跨1.5 T和3t扫描仪的多中心和多供应商评估研究(第2部分):ISMRM/NIST MR幻影中的T1和T2标准化。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Siria Pasini, Steffen Ringgaard, Tau Vendelboe, Leyre Garcia-Ruiz, Anika Strittmatter, Giulia Villa, Anish Raj, Rebeca Echeverria-Chasco, Michela Bozzetto, Paolo Brambilla, Malene Aastrup, Esben S S Hansen, Luisa Pierotti, Matteo Renzulli, Susan T Francis, Frank G Zöllner, Christoffer Laustsen, Maria A Fernandez-Seara, Anna Caroli
{"title":"跨1.5 T和3t扫描仪的多中心和多供应商评估研究(第2部分):ISMRM/NIST MR幻影中的T1和T2标准化。","authors":"Siria Pasini, Steffen Ringgaard, Tau Vendelboe, Leyre Garcia-Ruiz, Anika Strittmatter, Giulia Villa, Anish Raj, Rebeca Echeverria-Chasco, Michela Bozzetto, Paolo Brambilla, Malene Aastrup, Esben S S Hansen, Luisa Pierotti, Matteo Renzulli, Susan T Francis, Frank G Zöllner, Christoffer Laustsen, Maria A Fernandez-Seara, Anna Caroli","doi":"10.1007/s10334-025-01260-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess multi-site and multi-vendor accuracy, and intra- and inter-scanner variability of T1 and T2 measurements using the ISMRM/NIST System MRI phantom at room temperature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>T1 and T2 measurements were acquired using standardized NIST protocols on 13 scanners (1.5 T and 3 T) from 3 vendors at 7 sites and compared with reference values at room temperature. Pearson's correlation (r) and accuracy error were used for comparison with reference values, while inter-scanner agreement was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV%). Short-term reproducibility was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots and precision error. Generalized linear mixed models and post hoc tests (α = 0.05) were adopted to compare accuracy and precision across field strengths, vendors, and scanners. T2 measurements were corrected with StimFit toolbox for stimulated echo compensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T1 and T2 measurements had excellent correlation with reference values at both field strengths. Stimfit significantly improved T2 accuracy in the renal range for 9 of 13 scanners. Short-term reproducibility (limits of agreement < 10%) and inter-scanner agreement were good (median CV < 7%) for both T1 and T2 values. Inter-scanner CV was < 5% in the renal range for both parameters.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings support the need of scanner evaluation processes to ensure reliable T1-T2 measurements in multi-center MRI studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-center and multi-vendor evaluation study across 1.5 T and 3 T scanners (part 2): T1 and T2 standardization in the ISMRM/NIST MR phantom.\",\"authors\":\"Siria Pasini, Steffen Ringgaard, Tau Vendelboe, Leyre Garcia-Ruiz, Anika Strittmatter, Giulia Villa, Anish Raj, Rebeca Echeverria-Chasco, Michela Bozzetto, Paolo Brambilla, Malene Aastrup, Esben S S Hansen, Luisa Pierotti, Matteo Renzulli, Susan T Francis, Frank G Zöllner, Christoffer Laustsen, Maria A Fernandez-Seara, Anna Caroli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10334-025-01260-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess multi-site and multi-vendor accuracy, and intra- and inter-scanner variability of T1 and T2 measurements using the ISMRM/NIST System MRI phantom at room temperature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>T1 and T2 measurements were acquired using standardized NIST protocols on 13 scanners (1.5 T and 3 T) from 3 vendors at 7 sites and compared with reference values at room temperature. Pearson's correlation (r) and accuracy error were used for comparison with reference values, while inter-scanner agreement was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV%). Short-term reproducibility was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots and precision error. Generalized linear mixed models and post hoc tests (α = 0.05) were adopted to compare accuracy and precision across field strengths, vendors, and scanners. T2 measurements were corrected with StimFit toolbox for stimulated echo compensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T1 and T2 measurements had excellent correlation with reference values at both field strengths. Stimfit significantly improved T2 accuracy in the renal range for 9 of 13 scanners. Short-term reproducibility (limits of agreement < 10%) and inter-scanner agreement were good (median CV < 7%) for both T1 and T2 values. Inter-scanner CV was < 5% in the renal range for both parameters.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings support the need of scanner evaluation processes to ensure reliable T1-T2 measurements in multi-center MRI studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-025-01260-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-025-01260-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估室温下使用ISMRM/NIST系统MRI模体测量T1和T2的多位点和多供应商准确性,以及扫描仪内和扫描仪间的可变性。材料和方法:T1和T2测量值采用标准化的NIST协议,在来自3家供应商的7个站点的13台扫描仪(1.5 T和3t)上获得,并与室温下的参考值进行比较。使用Pearson相关性(r)和准确度误差与参考值进行比较,而使用变异系数(CV%)评估扫描间一致性。使用Bland-Altman图和精度误差评估短期重复性。采用广义线性混合模型和事后检验(α = 0.05)比较不同场强、供应商和扫描仪的准确度和精密度。T2测量用StimFit工具箱进行校正,以补偿受激回波。结果:在两种场强下,T1和T2测量值与参考值具有良好的相关性。刺激显著提高了13台扫描仪中9台肾脏范围的T2准确性。讨论:这些发现支持了扫描仪评估过程的必要性,以确保多中心MRI研究中可靠的T1-T2测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-center and multi-vendor evaluation study across 1.5 T and 3 T scanners (part 2): T1 and T2 standardization in the ISMRM/NIST MR phantom.

Objective: To assess multi-site and multi-vendor accuracy, and intra- and inter-scanner variability of T1 and T2 measurements using the ISMRM/NIST System MRI phantom at room temperature.

Materials and methods: T1 and T2 measurements were acquired using standardized NIST protocols on 13 scanners (1.5 T and 3 T) from 3 vendors at 7 sites and compared with reference values at room temperature. Pearson's correlation (r) and accuracy error were used for comparison with reference values, while inter-scanner agreement was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV%). Short-term reproducibility was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots and precision error. Generalized linear mixed models and post hoc tests (α = 0.05) were adopted to compare accuracy and precision across field strengths, vendors, and scanners. T2 measurements were corrected with StimFit toolbox for stimulated echo compensation.

Results: T1 and T2 measurements had excellent correlation with reference values at both field strengths. Stimfit significantly improved T2 accuracy in the renal range for 9 of 13 scanners. Short-term reproducibility (limits of agreement < 10%) and inter-scanner agreement were good (median CV < 7%) for both T1 and T2 values. Inter-scanner CV was < 5% in the renal range for both parameters.

Discussion: These findings support the need of scanner evaluation processes to ensure reliable T1-T2 measurements in multi-center MRI studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include: advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology, new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine, study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance, reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信