15年来3000例减肥手术的手术内和术后介入内镜措施分析:单中心研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Mana Kakuan, Andreas Plamper, Oliver Al-Taie, Andreas Kroh, Florian Vondran, Patrick H Alizai, Tom F Ulmer, Sophia M Schmitz, Karl P Rheinwalt
{"title":"15年来3000例减肥手术的手术内和术后介入内镜措施分析:单中心研究。","authors":"Mana Kakuan, Andreas Plamper, Oliver Al-Taie, Andreas Kroh, Florian Vondran, Patrick H Alizai, Tom F Ulmer, Sophia M Schmitz, Karl P Rheinwalt","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02239-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In addition to preoperative diagnostic gastroscopy, some bariatric surgery patients require one or more differentiated endoscopic interventions as part of postoperative complication management. The aim of this study is to analyze endoscopic interventions regarding indication, type of procedure, material used, and outcome. We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data over a period of 15 years from 2006 to 2021 of all consecutive patients who underwent an interventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after bariatric surgery at our center. The primary study objective was the type and frequency of the treatment. Secondary study objectives included clinical outcomes and postinterventional complications. Of 3000 bariatric procedures, 145 (4.8%), among them 11.1% (n = 54) of 485 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses, 7.1% (n = 20) of 282 redo operations, 5.7% (n = 20) of 351 revisional operations, 3.3% (n = 13) of 398 sleeve gastrectomies, and 1.9% (n = 26) of 1394 one-anastomosis gastric bypasses, received an interventional endoscopy for postoperative complication management. 79.3% (n = 115) were female, mean age was 42.4 (± 10.7) years, mean BMI was 43.5 (± 9.8) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Complication after interventional endoscopy happened in 1.6%, revisional surgery was necessary in 0.5% (n = 3). Causes for endoscopic intervention were stenosis (52.4%), leakage/fistula (35.9%), intraluminal bleeding (13.1%), dumping syndrome (9.0%), and gallstones (1.4%). The performed interventions were balloon dilation (48.3%), stent therapy (33.1%), metallic clipping (12.4%), injection therapy (0.09%), bougienage (0.07%), vacuum therapy (0.06%), and pigtail therapy (0.04%). Endoscopic intervention is an effective and safe way of treating adverse events after bariatric surgery. Stenosis and leakage were the most frequent complications, with endoscopic balloon dilatation and stent therapy as the most frequent and successful treatment options. RYGB was the procedure with the most endoscopic interventional involvement. To better learn about outcomes of specific endoscopic techniques further studies preferably with larger multicenter samples are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of intra- and postoperative interventional endoscopic measures in 3000 bariatric surgical procedures over 15 years: a single center study.\",\"authors\":\"Mana Kakuan, Andreas Plamper, Oliver Al-Taie, Andreas Kroh, Florian Vondran, Patrick H Alizai, Tom F Ulmer, Sophia M Schmitz, Karl P Rheinwalt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02239-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In addition to preoperative diagnostic gastroscopy, some bariatric surgery patients require one or more differentiated endoscopic interventions as part of postoperative complication management. The aim of this study is to analyze endoscopic interventions regarding indication, type of procedure, material used, and outcome. We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data over a period of 15 years from 2006 to 2021 of all consecutive patients who underwent an interventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after bariatric surgery at our center. The primary study objective was the type and frequency of the treatment. Secondary study objectives included clinical outcomes and postinterventional complications. Of 3000 bariatric procedures, 145 (4.8%), among them 11.1% (n = 54) of 485 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses, 7.1% (n = 20) of 282 redo operations, 5.7% (n = 20) of 351 revisional operations, 3.3% (n = 13) of 398 sleeve gastrectomies, and 1.9% (n = 26) of 1394 one-anastomosis gastric bypasses, received an interventional endoscopy for postoperative complication management. 79.3% (n = 115) were female, mean age was 42.4 (± 10.7) years, mean BMI was 43.5 (± 9.8) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Complication after interventional endoscopy happened in 1.6%, revisional surgery was necessary in 0.5% (n = 3). Causes for endoscopic intervention were stenosis (52.4%), leakage/fistula (35.9%), intraluminal bleeding (13.1%), dumping syndrome (9.0%), and gallstones (1.4%). The performed interventions were balloon dilation (48.3%), stent therapy (33.1%), metallic clipping (12.4%), injection therapy (0.09%), bougienage (0.07%), vacuum therapy (0.06%), and pigtail therapy (0.04%). Endoscopic intervention is an effective and safe way of treating adverse events after bariatric surgery. Stenosis and leakage were the most frequent complications, with endoscopic balloon dilatation and stent therapy as the most frequent and successful treatment options. RYGB was the procedure with the most endoscopic interventional involvement. To better learn about outcomes of specific endoscopic techniques further studies preferably with larger multicenter samples are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02239-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02239-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除了术前诊断胃镜检查外,一些减肥手术患者需要一种或多种不同的内镜干预作为术后并发症处理的一部分。本研究的目的是分析内窥镜干预的适应症、手术类型、使用的材料和结果。我们前瞻性地收集并回顾性地分析了从2006年到2021年的15年间,所有在我们中心进行减肥手术后接受介入性上消化道内窥镜检查的连续患者的数据。主要研究目的是治疗的类型和频率。次要研究目标包括临床结果和介入后并发症。在3000例减肥手术中,145例(4.8%)接受了介入内镜治疗,其中485例Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术11.1% (n = 54), 282例重做手术7.1% (n = 20), 351例翻修手术5.7% (n = 20), 398例套式胃切除术3.3% (n = 13), 1394例单吻合式胃旁路手术1.9% (n = 26)。79.3% (n = 115)为女性,平均年龄42.4(±10.7)岁,平均BMI为43.5(±9.8)kg/m2。介入内镜术后并发症发生率为1.6%,翻修手术发生率为0.5% (n = 3)。内镜介入的原因为狭窄(52.4%)、渗漏/瘘(35.9%)、腔内出血(13.1%)、倾倒综合征(9.0%)和胆结石(1.4%)。实施的干预措施为球囊扩张(48.3%)、支架治疗(33.1%)、金属夹(12.4%)、注射治疗(0.09%)、布根治(0.07%)、真空治疗(0.06%)和尾辫治疗(0.04%)。内镜干预是治疗减肥手术后不良事件的一种有效和安全的方法。狭窄和渗漏是最常见的并发症,内镜下球囊扩张和支架治疗是最常见和成功的治疗选择。RYGB是内镜介入程度最高的手术。为了更好地了解特定内镜技术的结果,需要进一步研究更大的多中心样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of intra- and postoperative interventional endoscopic measures in 3000 bariatric surgical procedures over 15 years: a single center study.

In addition to preoperative diagnostic gastroscopy, some bariatric surgery patients require one or more differentiated endoscopic interventions as part of postoperative complication management. The aim of this study is to analyze endoscopic interventions regarding indication, type of procedure, material used, and outcome. We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data over a period of 15 years from 2006 to 2021 of all consecutive patients who underwent an interventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after bariatric surgery at our center. The primary study objective was the type and frequency of the treatment. Secondary study objectives included clinical outcomes and postinterventional complications. Of 3000 bariatric procedures, 145 (4.8%), among them 11.1% (n = 54) of 485 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses, 7.1% (n = 20) of 282 redo operations, 5.7% (n = 20) of 351 revisional operations, 3.3% (n = 13) of 398 sleeve gastrectomies, and 1.9% (n = 26) of 1394 one-anastomosis gastric bypasses, received an interventional endoscopy for postoperative complication management. 79.3% (n = 115) were female, mean age was 42.4 (± 10.7) years, mean BMI was 43.5 (± 9.8) kg/m2. Complication after interventional endoscopy happened in 1.6%, revisional surgery was necessary in 0.5% (n = 3). Causes for endoscopic intervention were stenosis (52.4%), leakage/fistula (35.9%), intraluminal bleeding (13.1%), dumping syndrome (9.0%), and gallstones (1.4%). The performed interventions were balloon dilation (48.3%), stent therapy (33.1%), metallic clipping (12.4%), injection therapy (0.09%), bougienage (0.07%), vacuum therapy (0.06%), and pigtail therapy (0.04%). Endoscopic intervention is an effective and safe way of treating adverse events after bariatric surgery. Stenosis and leakage were the most frequent complications, with endoscopic balloon dilatation and stent therapy as the most frequent and successful treatment options. RYGB was the procedure with the most endoscopic interventional involvement. To better learn about outcomes of specific endoscopic techniques further studies preferably with larger multicenter samples are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信