA consider SOGI collection important and are comfortable being asked in clinic. Nearly all TGD youth preferred sharing both their name and pronouns in the EHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":56278,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescent Comfort With Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Collection and Preferences for Electronic Health Record Documentation in the Ambulatory Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Pourian, Jhanavi Kapadia, Melinda Li, Phinnara Has, Jason Rafferty, Syd Loiselle, Abigail Donaldson, Emily B Allen, Jack C Rusley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assessing sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) is a key element in delivering high quality health care to adolescents and young adults (AYAs). However, AYA perspectives on SOGI data collection remain understudied. Therefore, we aimed to assess perceived importance of and comfort with SOGI data collection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AYA attending outpatient visits completed an anonymous survey. We assessed importance (Likert scale: 5 = strongly disagree to 1 = strongly agree) and comfort with various collection methods (yes/no), as well as willingness to share name and/or pronouns in the electronic health record (EHR) (yes/no). AYA were classified as transgender and gender diverse (TGD) versus cisgender; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, other versus heterosexual. Mean scores were calculated and t-tests used to compare importance across groups; Fisher's exact tests were used to compare comfort and EHR preferences across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 260 AYA ages 10 to 26, 50% were TGD and 52% were lesbian, gay, bisexual, other. The mean importance of gender identity among all AYA was 3.9, and TGD had higher ratings than cisgender AYA (4.4 vs. 3.6, p < .001). There were no differences between cisgender and TGD AYA with respect to sexual orientationimportance (3.6 vs. 3.3, p = .08). Ninety-six percent of AYA were comfortable with one or more methods of SOGI collection. Nearly all (96%) TGD youth were willing to share both their name and pronouns in the EHR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most AYA consider SOGI collection important and are comfortable being asked in clinic. Nearly all TGD youth preferred sharing both their name and pronouns in the EHR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescent Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescent Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.03.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.03.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估性取向和性别认同(SOGI)是向青少年和年轻人(AYAs)提供高质量卫生保健的关键因素。然而,AYA对SOGI数据收集的看法仍未得到充分研究。因此,我们旨在评估对SOGI数据收集的感知重要性和舒适度。方法:AYA参加门诊访问完成匿名调查。我们评估了重要性(李克特量表:5 =非常不同意到1 =非常同意)和对各种收集方法的舒适度(是/否),以及在电子健康记录(EHR)中共享姓名和/或代词的意愿(是/否)。AYA被归类为跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)与顺性别;还有女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋,异性恋和异性恋。计算平均得分,并使用t检验比较各组间的重要性;Fisher的精确测试被用来比较各组间的舒适度和电子病历偏好。结果:260例10 ~ 26岁的AYA中,50%为TGD, 52%为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和其他。性别认同在所有AYA中的平均重要性为3.9,TGD的评分高于顺性别AYA (4.4 vs. 3.6, p < .001)。在性取向重要性方面,顺性别和TGD AYA之间没有差异(3.6 vs. 3.3, p = .08)。96%的AYA对一种或多种SOGI收集方法感到满意。几乎所有(96%)TGD青年都愿意在电子病历中分享他们的名字和代词。讨论:大多数AYA认为SOGI收集是重要的,并且在临床中被询问是很舒服的。几乎所有的TGD青年都喜欢在电子病历中分享自己的名字和代词。
Adolescent Comfort With Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Collection and Preferences for Electronic Health Record Documentation in the Ambulatory Setting.
Purpose: Assessing sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) is a key element in delivering high quality health care to adolescents and young adults (AYAs). However, AYA perspectives on SOGI data collection remain understudied. Therefore, we aimed to assess perceived importance of and comfort with SOGI data collection.
Methods: AYA attending outpatient visits completed an anonymous survey. We assessed importance (Likert scale: 5 = strongly disagree to 1 = strongly agree) and comfort with various collection methods (yes/no), as well as willingness to share name and/or pronouns in the electronic health record (EHR) (yes/no). AYA were classified as transgender and gender diverse (TGD) versus cisgender; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, other versus heterosexual. Mean scores were calculated and t-tests used to compare importance across groups; Fisher's exact tests were used to compare comfort and EHR preferences across groups.
Results: Of 260 AYA ages 10 to 26, 50% were TGD and 52% were lesbian, gay, bisexual, other. The mean importance of gender identity among all AYA was 3.9, and TGD had higher ratings than cisgender AYA (4.4 vs. 3.6, p < .001). There were no differences between cisgender and TGD AYA with respect to sexual orientationimportance (3.6 vs. 3.3, p = .08). Ninety-six percent of AYA were comfortable with one or more methods of SOGI collection. Nearly all (96%) TGD youth were willing to share both their name and pronouns in the EHR.
Discussion: Most AYA consider SOGI collection important and are comfortable being asked in clinic. Nearly all TGD youth preferred sharing both their name and pronouns in the EHR.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Adolescent Health is a scientific publication dedicated to enhancing the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults. Our Journal covers a broad range of research topics, spanning from the basic biological and behavioral sciences to public health and policy. We welcome a variety of contributions, including original research papers, concise reports, literature reviews, clinical case reports, opinion pieces, and letters to the editor. We encourage professionals from diverse disciplines such as Anthropology, Education, Ethics, Global Health, Health Services Research, Law, Medicine, Mental and Behavioral Health, Nursing, Nutrition, Psychology, Public Health and Policy, Social Work, Sociology, and Youth Development to share their expertise and contribute to our mission of promoting adolescent health. Moreover, we value the voices of young individuals, family and community members, and healthcare professionals, and encourage them to submit poetry, personal narratives, images, and other creative works that provide unique insights into the experiences of adolescents and young adults. By combining scientific peer-reviewed research with creative expressions, our Journal aims to create a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in adolescent and young adult health.