Leah J Beight, Jaime Pardo, Stephanie K Serres, Rene Flores, Evelyn Inga, Prabh R Pannu, Hiral Thakkar, Laura Martin Manfroi, Jessica Means, Tarbia Hamid, Samir Mitri, Ted A James
{"title":"乳腺癌手术再切除后的生活质量和决策满意度。","authors":"Leah J Beight, Jaime Pardo, Stephanie K Serres, Rene Flores, Evelyn Inga, Prabh R Pannu, Hiral Thakkar, Laura Martin Manfroi, Jessica Means, Tarbia Hamid, Samir Mitri, Ted A James","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The literature reports positive margin rates after breast conserving surgery (BCS) as high as 20-60 %, often necessitating re-excision, which may negatively influence patients. This study evaluates how re-excision affects quality-of-life and decision satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent re-excision following BCS from January 2013 to December 2015 at a single institution were surveyed on physical, social, and emotional wellbeing, as well as satisfaction with their initial surgical decision. Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 106 patients, 51 (48.1 %) completed the survey. Quality of life declined in all categories following re-excision, with a significant reduction in emotional wellbeing (p = 0.006). Decision satisfaction to undergo partial mastectomy decreased from 76.5 % to 47.1 %, while dissatisfaction rose from 2 % to 11.8 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-excision was associated with decreased emotional wellbeing and increased decision dissatisfaction with breast conservation. These findings emphasize the need to optimize preoperative counseling and margin control during the primary surgery to enhance patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life and decision satisfaction after re-excision in breast cancer surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Leah J Beight, Jaime Pardo, Stephanie K Serres, Rene Flores, Evelyn Inga, Prabh R Pannu, Hiral Thakkar, Laura Martin Manfroi, Jessica Means, Tarbia Hamid, Samir Mitri, Ted A James\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The literature reports positive margin rates after breast conserving surgery (BCS) as high as 20-60 %, often necessitating re-excision, which may negatively influence patients. This study evaluates how re-excision affects quality-of-life and decision satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent re-excision following BCS from January 2013 to December 2015 at a single institution were surveyed on physical, social, and emotional wellbeing, as well as satisfaction with their initial surgical decision. Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 106 patients, 51 (48.1 %) completed the survey. Quality of life declined in all categories following re-excision, with a significant reduction in emotional wellbeing (p = 0.006). Decision satisfaction to undergo partial mastectomy decreased from 76.5 % to 47.1 %, while dissatisfaction rose from 2 % to 11.8 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-excision was associated with decreased emotional wellbeing and increased decision dissatisfaction with breast conservation. These findings emphasize the need to optimize preoperative counseling and margin control during the primary surgery to enhance patient experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"116401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116401\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality of life and decision satisfaction after re-excision in breast cancer surgery.
Introduction: The literature reports positive margin rates after breast conserving surgery (BCS) as high as 20-60 %, often necessitating re-excision, which may negatively influence patients. This study evaluates how re-excision affects quality-of-life and decision satisfaction.
Methods: Patients who underwent re-excision following BCS from January 2013 to December 2015 at a single institution were surveyed on physical, social, and emotional wellbeing, as well as satisfaction with their initial surgical decision. Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test were used for analysis.
Results: Among 106 patients, 51 (48.1 %) completed the survey. Quality of life declined in all categories following re-excision, with a significant reduction in emotional wellbeing (p = 0.006). Decision satisfaction to undergo partial mastectomy decreased from 76.5 % to 47.1 %, while dissatisfaction rose from 2 % to 11.8 %.
Conclusion: Re-excision was associated with decreased emotional wellbeing and increased decision dissatisfaction with breast conservation. These findings emphasize the need to optimize preoperative counseling and margin control during the primary surgery to enhance patient experience.
期刊介绍：
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
