房颤患者的多重用药和潜在的药物相互作用

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ying Bai, Jianqi Wang, Guangyao Li, Zhen Zhou
{"title":"房颤患者的多重用药和潜在的药物相互作用","authors":"Ying Bai,&nbsp;Jianqi Wang,&nbsp;Guangyao Li,&nbsp;Zhen Zhou","doi":"10.1155/jcpt/6632271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>What is Known and Objective:</b> The use of multiple medications, or polypharmacy, is associated with an elevated risk of potential drug–drug interactions (pDDIs), consequently heightening the probability of adverse drug reactions. Currently, there is a dearth of data regarding pDDIs in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) within real-world scenarios. This study is designed to investigate the existing state of polypharmacy and pDDIs in Chinese AF patients and to analyze the factors influencing pDDIs.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center retrospective investigation conducted at a tertiary hospital in China. Polypharmacy and pDDIs were examined based on the medications prescribed at the time of discharge. The pDDIs were assessed using the Lexi-Interact database and classified into Types A, B, C, D, and X.</p>\n <p><b>Results and Discussion:</b> The study encompassed 802 AF patients. The median age was 73 years (ranging from 64 to 80). The most (72.7%) were 65 years or older, and 53.9% were male. The incidence rates of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 74.8% and 29.8%, respectively. At discharge, 69.0% of patients had at least one clinically relevant pDDI. There were 1820 (84.2%), 261 (12.1%), and 81 (3.7%) interactions categorized as Types C, D, and X, respectively. The most prevalent Type C interaction was the combined use of antihypertensive medications. Among Type D interactions, the most common was the combination of anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs. The most frequent Type X interaction involved drugs that augmented the hyperkalemic effect. Through multivariate analysis, advanced age (<i>p</i> = 0.008) and a greater number of medications (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were significant predictors of pDDIs.</p>\n <p><b>What is New and Conclusions:</b> Polypharmacy and pDDIs are widespread among AF patients. Advanced age and an increased number of drugs were determined to be predictive factors for pDDIs. The risk of DDIs can be reduced by decreasing the number of medications or opting for alternative drugs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/6632271","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polypharmacy and Potential Drug–Drug Interactions in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Ying Bai,&nbsp;Jianqi Wang,&nbsp;Guangyao Li,&nbsp;Zhen Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jcpt/6632271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>What is Known and Objective:</b> The use of multiple medications, or polypharmacy, is associated with an elevated risk of potential drug–drug interactions (pDDIs), consequently heightening the probability of adverse drug reactions. Currently, there is a dearth of data regarding pDDIs in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) within real-world scenarios. This study is designed to investigate the existing state of polypharmacy and pDDIs in Chinese AF patients and to analyze the factors influencing pDDIs.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center retrospective investigation conducted at a tertiary hospital in China. Polypharmacy and pDDIs were examined based on the medications prescribed at the time of discharge. The pDDIs were assessed using the Lexi-Interact database and classified into Types A, B, C, D, and X.</p>\\n <p><b>Results and Discussion:</b> The study encompassed 802 AF patients. The median age was 73 years (ranging from 64 to 80). The most (72.7%) were 65 years or older, and 53.9% were male. The incidence rates of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 74.8% and 29.8%, respectively. At discharge, 69.0% of patients had at least one clinically relevant pDDI. There were 1820 (84.2%), 261 (12.1%), and 81 (3.7%) interactions categorized as Types C, D, and X, respectively. The most prevalent Type C interaction was the combined use of antihypertensive medications. Among Type D interactions, the most common was the combination of anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs. The most frequent Type X interaction involved drugs that augmented the hyperkalemic effect. Through multivariate analysis, advanced age (<i>p</i> = 0.008) and a greater number of medications (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were significant predictors of pDDIs.</p>\\n <p><b>What is New and Conclusions:</b> Polypharmacy and pDDIs are widespread among AF patients. Advanced age and an increased number of drugs were determined to be predictive factors for pDDIs. The risk of DDIs can be reduced by decreasing the number of medications or opting for alternative drugs.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/6632271\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jcpt/6632271\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jcpt/6632271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已知情况和目的:多种药物或多种药物的使用与潜在药物-药物相互作用(pddi)的风险增加有关,从而增加了药物不良反应的可能性。目前,中国房颤(AF)患者的pddi数据缺乏。本研究旨在调查中国房颤患者多药及pddi的现状,并分析影响pddi的因素。方法:在中国某三级医院进行单中心回顾性调查。根据出院时所开的药物进行综合用药和pddi检查。使用Lexi-Interact数据库对pddi进行评估,并将其分为A、B、C、D和x型。结果和讨论:该研究包括802例房颤患者。中位年龄为73岁(从64岁到80岁)。其中65岁及以上的占72.7%,男性占53.9%。多药和过度多药的发生率分别为74.8%和29.8%。出院时,69.0%的患者至少有一次临床相关的pDDI。分别有1820例(84.2%)、261例(12.1%)和81例(3.7%)相互作用被分类为C、D和X型。最常见的C型相互作用是联合使用抗高血压药物。在D型相互作用中,最常见的是抗凝血剂和抗血小板药物的联合作用。最常见的X型相互作用包括增强高钾效应的药物。多因素分析显示,年龄越大(p = 0.008)、服药次数越多(p <;0.001)是pddi的显著预测因子。最新进展及结论:多药联用和pddi在房颤患者中普遍存在。高龄和用药数量增加被确定为pddi的预测因素。ddi的风险可以通过减少药物的数量或选择替代药物来降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Polypharmacy and Potential Drug–Drug Interactions in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Polypharmacy and Potential Drug–Drug Interactions in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

What is Known and Objective: The use of multiple medications, or polypharmacy, is associated with an elevated risk of potential drug–drug interactions (pDDIs), consequently heightening the probability of adverse drug reactions. Currently, there is a dearth of data regarding pDDIs in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) within real-world scenarios. This study is designed to investigate the existing state of polypharmacy and pDDIs in Chinese AF patients and to analyze the factors influencing pDDIs.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective investigation conducted at a tertiary hospital in China. Polypharmacy and pDDIs were examined based on the medications prescribed at the time of discharge. The pDDIs were assessed using the Lexi-Interact database and classified into Types A, B, C, D, and X.

Results and Discussion: The study encompassed 802 AF patients. The median age was 73 years (ranging from 64 to 80). The most (72.7%) were 65 years or older, and 53.9% were male. The incidence rates of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 74.8% and 29.8%, respectively. At discharge, 69.0% of patients had at least one clinically relevant pDDI. There were 1820 (84.2%), 261 (12.1%), and 81 (3.7%) interactions categorized as Types C, D, and X, respectively. The most prevalent Type C interaction was the combined use of antihypertensive medications. Among Type D interactions, the most common was the combination of anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs. The most frequent Type X interaction involved drugs that augmented the hyperkalemic effect. Through multivariate analysis, advanced age (p = 0.008) and a greater number of medications (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of pDDIs.

What is New and Conclusions: Polypharmacy and pDDIs are widespread among AF patients. Advanced age and an increased number of drugs were determined to be predictive factors for pDDIs. The risk of DDIs can be reduced by decreasing the number of medications or opting for alternative drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信