减少手术器械的使用:系统回顾托盘优化方法及其对环境影响、成本和效率的优势。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf030
Myrthe M M Eussen, Esmee Logghe, Stijn Bluiminck, Daan J Comes, Merel L Kimman, Brigitte A B Essers, Lianne M Wellens, Schelto Kruijff, Philip R de Reuver, Nicole D Bouvy
{"title":"减少手术器械的使用:系统回顾托盘优化方法及其对环境影响、成本和效率的优势。","authors":"Myrthe M M Eussen, Esmee Logghe, Stijn Bluiminck, Daan J Comes, Merel L Kimman, Brigitte A B Essers, Lianne M Wellens, Schelto Kruijff, Philip R de Reuver, Nicole D Bouvy","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Operating rooms generate substantial waste and budget expenditure due to extensive material usage. Reusable instruments are often packaged in trays, which accumulate instruments over time. This review quantifies the advantages of tray optimization (removing redundant instruments), including reduced environmental impact, costs, operating room and processing time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library in August 2024 for studies on optimizing surgical trays in human surgeries. Studies were included if they reported on optimization approaches and outcomes related to environmental, economic or efficiency improvements. Exclusions included studies on disposable instruments, animal or veterinary research and patient-specific trays. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 4511 studies, with 45 meeting the inclusion criteria. Half of the studies showed a serious risk of bias, while the rest had a moderate risk. Three main optimization strategies were identified, with expert analysis being the most common (n = 29), followed by mathematical modelling. Environmental benefits were reported in all three included studies, although limited in number. Studies reported that 19 to 89% of instruments could be removed from trays, with 31 studies unanimously reporting cost reductions. Additionally, 17 studies demonstrated improved operational efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tray optimization strategies effectively reduce resource use, resulting in environmental and economic benefits. Although no standard method exists, effective strategies such as procedure observation and clinician feedback may eliminate over half of the instruments, offering a significant opportunity to minimize resource consumption in the operating room.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing surgical instrument usage: systematic review of approaches for tray optimization and its advantages on environmental impact, costs and efficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Myrthe M M Eussen, Esmee Logghe, Stijn Bluiminck, Daan J Comes, Merel L Kimman, Brigitte A B Essers, Lianne M Wellens, Schelto Kruijff, Philip R de Reuver, Nicole D Bouvy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Operating rooms generate substantial waste and budget expenditure due to extensive material usage. Reusable instruments are often packaged in trays, which accumulate instruments over time. This review quantifies the advantages of tray optimization (removing redundant instruments), including reduced environmental impact, costs, operating room and processing time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library in August 2024 for studies on optimizing surgical trays in human surgeries. Studies were included if they reported on optimization approaches and outcomes related to environmental, economic or efficiency improvements. Exclusions included studies on disposable instruments, animal or veterinary research and patient-specific trays. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 4511 studies, with 45 meeting the inclusion criteria. Half of the studies showed a serious risk of bias, while the rest had a moderate risk. Three main optimization strategies were identified, with expert analysis being the most common (n = 29), followed by mathematical modelling. Environmental benefits were reported in all three included studies, although limited in number. Studies reported that 19 to 89% of instruments could be removed from trays, with 31 studies unanimously reporting cost reductions. Additionally, 17 studies demonstrated improved operational efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tray optimization strategies effectively reduce resource use, resulting in environmental and economic benefits. Although no standard method exists, effective strategies such as procedure observation and clinician feedback may eliminate over half of the instruments, offering a significant opportunity to minimize resource consumption in the operating room.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJS Open\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于大量的材料使用,手术室产生了大量的浪费和预算支出。可重复使用的仪器通常包装在托盘中,随着时间的推移,仪器会堆积起来。本综述量化了托盘优化(去除冗余器械)的优势,包括减少环境影响、成本、手术室和处理时间。方法:按照PRISMA指南,于2024年8月在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library中检索优化人体手术托盘的研究。如果研究报告了与环境、经济或效率改善相关的优化方法和结果,则将其纳入研究。排除包括一次性器械、动物或兽医研究和患者专用托盘的研究。使用ROBINS-I(非随机研究的偏倚风险-干预)工具评估偏倚风险。结果:检索到4511项研究,其中45项符合纳入标准。一半的研究显示有严重的偏倚风险,而其余的则有中等的风险。确定了三种主要的优化策略,其中专家分析是最常见的(n = 29),其次是数学建模。所有三项纳入的研究都报告了环境效益,尽管数量有限。研究报告19%至89%的器械可以从托盘中取出,31项研究一致报告成本降低。此外,17项研究表明业务效率有所提高。结论:托盘优化策略有效地减少了资源的利用,取得了环境效益和经济效益。虽然没有标准的方法存在,有效的策略,如过程观察和临床医生的反馈可能会消除一半以上的器械,提供了一个重要的机会,以尽量减少手术室的资源消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing surgical instrument usage: systematic review of approaches for tray optimization and its advantages on environmental impact, costs and efficiency.

Background: Operating rooms generate substantial waste and budget expenditure due to extensive material usage. Reusable instruments are often packaged in trays, which accumulate instruments over time. This review quantifies the advantages of tray optimization (removing redundant instruments), including reduced environmental impact, costs, operating room and processing time.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library in August 2024 for studies on optimizing surgical trays in human surgeries. Studies were included if they reported on optimization approaches and outcomes related to environmental, economic or efficiency improvements. Exclusions included studies on disposable instruments, animal or veterinary research and patient-specific trays. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool.

Results: The search identified 4511 studies, with 45 meeting the inclusion criteria. Half of the studies showed a serious risk of bias, while the rest had a moderate risk. Three main optimization strategies were identified, with expert analysis being the most common (n = 29), followed by mathematical modelling. Environmental benefits were reported in all three included studies, although limited in number. Studies reported that 19 to 89% of instruments could be removed from trays, with 31 studies unanimously reporting cost reductions. Additionally, 17 studies demonstrated improved operational efficiency.

Conclusion: Tray optimization strategies effectively reduce resource use, resulting in environmental and economic benefits. Although no standard method exists, effective strategies such as procedure observation and clinician feedback may eliminate over half of the instruments, offering a significant opportunity to minimize resource consumption in the operating room.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信