增强术后恢复方案减少住院时间和术后阿片类药物用于胸廓出口综合征手术减压

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kenneth M Rosenberg, David N Blitzer, Sarah Rosenberger, Mirnal Chaudhary, Rajabrata Sarkar
{"title":"增强术后恢复方案减少住院时间和术后阿片类药物用于胸廓出口综合征手术减压","authors":"Kenneth M Rosenberg, David N Blitzer, Sarah Rosenberger, Mirnal Chaudhary, Rajabrata Sarkar","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>First rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) requires inpatient hospital stay and causes post-operative pain. We hypothesized that an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, including multimodal pain management, would reduce post-operative narcotic use and length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single center case-control study (2016-2022) compared three protocols: 1) conventional peri-operative and pain management, 2) multimodal pain management with implantation of ropivacaine pump, and 3) ERAS peri-operative protocol including ropivacaine pump. Primary (inpatient opioid use and LOS) and secondary outcomes (complications and hospital cost) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>98 patients were evaluated (107 first rib resections). Compared to conventional pain management (median 33 mg/d), daily opioid use significantly decreased with both multimodal pain management alone (14 mg/d, P<0.0001) and full ERAS protocol (11 mg/d, P<0.0001). ERAS patients had shorter LOS than conventional management (1.44 d vs. 3.26 d, P<0.0001), but multimodal pain management alone did not. Complication rates were similar among the three groups, although ERAS patients had increased post-operative ED visits (n=4 (7.4%) vs. n=7 (27%), P=0.024) and readmissions (n=2 (3.7%) vs. n=5 (19%), P=0.034). Index hospital admission cost decreased between the ERAS and conventional groups (mean: $9,327 vs. $13,053, P=0.012). Total hospital cost including ED visits and readmissions, however, was similar between the three protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with other areas of surgery, ERAS yielded a >2-fold decrease in LOS, multimodal pain management alone decreased opioid use, but did not reduce LOS. ERAS protocol increased ED visits and readmissions, suggesting that optimization to decrease readmissions will improve care and lower costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Decreases Hospital Length of Stay and Post-Operative Opioid Use for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Surgical Decompression.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth M Rosenberg, David N Blitzer, Sarah Rosenberger, Mirnal Chaudhary, Rajabrata Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>First rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) requires inpatient hospital stay and causes post-operative pain. We hypothesized that an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, including multimodal pain management, would reduce post-operative narcotic use and length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single center case-control study (2016-2022) compared three protocols: 1) conventional peri-operative and pain management, 2) multimodal pain management with implantation of ropivacaine pump, and 3) ERAS peri-operative protocol including ropivacaine pump. Primary (inpatient opioid use and LOS) and secondary outcomes (complications and hospital cost) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>98 patients were evaluated (107 first rib resections). Compared to conventional pain management (median 33 mg/d), daily opioid use significantly decreased with both multimodal pain management alone (14 mg/d, P<0.0001) and full ERAS protocol (11 mg/d, P<0.0001). ERAS patients had shorter LOS than conventional management (1.44 d vs. 3.26 d, P<0.0001), but multimodal pain management alone did not. Complication rates were similar among the three groups, although ERAS patients had increased post-operative ED visits (n=4 (7.4%) vs. n=7 (27%), P=0.024) and readmissions (n=2 (3.7%) vs. n=5 (19%), P=0.034). Index hospital admission cost decreased between the ERAS and conventional groups (mean: $9,327 vs. $13,053, P=0.012). Total hospital cost including ED visits and readmissions, however, was similar between the three protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with other areas of surgery, ERAS yielded a >2-fold decrease in LOS, multimodal pain management alone decreased opioid use, but did not reduce LOS. ERAS protocol increased ED visits and readmissions, suggesting that optimization to decrease readmissions will improve care and lower costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:第一肋骨切除术治疗胸廓出口综合征(TOS)需住院,术后疼痛。我们假设增强术后恢复(ERAS)方案,包括多模式疼痛管理,将减少术后麻醉使用和住院时间(LOS)。方法:采用回顾性单中心病例对照研究(2016-2022),比较3种方案:1)常规围术期疼痛管理方案,2)植入罗哌卡因泵的多模式疼痛管理方案,3)包括罗哌卡因泵的ERAS围术期方案。主要(住院阿片类药物使用和LOS)和次要结局(并发症和住院费用)进行了评估。结果:98例患者接受评估(107例第一肋骨切除)。与传统疼痛管理(中位33 mg/d)相比,单独采用多模式疼痛管理(14 mg/d)可显著降低每日阿片类药物的使用。结论:与其他手术领域一致,ERAS可使LOS降低1.5倍,单独采用多模式疼痛管理可减少阿片类药物的使用,但未降低LOS。ERAS方案增加了急诊访问量和再入院率,表明优化减少再入院率将改善护理和降低成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Decreases Hospital Length of Stay and Post-Operative Opioid Use for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Surgical Decompression.

Objective: First rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) requires inpatient hospital stay and causes post-operative pain. We hypothesized that an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, including multimodal pain management, would reduce post-operative narcotic use and length of stay (LOS).

Methods: A retrospective single center case-control study (2016-2022) compared three protocols: 1) conventional peri-operative and pain management, 2) multimodal pain management with implantation of ropivacaine pump, and 3) ERAS peri-operative protocol including ropivacaine pump. Primary (inpatient opioid use and LOS) and secondary outcomes (complications and hospital cost) were assessed.

Results: 98 patients were evaluated (107 first rib resections). Compared to conventional pain management (median 33 mg/d), daily opioid use significantly decreased with both multimodal pain management alone (14 mg/d, P<0.0001) and full ERAS protocol (11 mg/d, P<0.0001). ERAS patients had shorter LOS than conventional management (1.44 d vs. 3.26 d, P<0.0001), but multimodal pain management alone did not. Complication rates were similar among the three groups, although ERAS patients had increased post-operative ED visits (n=4 (7.4%) vs. n=7 (27%), P=0.024) and readmissions (n=2 (3.7%) vs. n=5 (19%), P=0.034). Index hospital admission cost decreased between the ERAS and conventional groups (mean: $9,327 vs. $13,053, P=0.012). Total hospital cost including ED visits and readmissions, however, was similar between the three protocols.

Conclusions: Consistent with other areas of surgery, ERAS yielded a >2-fold decrease in LOS, multimodal pain management alone decreased opioid use, but did not reduce LOS. ERAS protocol increased ED visits and readmissions, suggesting that optimization to decrease readmissions will improve care and lower costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信