2004年至2019年美国胶质母细胞瘤治疗、生存和获得护理的差异趋势:国家癌症数据库分析

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
John Pham, Jonathan Sisti, David J Cote, Keiko Kang, Robert G Briggs, David Gomez, Ishan Shah, Sean E Lawler, Clark C Chen, Frank Attenello, Gabriel Zada
{"title":"2004年至2019年美国胶质母细胞瘤治疗、生存和获得护理的差异趋势:国家癌症数据库分析","authors":"John Pham, Jonathan Sisti, David J Cote, Keiko Kang, Robert G Briggs, David Gomez, Ishan Shah, Sean E Lawler, Clark C Chen, Frank Attenello, Gabriel Zada","doi":"10.3171/2025.1.JNS242671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Population-based studies of histologically confirmed glioblastoma without molecular classification have demonstrated the doubling of 3-year overall survival (OS) since 2005 despite minimal additions to the treatment armamentarium. The authors aimed to evaluate whether changes in tumor characteristics and treatment patterns were associated with survival outcomes. Additionally, the authors sought to elucidate disparities in access to established and novel therapeutic modalities for patients with glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors queried all patients diagnosed with glioblastoma by histology irrespective of biomarkers from the National Cancer Database and divided patients into 4 equal periods: 2004-2007, 2008-2011, 2012-2015, and 2016-2019. The chi-square test and independent t-test/ANOVA were used to assess associations between categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Differences in OS were tested using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors of receiving trimodal therapy (surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy) and immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127,737 patients with glioblastoma were included, of whom 74,387 (58.2%) were males. The proportion of patients receiving trimodal therapy (48.7% vs 60.0%) significantly increased from period 1 to period 4 (p < 0.001). There were higher rates of gross-total resection (28.6% [period 3] vs 33.8% [period 4]), greater total radiation doses of 60 Gy delivered (39.4% [period 1] vs 60.0% [period 4]), increased use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (16.3% [period 1] vs 62.0% [period 4]), and decreased use of stereotactic radiosurgery (1.5% [period 1] vs 0.8% [period 4]) across the study period (all p < 0.001). Lower total radiotherapy doses (≤ 40.05 Gy) were more commonly administered to elderly patients (≥ 70 years) over time, increasing from 23.4% in period 1 to 42.5% in period 4 (p < 0.001). The use of immunotherapy increased 15-fold (0.4% in period 1 vs 6.2% in period 4, p < 0.001). Comparatively, 2-year OS (17.6% vs 24.6%) and 3-year OS (10.0% vs 15.5%) both increased from period 1 to period 4 (p < 0.001). Patient age, race/ethnicity, education level, insurance status, and treatment facility location/type were independent predictors of receiving trimodal therapy and immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvements observed in OS for glioblastoma over the past 2 decades were associated with an increased use of trimodal therapy in accordance with clinical guidelines. Addressing ongoing disparities in the access to established and novel therapeutic modalities for glioblastoma is necessary to optimize outcomes and enhance research discoveries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in glioblastoma treatment, survival, and disparities in access to care in the United States from 2004 to 2019: a National Cancer Database analysis.\",\"authors\":\"John Pham, Jonathan Sisti, David J Cote, Keiko Kang, Robert G Briggs, David Gomez, Ishan Shah, Sean E Lawler, Clark C Chen, Frank Attenello, Gabriel Zada\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.1.JNS242671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Population-based studies of histologically confirmed glioblastoma without molecular classification have demonstrated the doubling of 3-year overall survival (OS) since 2005 despite minimal additions to the treatment armamentarium. The authors aimed to evaluate whether changes in tumor characteristics and treatment patterns were associated with survival outcomes. Additionally, the authors sought to elucidate disparities in access to established and novel therapeutic modalities for patients with glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors queried all patients diagnosed with glioblastoma by histology irrespective of biomarkers from the National Cancer Database and divided patients into 4 equal periods: 2004-2007, 2008-2011, 2012-2015, and 2016-2019. The chi-square test and independent t-test/ANOVA were used to assess associations between categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Differences in OS were tested using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors of receiving trimodal therapy (surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy) and immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127,737 patients with glioblastoma were included, of whom 74,387 (58.2%) were males. The proportion of patients receiving trimodal therapy (48.7% vs 60.0%) significantly increased from period 1 to period 4 (p < 0.001). There were higher rates of gross-total resection (28.6% [period 3] vs 33.8% [period 4]), greater total radiation doses of 60 Gy delivered (39.4% [period 1] vs 60.0% [period 4]), increased use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (16.3% [period 1] vs 62.0% [period 4]), and decreased use of stereotactic radiosurgery (1.5% [period 1] vs 0.8% [period 4]) across the study period (all p < 0.001). Lower total radiotherapy doses (≤ 40.05 Gy) were more commonly administered to elderly patients (≥ 70 years) over time, increasing from 23.4% in period 1 to 42.5% in period 4 (p < 0.001). The use of immunotherapy increased 15-fold (0.4% in period 1 vs 6.2% in period 4, p < 0.001). Comparatively, 2-year OS (17.6% vs 24.6%) and 3-year OS (10.0% vs 15.5%) both increased from period 1 to period 4 (p < 0.001). Patient age, race/ethnicity, education level, insurance status, and treatment facility location/type were independent predictors of receiving trimodal therapy and immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvements observed in OS for glioblastoma over the past 2 decades were associated with an increased use of trimodal therapy in accordance with clinical guidelines. Addressing ongoing disparities in the access to established and novel therapeutic modalities for glioblastoma is necessary to optimize outcomes and enhance research discoveries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.JNS242671\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.JNS242671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:组织学证实的无分子分类胶质母细胞瘤的基于人群的研究表明,自2005年以来,尽管增加了最小的治疗手段,但3年总生存率(OS)增加了一倍。作者旨在评估肿瘤特征和治疗模式的改变是否与生存结果相关。此外,作者试图阐明胶质母细胞瘤患者获得现有和新的治疗方式的差异。方法:作者从国家癌症数据库中查询所有经组织学诊断为胶质母细胞瘤的患者,不考虑生物标志物,并将患者分为4个相同的时期:2004-2007年、2008-2011年、2012-2015年和2016-2019年。分别采用卡方检验和独立t检验/方差分析来评估分类变量和连续变量之间的相关性。OS差异采用Kaplan-Meier log-rank检验。构建Logistic回归模型以确定接受三模式治疗(手术、放疗和化疗)和免疫治疗的预测因子。结果:共纳入127737例胶质母细胞瘤患者,其中男性74387例(58.2%)。从第1期到第4期,接受三模式治疗的患者比例(48.7% vs 60.0%)显著增加(p < 0.001)。在整个研究期间,总切除率更高(28.6%[第3期]vs 33.8%[第4期]),总放射剂量更高(39.4%[第1期]vs 60.0%[第4期]),调强放疗的使用增加(16.3%[第1期]vs 62.0%[第4期]),立体定向放射手术的使用减少(1.5%[第1期]vs 0.8%[第4期])(均p < 0.001)。随着时间的推移,老年患者(≥70岁)更常使用较低的总放疗剂量(≤40.05 Gy),从第1期的23.4%增加到第4期的42.5% (p < 0.001)。免疫疗法的使用增加了15倍(第1期0.4% vs第4期6.2%,p < 0.001)。相比之下,2年OS (17.6% vs 24.6%)和3年OS (10.0% vs 15.5%)从第1期到第4期均有所增加(p < 0.001)。患者的年龄、种族/民族、教育水平、保险状况和治疗机构的位置/类型是接受三模式治疗和免疫治疗的独立预测因素。结论:在过去的20年里,胶质母细胞瘤OS的改善与临床指南中增加使用三模体治疗有关。解决胶质母细胞瘤现有和新型治疗方式的持续差异对于优化结果和加强研究发现是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in glioblastoma treatment, survival, and disparities in access to care in the United States from 2004 to 2019: a National Cancer Database analysis.

Objective: Population-based studies of histologically confirmed glioblastoma without molecular classification have demonstrated the doubling of 3-year overall survival (OS) since 2005 despite minimal additions to the treatment armamentarium. The authors aimed to evaluate whether changes in tumor characteristics and treatment patterns were associated with survival outcomes. Additionally, the authors sought to elucidate disparities in access to established and novel therapeutic modalities for patients with glioblastoma.

Methods: The authors queried all patients diagnosed with glioblastoma by histology irrespective of biomarkers from the National Cancer Database and divided patients into 4 equal periods: 2004-2007, 2008-2011, 2012-2015, and 2016-2019. The chi-square test and independent t-test/ANOVA were used to assess associations between categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Differences in OS were tested using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors of receiving trimodal therapy (surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy) and immunotherapy.

Results: A total of 127,737 patients with glioblastoma were included, of whom 74,387 (58.2%) were males. The proportion of patients receiving trimodal therapy (48.7% vs 60.0%) significantly increased from period 1 to period 4 (p < 0.001). There were higher rates of gross-total resection (28.6% [period 3] vs 33.8% [period 4]), greater total radiation doses of 60 Gy delivered (39.4% [period 1] vs 60.0% [period 4]), increased use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (16.3% [period 1] vs 62.0% [period 4]), and decreased use of stereotactic radiosurgery (1.5% [period 1] vs 0.8% [period 4]) across the study period (all p < 0.001). Lower total radiotherapy doses (≤ 40.05 Gy) were more commonly administered to elderly patients (≥ 70 years) over time, increasing from 23.4% in period 1 to 42.5% in period 4 (p < 0.001). The use of immunotherapy increased 15-fold (0.4% in period 1 vs 6.2% in period 4, p < 0.001). Comparatively, 2-year OS (17.6% vs 24.6%) and 3-year OS (10.0% vs 15.5%) both increased from period 1 to period 4 (p < 0.001). Patient age, race/ethnicity, education level, insurance status, and treatment facility location/type were independent predictors of receiving trimodal therapy and immunotherapy.

Conclusions: Improvements observed in OS for glioblastoma over the past 2 decades were associated with an increased use of trimodal therapy in accordance with clinical guidelines. Addressing ongoing disparities in the access to established and novel therapeutic modalities for glioblastoma is necessary to optimize outcomes and enhance research discoveries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信