患者的经验和期望粪便免疫化学测试调查结直肠癌症状:横断面定性访谈研究患者和从业者在英国。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Adam Biran, Christina Dobson, Colin J Rees, Willie Hamilton, David Humes, Laura Jane Neilson, James Turvill, Christian von Wagner, John Whelpton, Linda Sharp
{"title":"患者的经验和期望粪便免疫化学测试调查结直肠癌症状:横断面定性访谈研究患者和从业者在英国。","authors":"Adam Biran, Christina Dobson, Colin J Rees, Willie Hamilton, David Humes, Laura Jane Neilson, James Turvill, Christian von Wagner, John Whelpton, Linda Sharp","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is now commonplace in the UK to prioritise symptomatic patients for urgent gastrointestinal investigation. The test requires a stool sample to be collected at home by the patient and returned for analysis. In this qualitative study, we sought to understand the feasibility and acceptability of FIT-based triage for patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional, qualitative, experiential interview study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Recruitment was through three participating UK NHS sites (Yorkshire, Midlands, North-East). Health professionals were also identified through membership of the BSG/ACPGBI Symptomatic FIT Guideline Development Group and snowball sampling.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We interviewed 21 patients who had completed FIT and been referred for colonoscopy and 30 primary and secondary care health professionals involved in symptomatic FIT delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completion of FIT was unproblematic from the perspective of patients who returned the test. However, health professionals expressed concern over non-return. Among patients, understanding of the purpose of FIT and the meaning of results varied. Health professionals acknowledged that ensuring patient understanding of these can be challenging. Patients believed colonoscopy was less likely to miss cancer than FIT. Patients with a family or personal history of cancer were particularly anxious and wanted the reassurance of colonoscopy, even with a negative FIT result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no major barriers to the use of FIT in prioritising symptomatic patients for urgent investigation. Improving communication might increase compliance and, possibly, acceptability of non-referral for colonoscopy in the case of a negative test result.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 5","pages":"e093215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient experiences and expectations of faecal immunochemical testing for investigation of colorectal cancer symptoms: a cross-sectional qualitative interview study with patients and practitioners in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Biran, Christina Dobson, Colin J Rees, Willie Hamilton, David Humes, Laura Jane Neilson, James Turvill, Christian von Wagner, John Whelpton, Linda Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is now commonplace in the UK to prioritise symptomatic patients for urgent gastrointestinal investigation. The test requires a stool sample to be collected at home by the patient and returned for analysis. In this qualitative study, we sought to understand the feasibility and acceptability of FIT-based triage for patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional, qualitative, experiential interview study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Recruitment was through three participating UK NHS sites (Yorkshire, Midlands, North-East). Health professionals were also identified through membership of the BSG/ACPGBI Symptomatic FIT Guideline Development Group and snowball sampling.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We interviewed 21 patients who had completed FIT and been referred for colonoscopy and 30 primary and secondary care health professionals involved in symptomatic FIT delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completion of FIT was unproblematic from the perspective of patients who returned the test. However, health professionals expressed concern over non-return. Among patients, understanding of the purpose of FIT and the meaning of results varied. Health professionals acknowledged that ensuring patient understanding of these can be challenging. Patients believed colonoscopy was less likely to miss cancer than FIT. Patients with a family or personal history of cancer were particularly anxious and wanted the reassurance of colonoscopy, even with a negative FIT result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no major barriers to the use of FIT in prioritising symptomatic patients for urgent investigation. Improving communication might increase compliance and, possibly, acceptability of non-referral for colonoscopy in the case of a negative test result.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"e093215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086939/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093215\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)现在在英国很常见,可以优先考虑有症状的患者进行紧急胃肠道检查。该测试需要患者在家中收集粪便样本并返回进行分析。在本定性研究中,我们试图了解基于fitt的患者分诊的可行性和可接受性。设计:横断面、定性、经验性访谈研究。环境:招募是通过三个参与英国NHS网站(约克郡,中部,东北部)。还通过BSG/ACPGBI症状性FIT指南制定小组的成员资格和滚雪球抽样确定了卫生专业人员。参与者:我们采访了21名完成FIT并转诊进行结肠镜检查的患者和30名参与有症状FIT交付的初级和二级保健卫生专业人员。结果:从返回测试的患者的角度来看,FIT的完成没有问题。然而,卫生专业人员对不返回表示关切。患者对FIT目的和结果意义的理解各不相同。卫生专业人员承认,确保患者理解这些可能具有挑战性。患者认为结肠镜检查比FIT更不容易漏诊癌症。有家族或个人癌症病史的患者尤其焦虑,即使FIT结果为阴性,也希望结肠镜检查能让他们安心。结论:我们发现FIT在优先考虑有症状的患者进行紧急调查方面没有主要障碍。改善沟通可能会增加依从性,并可能在检测结果为阴性的情况下增加不转诊结肠镜检查的可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient experiences and expectations of faecal immunochemical testing for investigation of colorectal cancer symptoms: a cross-sectional qualitative interview study with patients and practitioners in the UK.

Objectives: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is now commonplace in the UK to prioritise symptomatic patients for urgent gastrointestinal investigation. The test requires a stool sample to be collected at home by the patient and returned for analysis. In this qualitative study, we sought to understand the feasibility and acceptability of FIT-based triage for patients.

Design: A cross-sectional, qualitative, experiential interview study.

Setting: Recruitment was through three participating UK NHS sites (Yorkshire, Midlands, North-East). Health professionals were also identified through membership of the BSG/ACPGBI Symptomatic FIT Guideline Development Group and snowball sampling.

Participants: We interviewed 21 patients who had completed FIT and been referred for colonoscopy and 30 primary and secondary care health professionals involved in symptomatic FIT delivery.

Results: Completion of FIT was unproblematic from the perspective of patients who returned the test. However, health professionals expressed concern over non-return. Among patients, understanding of the purpose of FIT and the meaning of results varied. Health professionals acknowledged that ensuring patient understanding of these can be challenging. Patients believed colonoscopy was less likely to miss cancer than FIT. Patients with a family or personal history of cancer were particularly anxious and wanted the reassurance of colonoscopy, even with a negative FIT result.

Conclusions: We found no major barriers to the use of FIT in prioritising symptomatic patients for urgent investigation. Improving communication might increase compliance and, possibly, acceptability of non-referral for colonoscopy in the case of a negative test result.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信