关键卫生素养的概念化——来自西方和东亚视角的见解:范围审查。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Cindy Yue Tian, Clement Cheuk Wai Ng, Luyao Xie, Phoenix K H Mo, Dong Dong, Don Nutbeam, Eliza L Y Wong
{"title":"关键卫生素养的概念化——来自西方和东亚视角的见解:范围审查。","authors":"Cindy Yue Tian, Clement Cheuk Wai Ng, Luyao Xie, Phoenix K H Mo, Dong Dong, Don Nutbeam, Eliza L Y Wong","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes a scoping review of components of critical health literacy (CHL) and examines how these components have been conceptualised, highlighting fundamental differences from the Western and East Asian perspectives. The review includes 23 studies, with the majority (n=19) from Western countries and only two from East Asia. Three primary components of CHL were identified: 'information appraisal', 'understanding of social determinants of health (SDH)' and 'actions to address SDH'. The findings indicate that these prevailing components of CHL are largely grounded in Western social structures, while East Asian studies primarily focused on the first component. Given the distinct social and cultural norms in these regions, this study explored the potential differences in how social factors influencing health are understood and prioritised in Western versus East Asian contexts. From a Western universalistic perspective, actions to address SDH often involve political and social movements aimed at improving individual and community health. However, such actions may not be feasible or relevant for many East Asian population groups, who may have more limited opportunities to engage in Western-style social movements, and culturally, have a stronger focus on family and local community. Furthermore, building on the theory of 'distributed health literacy', we argued that interpersonal-level actions to address SDH are also crucial and can serve as a stepping stone to social-level actions, which have been more extensively discussed in Western literature. We conclude that CHL is a context-specific concept, and its definition and practical application need further examination across different contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualisation of critical health literacy-insights from Western and East Asian perspectives: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Cindy Yue Tian, Clement Cheuk Wai Ng, Luyao Xie, Phoenix K H Mo, Dong Dong, Don Nutbeam, Eliza L Y Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article describes a scoping review of components of critical health literacy (CHL) and examines how these components have been conceptualised, highlighting fundamental differences from the Western and East Asian perspectives. The review includes 23 studies, with the majority (n=19) from Western countries and only two from East Asia. Three primary components of CHL were identified: 'information appraisal', 'understanding of social determinants of health (SDH)' and 'actions to address SDH'. The findings indicate that these prevailing components of CHL are largely grounded in Western social structures, while East Asian studies primarily focused on the first component. Given the distinct social and cultural norms in these regions, this study explored the potential differences in how social factors influencing health are understood and prioritised in Western versus East Asian contexts. From a Western universalistic perspective, actions to address SDH often involve political and social movements aimed at improving individual and community health. However, such actions may not be feasible or relevant for many East Asian population groups, who may have more limited opportunities to engage in Western-style social movements, and culturally, have a stronger focus on family and local community. Furthermore, building on the theory of 'distributed health literacy', we argued that interpersonal-level actions to address SDH are also crucial and can serve as a stepping stone to social-level actions, which have been more extensively discussed in Western literature. We conclude that CHL is a context-specific concept, and its definition and practical application need further examination across different contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083324/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018232\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018232","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了关键健康素养(CHL)组成部分的范围审查,并检查了这些组成部分是如何概念化的,突出了西方和东亚观点的根本差异。该综述包括23项研究,其中大多数(n=19)来自西方国家,只有两项来自东亚。确定了CHL的三个主要组成部分:“信息评估”、“对健康社会决定因素(SDH)的理解”和“解决SDH的行动”。研究结果表明,CHL的这些主要组成部分主要基于西方的社会结构,而东亚的研究主要集中在第一个组成部分。鉴于这些地区不同的社会和文化规范,本研究探讨了在西方和东亚背景下如何理解和优先考虑影响健康的社会因素的潜在差异。从西方普遍主义的角度来看,解决可持续健康问题的行动往往涉及旨在改善个人和社区健康的政治和社会运动。然而,这种行动对许多东亚人口群体可能不可行或不相关,因为他们参与西方式社会运动的机会可能更有限,而且在文化上更注重家庭和当地社区。此外,在“分布式健康素养”理论的基础上,我们认为解决SDH的人际层面行动也至关重要,可以作为社会层面行动的垫脚石,这在西方文献中已经得到了更广泛的讨论。我们得出结论,CHL是一个特定于上下文的概念,其定义和实际应用需要在不同的背景下进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptualisation of critical health literacy-insights from Western and East Asian perspectives: a scoping review.

This article describes a scoping review of components of critical health literacy (CHL) and examines how these components have been conceptualised, highlighting fundamental differences from the Western and East Asian perspectives. The review includes 23 studies, with the majority (n=19) from Western countries and only two from East Asia. Three primary components of CHL were identified: 'information appraisal', 'understanding of social determinants of health (SDH)' and 'actions to address SDH'. The findings indicate that these prevailing components of CHL are largely grounded in Western social structures, while East Asian studies primarily focused on the first component. Given the distinct social and cultural norms in these regions, this study explored the potential differences in how social factors influencing health are understood and prioritised in Western versus East Asian contexts. From a Western universalistic perspective, actions to address SDH often involve political and social movements aimed at improving individual and community health. However, such actions may not be feasible or relevant for many East Asian population groups, who may have more limited opportunities to engage in Western-style social movements, and culturally, have a stronger focus on family and local community. Furthermore, building on the theory of 'distributed health literacy', we argued that interpersonal-level actions to address SDH are also crucial and can serve as a stepping stone to social-level actions, which have been more extensively discussed in Western literature. We conclude that CHL is a context-specific concept, and its definition and practical application need further examination across different contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信